Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: The Modern Psycho-Oncologic Approach for Romania-A Review

被引:8
作者
Licu, Monica [1 ]
Ionescu, Claudiu Gabriel [1 ]
Paun, Sorin [2 ]
机构
[1] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Med Ethics, Bucharest 050474, Romania
[2] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Gen Surg, Bucharest 050474, Romania
关键词
quality of life; health-related quality of life; psychosocial factors; psycho-oncology; GENERAL FACT-G; BREAST-CANCER; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; COLORECTAL-CANCER; ADULT PATIENTS; EORTC QLQ-C30; CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; DISTRESS; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol30070504
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Quality of life (QOL) is an important indicator of human satisfaction and well-being. QOL is significantly and persistently affected for patients after a cancer diagnosis. Despite some evidence suggesting that psycho-oncologic interventions can provide lasting benefits, the inclusion of such interventions in cancer therapy is not universal. This article provides an overview of the known approaches to the evaluation of QOL in cancer patients and various interventions for improving patients' outcomes, with a focus on the eastern European regional and specific Romanian context. With a mortality rate above and cancer care performance below the EU average and unequally distributed, Romania urgently needs a national coordination program, which is discussed in our review, highlighting the main psychological tools needed for the assessment and the challenges involved in implementing the program. In the end, we suggest some directions for the future development of the psycho-oncologic approach in the context of social considerations, policy, and the unexpected financial challenges the nation provides.
引用
收藏
页码:6964 / 6975
页数:12
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Achimas-Cadariu P, 2015, J EVID-BASED PSYCHOT, V15, P267
  • [2] Quality of Care and Quality of Life: Convergence or Divergence?
    Alonazi, Wadi B.
    Thomas, Shane A.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES INSIGHTS, 2014, 7 : 1 - 12
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, PREPRINT
  • [4] The KIDSCREEN-27 Quality of Life Measure for Romanian Children Aged 6: Reliability and Validity of the Romanian Version
    Ardelean, Viorel Petru
    Andrei, Vasile Liviu
    Miuta, Caius Calin
    Boros-Balint, Iuliana
    Deak, Gratiela-Flavia
    Molnar, Andor
    Berki, Tamas
    Gyori, Ferenc
    Geanta, Vlad Adrian
    Dehelean, Cristina Adriana
    Borcan, Florin
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (07)
  • [5] Biswas-Diener R., 2010, PRACTICING POSITIVE
  • [6] Bullinger M, 2014, DIALOGUES CLIN NEURO, V16, P137
  • [7] The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS): Reliability, validity, and utilization
    Carol S Burckhardt
    Kathryn L Anderson
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1 (1)
  • [8] A meta-analytic review of the relationship of cancer coping self-efficacy with distress and quality of life
    Chirico, Andrea
    Lucidi, Fabio
    Merluzzi, Thomas
    Alivernini, Fabio
    De laurentiis, Michelino
    Botti, Gerardo
    Giordano, Antonio
    [J]. ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (22) : 36800 - 36811
  • [9] Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, 2005, REFL PAP REG GUID US
  • [10] Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire module to assess the quality of life of ovarian cancer patients in clinical trials: a progress report
    Cull, A
    Howat, S
    Greimel, E
    Waldenstrom, AC
    Arraras, J
    Kudelka, A
    Chauvenet, L
    Gould, A
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 37 (01) : 47 - +