The impact of carbon emission trading policy on overcapacity of companies: Evidence from China

被引:28
|
作者
Wang, Hai [1 ]
Ye, Shuai [1 ]
Chen, Hui [1 ]
Yin, Junya [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Tailong Finance Sch, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emission trading; Overcapacity; China; Difference-in-differences; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; CAPACITY UTILIZATION; INVESTMENT; INNOVATION; CONSTRAINTS; UNCERTAINTY; INDUSTRIES; OPTIONS; GROWTH; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106929
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As a market incentive-based environmental regulation, the carbon emission trading (CET) policy is an important tool for China to achieve "carbon peak" and "carbon neutrality" goals. However, it is not clear how the CET policy will affect companies' overcapacity. Given this, based on collecting the list of the CET pilot companies, this paper uses the difference-in-differences (DID) model to explore the impact of the CET policy on companies' overcapacity. It's found that the CET policy will significantly aggravate companies' overcapacity. The results of the mechanism analysis show that the CET policy will expand companies' fixed assets investment, reduce their turnover of fixed assets, and increase the credit support and green subsidies provided by the government to companies, thereby leading to a disorderly expansion of capacity. Besides, heterogeneity analysis shows that companies' overcapacity aggravation caused by the CET policy is more prominent in regions with low marketization levels, backward economic development levels, and weak environmental regulation intensity, stateowned companies and companies with low R & D levels. This paper not only provides new research literature for the CET policy and overcapacity, but also provides more empirical evidence at the micro level for the continuous improvement of the national CET market.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of carbon emission trading policy on regional total factor productivity
    Wen, Xin
    Meng, Fange
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 12
  • [22] The impact of carbon emission trading policy on firms' green innovation in China
    Yu, Hongxin
    Jiang, Yaohui
    Zhang, Zhaowen
    Shang, Wen-Long
    Han, Chunjia
    Zhao, Yuanjun
    FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [23] The impact of carbon emission trading policy on firms’ green innovation in China
    Hongxin Yu
    Yaohui Jiang
    Zhaowen Zhang
    Wen-Long Shang
    Chunjia Han
    Yuanjun Zhao
    Financial Innovation, 8
  • [24] Relationship between carbon emission trading schemes and companies’ total factor productivity: evidence from listed companies in China
    Maogang Tang
    Silu Cheng
    Wenqing Guo
    Weibiao Ma
    Fengxia Hu
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 11735 - 11767
  • [25] Does carbon emission trading improve low-carbon technical efficiency? Evidence from China
    Cai, Wugan
    Ye, Peiyun
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 29 : 46 - 56
  • [26] Selective industrial policy and overcapacity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Ge, Pengfei
    Zhu, Rui
    Chen, Yize
    Huang, Xiulu
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2024, 48 (03)
  • [27] How does carbon emissions trading scheme affect the investment efficiency of companies? Evidence from China
    Wang, Wei
    Zhang, Yue-Jun
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 368
  • [28] Impact of carbon trading policy on corporate capital structure: Empirical evidence from China
    Zhang, Zhaolong
    Liao, Jing
    Li, Hanlin
    Pan, Jiaqi
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [29] Impacts of pilot carbon emission trading policies on urban environmental pollution: Evidence from China
    Lu, Hongyu
    Cheng, Zhao
    Yao, Zhuang
    Xue, Anna
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 359
  • [30] Does carbon emission trading policy affect bank loans of firms? Evidence from China
    Yu, Zhi
    Cao, Yali
    Liu, Mo
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2022, 29 (18) : 1709 - 1714