Automated CT LI-RADS v2018 scoring of liver observations using machine learning: A multivendor, multicentre retrospective study

被引:4
|
作者
Mule, Sebastien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ronot, Maxime [4 ,5 ]
Ghosn, Mario [1 ,2 ]
Sartoris, Riccardo [4 ]
Corrias, Giuseppe [4 ]
Reizine, Edouard [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Morard, Vincent [6 ]
Quelever, Ronan [6 ]
Dumont, Laura [6 ]
Londono, Jorge Hernandez [6 ]
Coustaud, Nicolas [6 ]
Vilgrain, Valerie [4 ,5 ]
Luciani, Alain [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Henri Mondor, AP HP, Serv Imagerie Med, Creteil, France
[2] Univ Paris Est Creteil, Fac Sante, Creteil, France
[3] INSERM IMRB, U955, Equipe 18, F-94000 Creteil, France
[4] Hop Beaujon, AP HP Nord, Serv Radiol, 100 Bd Gen Leclerc, F-92110 Clichy, France
[5] Univ Paris, CRI, INSERM, U1149, Paris, France
[6] GE Healthcare, Buc, France
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; LI-RADS; Major features; Computed tomography; Machine learning; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100857
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Assessment of computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 major features leads to substantial inter-reader variability and potential decrease in hepatocellular carcinoma diagnostic accuracy. We assessed the performance and added-value of a machine learning (ML)-based algorithm in assessing CT LI-RADS major features and categorisation of liver observations compared with qualitative assessment performed by a panel of radiologists.Methods: High-risk patients as per LI-RADS v2018 with pathologically proven liver lesions who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT at diagnosis between January 2015 and March 2019 in seven centres in five countries were retrospectively included and randomly divided into a training set (n = 84 lesions) and a test set (n = 345 lesions). An ML algorithm was trained to classify non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout, and enhancing capsule as present, absent, or of uncertain presence. LI-RADS major features and categories were compared with qualitative assessment of two independent readers. The performance of a sequential use of the ML algorithm and independent readers were also evaluated in a triage and an add-on scenario in LR-3/4 lesions. The combined evaluation of three other senior readers was used as reference standard.Results: A total of 318 patients bearing 429 lesions were included. Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 in the test set were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.72) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.96) respectively, with 242 (70.1%) lesions accurately categorised. Using the ML algorithm in a triage scenario improved the overall performance for LR-5. (0.86 and 0.93 sensitivity, 0.82 and 0.76 specificity, 78% and 82.3% accuracy for the two independent readers).Conclusions: Quantitative assessment of CT LI-RADS v2018 major features is feasible and diagnoses LR-5 observations with high performance especially in combination with the radiologist's visual analysis in patients at high-risk for HCC.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Abbreviated-protocol screening MRI vs. complete-protocol diagnostic MRI for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: An equivalence study using LI-RADS v2018
    Khatri, Gaurav
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Ananthakrishnan, Lakshmi
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Fetzer, David T.
    Leyendecker, John
    Singal, Amit G.
    Xi, Yin
    Yopp, Adam
    Yokoo, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 51 (02) : 415 - 425
  • [22] White paper of the Society of Abdominal Radiology hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis disease-focused panel on LI-RADS v2018 for CT and MRI
    Elsayes, Khaled M.
    Kielar, Ania Z.
    Elmohr, Mohab M.
    Chernyak, Victoria
    Masch, William R.
    Furlan, Alessandro
    Marks, Robert M.
    Cruite, Irene
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Tang, An
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Hecht, Elizabeth M.
    Kamaya, Aya
    Jambhekar, Kedar
    Kamath, Amita
    Arora, Sandeep
    Bijan, Bijan
    Ash, Ryan
    Kassam, Zahra
    Chaudhry, Humaira
    McGahan, John P.
    Yacoub, Joseph H.
    McInnes, Matthew
    Fung, Alice W.
    Shanbhogue, Krishna
    Lee, James
    Deshmukh, Sandeep
    Horvat, Natally
    Mitchell, Donald G.
    Do, Richard K. G.
    Surabhi, Venkateswar R.
    Szklaruk, Janio
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (10) : 2625 - 2642
  • [23] A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based model using LI-RADS v2018 features for preoperatively predicting Ki-67 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Yingying Liang
    Fan Xu
    Qiuju Mou
    Zihua Wang
    Chuyin Xiao
    Tingwen Zhou
    Nianru Zhang
    Jing Yang
    Hongzhen Wu
    BMC Medical Imaging, 24
  • [24] White paper of the Society of Abdominal Radiology hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis disease-focused panel on LI-RADS v2018 for CT and MRI
    Khaled M. Elsayes
    Ania Z. Kielar
    Mohab M. Elmohr
    Victoria Chernyak
    William R. Masch
    Alessandro Furlan
    Robert M. Marks
    Irene Cruite
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    An Tang
    Mustafa R. Bashir
    Elizabeth M. Hecht
    Aya Kamaya
    Kedar Jambhekar
    Amita Kamath
    Sandeep Arora
    Bijan Bijan
    Ryan Ash
    Zahra Kassam
    Humaira Chaudhry
    John P. McGahan
    Joseph H. Yacoub
    Matthew McInnes
    Alice W. Fung
    Krishna Shanbhogue
    James Lee
    Sandeep Deshmukh
    Natally Horvat
    Donald G. Mitchell
    Richard K. G. Do
    Venkateswar R. Surabhi
    Janio Szklaruk
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 2625 - 2642
  • [25] Utilizing a domain-specific large language model for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of free-text MRI reports: a feasibility study
    Matute-Gonzalez, Mario
    Darnell, Anna
    Comas-Cufi, Marc
    Pazo, Javier
    Soler, Alexandre
    Saborido, Belen
    Mauro, Ezequiel
    Turnes, Juan
    Forner, Alejandro
    Reig, Maria
    Rimola, Jordi
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [26] A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based model using LI-RADS v2018 features for preoperatively predicting Ki-67 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liang, Yingying
    Xu, Fan
    Mou, Qiuju
    Wang, Zihua
    Xiao, Chuyin
    Zhou, Tingwen
    Zhang, Nianru
    Yang, Jing
    Wu, Hongzhen
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [27] Diagnostic performance of LR-5 based on hypointensity on Gd-EOB-DTPAeenhanced MRI in the hepatobiliary phase for sHCC using LI-RADS v2018 criteria
    Lin, B.
    Zhang, W.
    Jiang, Y.
    Qin, Y.
    Mishra, P. K.
    Chen, J. Y.
    Zeng, Y. D.
    Zhou, Z. P.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2025, 81
  • [28] A gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI-based multivariable model using LI-RADS v2018 and other imaging features for preoperative prediction of macrotrabecular-massive hepatocellular carcinoma
    Liang, Yingying
    Xu, Fan
    Wang, Zihua
    Tan, Caihong
    Zhang, Nianru
    Wei, Xinhua
    Jiang, Xinqing
    Wu, Hongzhen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 153
  • [29] LI-RADS v2017 categorisation of HCC using CT: Does moderate to severe fatty liver affect accuracy?
    Kim, Seung Soo
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Shin, Hyeong Cheol
    Choi, Seo-Youn
    Kang, Tae Wook
    Jou, Sung Shick
    Lee, Woong Hee
    Park, Suyeon
    Heo, Nam Hun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 186 - 194
  • [30] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018: differential diagnostic value of ADC values for benign and malignant nodules with moderate probability (LR-3)
    Chen, Xue
    Cai, Quanyu
    Xia, Jinju
    Huang, Huan
    Li, Zhaoxing
    Song, Kairong
    Jia, Ningyang
    Liu, Wanmin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13