Automated CT LI-RADS v2018 scoring of liver observations using machine learning: A multivendor, multicentre retrospective study

被引:4
|
作者
Mule, Sebastien [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ronot, Maxime [4 ,5 ]
Ghosn, Mario [1 ,2 ]
Sartoris, Riccardo [4 ]
Corrias, Giuseppe [4 ]
Reizine, Edouard [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Morard, Vincent [6 ]
Quelever, Ronan [6 ]
Dumont, Laura [6 ]
Londono, Jorge Hernandez [6 ]
Coustaud, Nicolas [6 ]
Vilgrain, Valerie [4 ,5 ]
Luciani, Alain [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hop Univ Henri Mondor, AP HP, Serv Imagerie Med, Creteil, France
[2] Univ Paris Est Creteil, Fac Sante, Creteil, France
[3] INSERM IMRB, U955, Equipe 18, F-94000 Creteil, France
[4] Hop Beaujon, AP HP Nord, Serv Radiol, 100 Bd Gen Leclerc, F-92110 Clichy, France
[5] Univ Paris, CRI, INSERM, U1149, Paris, France
[6] GE Healthcare, Buc, France
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; LI-RADS; Major features; Computed tomography; Machine learning; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100857
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background & Aims: Assessment of computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 major features leads to substantial inter-reader variability and potential decrease in hepatocellular carcinoma diagnostic accuracy. We assessed the performance and added-value of a machine learning (ML)-based algorithm in assessing CT LI-RADS major features and categorisation of liver observations compared with qualitative assessment performed by a panel of radiologists.Methods: High-risk patients as per LI-RADS v2018 with pathologically proven liver lesions who underwent multiphase contrast-enhanced CT at diagnosis between January 2015 and March 2019 in seven centres in five countries were retrospectively included and randomly divided into a training set (n = 84 lesions) and a test set (n = 345 lesions). An ML algorithm was trained to classify non-rim arterial phase hyperenhancement, washout, and enhancing capsule as present, absent, or of uncertain presence. LI-RADS major features and categories were compared with qualitative assessment of two independent readers. The performance of a sequential use of the ML algorithm and independent readers were also evaluated in a triage and an add-on scenario in LR-3/4 lesions. The combined evaluation of three other senior readers was used as reference standard.Results: A total of 318 patients bearing 429 lesions were included. Sensitivity and specificity for LR-5 in the test set were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.72) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.96) respectively, with 242 (70.1%) lesions accurately categorised. Using the ML algorithm in a triage scenario improved the overall performance for LR-5. (0.86 and 0.93 sensitivity, 0.82 and 0.76 specificity, 78% and 82.3% accuracy for the two independent readers).Conclusions: Quantitative assessment of CT LI-RADS v2018 major features is feasible and diagnoses LR-5 observations with high performance especially in combination with the radiologist's visual analysis in patients at high-risk for HCC.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease
    Cao, Jennie
    Shon, Andy
    Yoon, Luke
    Kamaya, Aya
    Tse, Justin R.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (12) : 7622 - 7631
  • [2] CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 vs. CEUS LI-RADS v2017-Can Things Be Put Together?
    Caraiani, Cosmin
    Boca, Bianca
    Bura, Vlad
    Sparchez, Zeno
    Dong, Yi
    Dietrich, Christoph
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2021, 10 (05):
  • [3] Systematic training of LI-RADS CT v2018 improves interobserver agreements and performances in LR categorization for focal liver lesions
    Ba, Te
    Xu, Hui
    Yang, Da-Wei
    Wang, Zhen-Chang
    Yang, Zhenghan
    Ren, A-Hong
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 42 (05) : 476 - 486
  • [4] Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic hepatitis C virus infection
    Cao, Jennie J.
    Shon, Andy
    Yoon, Luke
    Kamaya, Aya
    Tse, Justin R.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, : 1615 - 1623
  • [5] Interrater reliability and agreement of the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018 for the evaluation of hepatic lesions
    Abdelrahman, Ahmed S.
    Madkour, Sherihan S.
    Ekladious, Mena E. Y.
    POLISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 87 : E316 - E324
  • [6] Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018: Review of the CT/MRI Diagnostic Categories
    Kanmaniraja, Devaraju
    Dellacerra, Gary
    Holder, Justin
    Erlichman, David
    Chernyak, Victoria
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2021, 72 (01): : 142 - 149
  • [7] Prevalence of different LI-RADS v2018 categories in high-risk patients undergoing CT- or MRI-based screening for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Shahbazian, Haneyeh
    Birnbaum, Jason
    Burns, Patricia J.
    Shabanan, Sedighe Hosseini
    Kanmaniraja, Devaraju
    Reinus, John
    Kamel, Ihab
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Chernyak, Victoria
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (12) : 3696 - 3702
  • [8] Tumor in vein (LR-TIV) and liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: diagnostic features, pitfalls, prognostic and management implications
    Catania, Roberta
    Chupetlovska, Kalina
    Borhani, Amir A.
    Maheshwari, Ekta
    Furlan, Alessandro
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (12) : 5723 - 5734
  • [9] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Na Eun Oh
    Sang Hyun Choi
    Sehee Kim
    Habeen Lee
    Hyeon Ji Jang
    Jae Ho Byun
    Hyung Jin Won
    Yong Moon Shin
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 : 465 - 474
  • [10] Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates
    Oh, Na Eun
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Kim, Sehee
    Lee, Habeen
    Jang, Hyeon Ji
    Byun, Jae Ho
    Won, Hyung Jin
    Shin, Yong Moon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 465 - 474