The impact of carbon emission trading policy on overcapacity of companies: Evidence from China

被引:31
作者
Wang, Hai [1 ]
Ye, Shuai [1 ]
Chen, Hui [1 ]
Yin, Junya [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Tailong Finance Sch, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emission trading; Overcapacity; China; Difference-in-differences; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; CAPACITY UTILIZATION; INVESTMENT; INNOVATION; CONSTRAINTS; UNCERTAINTY; INDUSTRIES; OPTIONS; GROWTH; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106929
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
As a market incentive-based environmental regulation, the carbon emission trading (CET) policy is an important tool for China to achieve "carbon peak" and "carbon neutrality" goals. However, it is not clear how the CET policy will affect companies' overcapacity. Given this, based on collecting the list of the CET pilot companies, this paper uses the difference-in-differences (DID) model to explore the impact of the CET policy on companies' overcapacity. It's found that the CET policy will significantly aggravate companies' overcapacity. The results of the mechanism analysis show that the CET policy will expand companies' fixed assets investment, reduce their turnover of fixed assets, and increase the credit support and green subsidies provided by the government to companies, thereby leading to a disorderly expansion of capacity. Besides, heterogeneity analysis shows that companies' overcapacity aggravation caused by the CET policy is more prominent in regions with low marketization levels, backward economic development levels, and weak environmental regulation intensity, stateowned companies and companies with low R & D levels. This paper not only provides new research literature for the CET policy and overcapacity, but also provides more empirical evidence at the micro level for the continuous improvement of the national CET market.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Law, finance, and economic growth in China [J].
Allen, F ;
Qian, J ;
Qian, MJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (01) :57-116
[2]   Real Options Models of the Firm, Capacity Overhang, and the Cross Section of Stock Returns [J].
Aretz, Kevin ;
Pope, Peter F. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2018, 73 (03) :1363-1415
[3]   Environmental regulation and labor demand: evidence from the South Coast Air Basin [J].
Berman, E ;
Bui, LTM .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2001, 79 (02) :265-295
[4]   MEASURING AND ASSESSING CAPACITY UTILIZATION IN THE MANUFACTURING SECTORS OF 9 OECD COUNTRIES [J].
BERNDT, ER ;
HESSE, DM .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1986, 30 (05) :961-989
[5]   Foreign subsidization and excess capacity [J].
Blonigen, Bruce A. ;
Wilson, Wesley W. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 80 (02) :200-211
[6]   Revealing information in auctions: the allocation effect [J].
Board, Simon .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2009, 38 (01) :125-135
[7]   Capacity factor of wind power realized values vs. estimates [J].
Boccard, Nicolas .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (07) :2679-2688
[8]   The real effects of financial constraints: Evidence from a financial crisis [J].
Campello, Murillo ;
Graham, John R. ;
Harvey, Campbell R. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 97 (03) :470-487
[9]   CATASTROPHIC NATURAL DISASTERS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH [J].
Cavallo, Eduardo ;
Galiani, Sebastian ;
Noy, Ilan ;
Pantano, Juan .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2013, 95 (05) :1549-1561
[10]   The Cost of Carbon: Capital Market Effects of the Proposed Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) [J].
Chapple, Larelle ;
Clarkson, Peter M. ;
Gold, Daniel L. .
ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2013, 49 (01) :1-33