Potential of technological innovation to reduce the carbon footprint of urban facility agriculture: A food-energy-water-waste nexus perspective

被引:26
作者
Wang, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yu [2 ,3 ]
Sun, Mingxing [4 ]
Wu, Jiayu [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Landscape Architecture, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Ctr Balanced Architecture, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Zhejiang Univ Co Ltd, Architectural Design & Res Inst, Hangzhou 310028, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Ecosyst Network Observat & Modeling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Urban facility agriculture; Carbon footprint; Technological innovation; Food -energy -water -waste nexus; System dynamic modeling; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117806
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As an emerging form of agriculture, urban facility agriculture is an important supplement to traditional agriculture and one of the ways to alleviate the urban food crisis, but it may generate a high carbon footprint. A comprehensive assessment of urban facility agriculture is a necessity for promoting its low-carbon development. In this study, the carbon footprint of urban facility agriculture under four different technological innovation models was simulated by life cycle assessment and a system dynamics model for a carbon footprint accounting without considering economic risk. Case 1, as the basic case, is Household farm facility agriculture. Case 2 is the introduction of vertical hydroponic technology based on Case 1, Case 3 is the introduction of distributed hybrid renewable energy micro-grid technology based on Case 2, and Case 4 is the introduction of automatic composting technology based on Case 3. These four cases demonstrate the gradual optimization of the food-energy-water-waste nexus in urban facility agriculture. This study further uses the system dynamics model for carbon reduction potential considering economic risk to simulate the diffusion (promotion) scale and carbon reduction potential of different technological innovations. Research results show that with the superposition of technologies, the carbon footprint per unit land area is gradually reduced, and the carbon footprint of Case 4 is the lowest at 4.78e+06 kg CO2eq. However, the gradual superposition of technologies will further limit the diffusion scale of technological innovation, thereby reducing the carbon reduction potential of technological innovation. In Chongming District, Shanghai, under theoretical circumstances, the carbon reduction potential of Case 4 is the highest at 1.6e+09 kg CO2eq, but the actual carbon reduction potential is only 1.8e+07 kg CO2eq due to excessive economic risks. By contrast, the actual carbon reduction potential of Case 2 is the highest with 9.6e+08 kg CO2eq. To fully achieve the carbon reduction potential of technology innovation, it is necessary to promote the scale diffusion of Urban facility agricultural technology innovation by raising the sales price of agricultural products and the grid connection price of renewable electricity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Integration of greenhouse gas control technologies within the energy, water and food nexus to enhance the environmental performance of food production systems
    Al-Ansari, Tareq
    Korre, Anna
    Nie, Zhenggang
    Shah, Nilay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 162 : 1592 - 1606
  • [2] NEW PRODUCT GROWTH FOR MODEL CONSUMER DURABLES
    BASS, FM
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES A-THEORY, 1969, 15 (05): : 215 - 227
  • [3] Benis K., 2015, P INT C CISBAT 2015
  • [4] Integrative technology hubs for urban food-energy-water nexuses and cost-benefit-risk tradeoffs (II): Design strategies for urban sustainability
    Chang, Ni-Bin
    Hossain, Uzzal
    Valencia, Andrea
    Qiu, Jiangxiao
    Zheng, Qipeng P.
    Gu, Lixing
    Che, Mengnan
    Lu, Jia-Wei
    Pires, Ana
    Kaandorp, Chelsea
    Abraham, Edo
    ten Veldhuis, Marie-Claire
    van de Giesen, Nick
    Molle, Bruno
    Tomas, Severine
    Ait-Mouhe, Nassim
    Dotta, Deborah
    Declercq, Remi
    Perrin, Martin
    Conrad, Leon
    Molle, Geoffrey
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 51 (14) : 1533 - 1583
  • [5] Integrative technology hubs for urban food-energy-water nexuses and cost-benefit-risk tradeoffs (I): Global trend and technology metrics
    Chang, Ni-Bin
    Hossain, Uzzal
    Valencia, Andrea
    Qiu, Jiangxiao
    Zheng, Qipeng P.
    Gu, Lixing
    Chen, Mengnan
    Lu, Jia-Wei
    Pires, Ana
    Kaandorp, Chelsea
    Abraham, Edo
    ten Veldhuis, Marie-Claire
    van de Giesen, Nick
    Molle, Bruno
    Tomas, Severine
    Ait-Mouheb, Nassim
    Dotta, Deborah
    Declercq, Remi
    Perrin, Martin
    Conradi, Leon
    Molle, Geoffrey
    [J]. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 51 (13) : 1397 - 1442
  • [6] Comparative life cycle assessment of aquaponics and hydroponics in the Midwestern United States
    Chen, Peng
    Zhu, Gaotian
    Kim, Hye-Ji
    Brown, Paul B.
    Huang, Jen-Yi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 275
  • [7] Sustainable utilization of biowaste compost for renewable energy and soil amendments
    Chia, Wen Yi
    Chew, Kit Wayne
    Le, Cheng Foh
    Lam, Su Shiung
    Chee, Chelsea Siew Chyi
    Ooi, Mae See Luan
    Show, Pau Loke
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2020, 267
  • [8] Fostering Multi-Functional Urban Agriculture: Experiences from the Champions in a Revitalized Farm Pond Community in Taoyuan, Taiwan
    Chou, Rung-Jiun
    Wu, Chen-Ting
    Huang, Feng-Tzu
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (11)
  • [9] Cohen N., 2022, Urban Governance, DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.03.001
  • [10] Environmental innovation and the food, energy and water nexus in the food service industry
    da Rosa, Fabricia Silva
    Lunkes, Rogerio Joao
    Spigarelli, Francesca
    Compagnucci, Lorenzo
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 166