Automated CT LI-RADS v2018 scoring of liver observations using machine learning: A multivendor, multicentre retrospective study

被引:4
|
作者
Mule, Sebastien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ronot, Maxime [4 ,5 ]
Ghosn, Mario [1 ,2 ]
Sartoris, Riccardo [4 ]
Corrias, Giuseppe [4 ]
Reizine, Edouard [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Morard, Vincent [6 ]
Quelever, Ronan [6 ]
Dumont, Laura [6 ]
Londono, Jorge Hernandez [6 ]
Coustaud, Nicolas [6 ]
Vilgrain, Valerie [4 ,5 ]
Luciani, Alain [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Henri Mondor, AP HP, Serv Imagerie Med, Creteil, France
[2] Univ Paris Est Creteil, Fac Sante, Creteil, France
[3] INSERM IMRB, U955, Equipe 18, F-94000 Creteil, France
[4] Hop Beaujon, AP HP Nord, Serv Radiol, 100 Bd Gen Leclerc, F-92110 Clichy, France
[5] Univ Paris, CRI, INSERM, U1149, Paris, France
[6] GE Healthcare, Buc, France
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; LI-RADS; Major features; Computed tomography; Machine learning; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100857
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Assessment of computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 major features leads to substantial inter-reader variability and potential decrease in hepatocellular carcinoma diagnostic accuracy. We assessed the performance and added-value of a machine learning (ML)-based algorithm in assessing CT LI-RADS major features and categorisation of liver observations compared with qualitative assessment performed by a panel of radiologists.Methods: High-risk patients as per LI-RADS v2018 with pathologically proven liver lesions who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT at diagnosis between January 2015 and March 2019 in seven centres in five countries were retrospectively included and randomly divided into a training set (n = 84 lesions) and a test set (n = 345 lesions). An ML algorithm was trained to classify non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout, and enhancing capsule as present, absent, or of uncertain presence. LI-RADS major features and categories were compared with qualitative assessment of two independent readers. The performance of a sequential use of the ML algorithm and independent readers were also evaluated in a triage and an add-on scenario in LR-3/4 lesions. The combined evaluation of three other senior readers was used as reference standard.Results: A total of 318 patients bearing 429 lesions were included. Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 in the test set were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.72) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.96) respectively, with 242 (70.1%) lesions accurately categorised. Using the ML algorithm in a triage scenario improved the overall performance for LR-5. (0.86 and 0.93 sensitivity, 0.82 and 0.76 specificity, 78% and 82.3% accuracy for the two independent readers).Conclusions: Quantitative assessment of CT LI-RADS v2018 major features is feasible and diagnoses LR-5 observations with high performance especially in combination with the radiologist's visual analysis in patients at high-risk for HCC.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [41] Inter-observer agreement and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 for differentiating tumor in vein from bland thrombus using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Cunha, Guilherme Moura
    Wolfson, Tanya
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Morisaka, Hiroyuki
    Onohara, Kojiro
    Shimizu, Tatsuya
    Omiya, Yoshie
    Sugiyama, Hiroki
    Okumura, Akihiro
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (08) : 2557 - 2569
  • [42] Inter-observer agreement and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 for differentiating tumor in vein from bland thrombus using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Shintaro Ichikawa
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Guilherme Moura Cunha
    Tanya Wolfson
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Hiroyuki Morisaka
    Kojiro Onohara
    Tatsuya Shimizu
    Yoshie Omiya
    Hiroki Sugiyama
    Akihiro Okumura
    Hiroshi Onishi
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 2557 - 2569
  • [43] Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS v2018 versus KLCA-NCC 2018 Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Hepatobiliary Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Shin, Jaeseung
    Lee, Sunyoung
    Yoon, Ja Kyung
    Son, Won Jeong
    Roh, Yun Ho
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Park, Mi-Suk
    GUT AND LIVER, 2023, 17 (03) : 466 - 474