Variation in cartilage T2 and T2*mapping of the wrist: a comparison between 3-and 7-T MRI

BackgroundTo analyze regional variations in T2 and T2* relaxation times in wrist joint cartilage and the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) at 3 and 7 T and to compare values between field strengths.MethodsTwenty-five healthy controls and 25 patients with chronic wrist pain were examined at 3 and 7 T on the same day using T2- and T2*-weighted sequences. Six different regions of interest (ROIs) were evaluated for cartilage and 3 ROIs were evaluated at the TFCC based on manual segmentation. Paired t-tests were used to compare T2 and T2* values between field strengths and between different ROIs. Spearman's rank correlation was calculated to assess correlations between T2 and T2* time values at 3 and 7 T.ResultsT2 and T2* time values of the cartilage differed significantly between 3 and 7 T for all ROIs (p <= 0.045), with one exception: at the distal lunate, no significant differences in T2 values were observed between field strengths. T2* values differed significantly between 3 and 7 T for all ROIs of the TFCC (p <= 0.001). Spearman's rank correlation between 3 and 7 T ranged from 0.03 to 0.62 for T2 values and from 0.01 to 0.48 for T2* values. T2 and T2* values for cartilage varied across anatomic locations in healthy controls at both 3 and 7 T.ConclusionQuantitative results of T2 and T2* mapping at the wrist differ between field strengths, with poor correlation between 3 and 7 T. Local variations in cartilage T2 and T2* values are observed in healthy individuals.Relevance statementT2 and T2* mapping are feasible for compositional imaging of the TFCC and the cartilage at the wrist at both 3 and 7 T, but the clinical interpretation remains challenging due to differences between field strengths and variations between anatomic locations.Key points center dot Field strength and anatomic locations influence T2 and T2* values at the wrist.center dot T2 and T2* values have a poor correlation between 3 and 7 T.center dot Local reference values are needed for each anatomic location for reliable interpretation.Key points center dot Field strength and anatomic locations influence T2 and T2* values at the wrist.center dot T2 and T2* values have a poor correlation between 3 and 7 T.center dot Local reference values are needed for each anatomic location for reliable interpretation.Key points center dot Field strength and anatomic locations influence T2 and T2* values at the wrist.center dot T2 and T2* values have a poor correlation between 3 and 7 T.center dot Local reference values are needed for each anatomic location for reliable interpretation.