Evaluation of anaerobic digestion performance and techno-economic analysis of different components of sugarcane leaf

被引:2
作者
Lu, Bing [1 ]
Zhou, Lang [1 ]
Mao, Junru [1 ]
Lei, Ke [1 ]
Pan, Shiyou [1 ]
Mo, Li [1 ]
Du, Liqin [1 ]
Wei, Yutuo [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Univ, Coll Life Sci & Technol, Guangxi Microorganism & Enzyme Res Ctr Engn Techno, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Biogas production; Lignocellulose; Sugarcane waste; Biochemical methane potential; Component separation; METHANE PRODUCTION; RICE STRAW; CO-DIGESTION; PRETREATMENT; LEAVES; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138691
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
ABS T R A C T Sugarcane leaf (SL) is an attractive lignocellulosic feedstock for methane production by anaerobic digestion (AD), but the resistant structure and irregular components of SL hinder its effective use. To provide a comprehensive understanding of the different SL components, the physicochemical properties, methane production perfor-mance, and a techno-economic analysis (TEA) of the mesophyll (SL-MPL) and midrib (SL-MRB) parts of SL were investigated in this study. The results showed that the chemical components, physical properties, and structures of SL-MPL and SL-MRB were markedly different. After AD, SL-MPL showed methane production of 124.2 +/- 8.5 mL/g volatile solid (VS), which was 121.4% higher than that of SL-MRB. Besides, the VS removal and hydrolysis rates for SL-MPL were 1.4 and 2.9 times higher than those for SL-MRB, respectively. The AD of SL-MRB was predominantly limited by its high lignin content, low nutrient element contents, smooth surface, and dense spatial structure. The TEA revealed that the revenue from SL-MPL was 74.9% of total revenue in the AD scenario, which was three times that of SL-MRB. Therefore, SL-MPL was more techno-economically efficient than SL-MRB under the AD scenario. This study provides a theoretical basis and data support for the effective utilization of SL.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Performance of enhanced anaerobic digestion with different pyrolysis biochars and microbial communities
    Shen, Ruixia
    Jing, Yong
    Feng, Jing
    Luo, Juan
    Yu, Jiadong
    Zhao, Lixin
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 296
  • [42] Effect of different aerobic hydrolysis time on the anaerobic digestion characteristics and energy consumption analysis
    Qu, Jingbo
    Sun, Yong
    Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar
    Liu, Yuyingnan
    Xu, Xinrui
    Meng, Xianghui
    Zhang, Hongqiong
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 320
  • [43] Techno-economic evaluation of different hybridization schemes for a solar thermal/gas power plant
    Rashid, Khalid
    Safdarnejad, Seyed Mostafa
    Ellingwood, Kevin
    Powell, Kody M.
    ENERGY, 2019, 181 : 91 - 106
  • [44] A TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ON THE SELECTION OF WIND TURBINES
    Omar, Muhammed Arslan
    Saltan, Gokhan
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024, 23 (09): : 1837 - 1848
  • [45] What drives the viability of waste-to-energy? Modelling techno-economic scenarios of anaerobic digestion and energy generation for the Scottish islands
    Matthew, Chris
    Spataru, Catalina
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 410
  • [46] A critical review on the techno-economic feasibility of nutrients recovery from anaerobic digestate in the agricultural sector
    Rizzioli, Fabio
    Bertasini, Davide
    Bolzonella, David
    Frison, Nicola
    Battista, Federico
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 306
  • [47] Biorefinery for combined production of jet fuel and ethanol from lipid-producing sugarcane: a techno-economic evaluation
    Kumar, Deepak
    Long, Stephen P.
    Singh, Vijay
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2018, 10 (02): : 92 - 107
  • [48] Sludge disintegration and anaerobic digestion enhancement by alkaline-thermal pretreatment: Economic evaluation and microbial population analysis
    Park, Jungsu
    Cayetano, Roent Dune A.
    Kim, Gi-Beom
    Jo, Yura
    Kwon, Yeelyung
    Lei, Zhongfang
    Kim, Sang-Hyoun
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 346
  • [49] Two-stage (liquid-solid) anaerobic mono-digestion of ammonia-rich chicken manure at low-temperature: Operational strategy and techno-economic assessment
    Mahato, Prativa
    Adhikary, Suman
    Goyette, Bernard
    Rajagopal, Rajinikanth
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION & RECYCLING ADVANCES, 2023, 19
  • [50] Life cycle and techno-economic analyses of biofuels production via anaerobic digestion and amine scrubbing CO2 capture
    Gholizadeh, Towhid
    Ghiasirad, Hamed
    Skorek-Osikowska, Anna
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 321