Developing a tool to measure enactment of complex quality improvement interventions in healthcare

被引:3
作者
MacEachern, Lauren [1 ]
Ginsburg, Liane R. [2 ]
Hoben, Matthias [3 ,4 ]
Doupe, Malcolm [5 ,6 ]
Wagg, Adrian [7 ]
Knopp-Sihota, Jennifer A. [8 ]
Cranley, Lisa [9 ]
Song, Yuting [4 ,10 ]
Estabrooks, Carole A. [4 ]
Berta, Whitney [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] York Univ, Hlth Policy & Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] York Univ, Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Manitoba, Rady Fac Hlth Sci, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
[6] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Ctr Care Res, Bergen, Norway
[7] Univ Alberta, Dept Med, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[8] Athabasca Univ, Fac Hlth Disciplines, Athabasca, AB, Canada
[9] Univ Toronto, Lawrence S Bloomberg Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada
[10] Qingdao Univ, Sch Nursing, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
Quality improvement; Evaluation methodology; Healthcare quality improvement; PDSA; Qualitative research; TREATMENT FIDELITY; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE; DELIVERY; CONTEXT; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002027
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Quality improvement (QI) projects are common in healthcare settings and often involve interdisciplinary teams working together towards a common goal. Many interventions and programmes have been introduced through research to convey QI skills and knowledge to healthcare workers, however, a few studies have attempted to differentiate between what individuals 'learn' or 'know' versus their capacity to apply their learnings in complex healthcare settings. Understanding and differentiating between delivery, receipt, and enactment of QI skills and knowledge is important because while enactment alone does not guarantee desired QI outcomes, it might be reasonably assumed that 'better enactment' is likely to lead to better outcomes. This paper describes the development, application and validation of a tool to measure enactment of core QI skills and knowledge of a complex QI intervention in a healthcare setting. Based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement, existing QI assessment tools, literature on enactment fidelity and our research protocols, 10 indicators related to core QI skills and knowledge were determined. Definitions and assessment criteria were tested and refined in five iterative cycles. Qualitative data from four QI teams in long-term care homes were used to test and validate the tool. The final measurement tool contains 10 QI indicators and a five-point scale. Inter-rater reliability ranged from good to excellent. Usability and acceptability among raters were considered high. This measurement tool assists in identifying strengths and weaknesses of a QI team and allows for targeted feedback on core QI components. The indicators developed in our tool and the approach to tool development may be useful in other health related contexts where similar data are collected.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, BREAKTHROUGH SERIES
[2]  
Barr H., 2005, Effective interprofessional education: Argument, assumption evidence
[3]   Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium [J].
Bellg, AJ ;
Borrelli, B ;
Resnick, B ;
Hecht, J ;
Minicucci, DS ;
Ory, M ;
Ogedegbe, G ;
Orwig, D ;
Ernst, D ;
Czajkowski, S .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 23 (05) :443-451
[4]   Sustainment, Sustainability, and Spread Study (SSaSSy): protocol for a study of factors that contribute to the sustainment, sustainability, and spread of practice changes introduced through an evidence-based quality-improvement intervention in Canadian nursing homes [J].
Berta, Whitney B. ;
Wagg, Adrian ;
Cranley, Lisa ;
Doupe, Malcolm B. ;
Ginsburg, Liane ;
Hoben, Matthias ;
MacEachern, Lauren ;
Chamberlain, Stephanie ;
Clement, Fiona ;
Easterbrook, Adam ;
Keefe, Janice M. ;
Knopp-Sihota, Jennifer ;
Rappon, Tim ;
Reid, Colin ;
Song, Yuting ;
Estabrooks, Carole A. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2019, 14 (01)
[6]   The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: a realist review [J].
Coles, Emma ;
Anderson, Julie ;
Maxwell, Margaret ;
Harris, Fiona M. ;
Gray, Nicola M. ;
Milner, Gill ;
MacGillivray, Stephen .
SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
[7]  
Cone DC., 2021, EMERGEN MED SERV, P432, DOI [10.1002/9781119756279.ch113, DOI 10.1002/9781119756279.CH113]
[8]   SCOPE: Safer care for older persons (in residential) environments: A study protocol [J].
Cranley, Lisa A. ;
Norton, Peter G. ;
Cummings, Greta G. ;
Barnard, Debbie ;
Estabrooks, Carole A. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2011, 6
[9]  
Doupe M, 2022, PILOT FEASIBILITY ST, V8, DOI 10.1186/s40814-022-00975-8
[10]  
Doupnik Stephanie K, 2017, J Grad Med Educ, V9, P79, DOI [10.4300/jgme-d-15-00799.1, 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00799.1]