Dosimetric evaluation of three-phase adaptive radiation therapy in head and neck cancer

被引:5
作者
Gul, Osman Vefa [1 ]
Buyukcizmeci, Nihal [2 ]
Basaran, Hamit [1 ]
机构
[1] Selcuk Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Konya, Turkiye
[2] Selcuk Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Phys, Konya, Turkiye
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Adaptive radiotherapy; Skin dose; Thermoluminescent dosimetry; INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; ORGANS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110588
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the dosimetric benefits of the 3-phase adaptive radiation therapy (ART) technique for head and neck cancer (HNC). In addition, it was aimed to examine the changes in skin dose due to the anatomical changes that occurred in the patients during radiation therapy with Thermo -luminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Fifteen patients with head and neck cancer were included in this prospective study. TLDs were placed on the patient's neck at 5 different points determined during computed tomography (CT). A new CT was recommended for patients with a skin dose increase of more than 10% and a weight loss of more than 5% during treatment. Control CTs CT14 and CT24 were obtained in the patient due to weight loss and increase in skin dose. Offline adaptive replans were generated after fractions 14 and 24 and used for further processing (Aplan 1 and Aplan 2, respectively). All patients received 3-stage ART. Accordingly, iPlan Aplan1 and Aplan2 were applied between 0-14, 15-24 and 25-33 fractions, respectively. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were compared for adaptive (ART: iPlan + Aplan1+Aplan2) and non-adaptive (non-ART) plans. Lateral neck diameter (LND) change was statistically significant, with a decrease of 7.35% (p < 0.001) and 5.44% (p < 0.001) for CT14 and CT24, respectively. The mean weight loss for CT14 compared to CT0 was 7.80%. Weight loss in CT24 compared to CT14 was 5.65%. As a result of the measurements made with TLDs on different days between 0-15 fractions during the application of iPlan, a 15.25% increase in skin dose was measured. During Aplan 1 and Aplan 2 applications, the increase in skin dose was measured as 10.56% and 2.83%, respectively. For ART, the ipsilateral parotid and contralateral parotid Dmean doses were decreased by 1.62 Gy (p < 0.001) and 2.25 Gy (p < 0.001), respectively. During treatment, an increase in skin dose of more than 10% and a weight loss of more than 5% should be considered as a trigger point for initiation of ART. Repeat CT scanning and replanning after fractions 15 and 25 is recommended during intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with HNC. In conclusion, the 3-phase ART approach provides dosimetric benefits to patients with HNC.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Conformity and Homogeneity Indices Consistency Throughout the Course of Head and Neck Cancer Treatment With and Without Using Adaptive Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiation Therapy
    Al-Rawi, Salam Abdulrazzaq Ibrahim
    Abouelenein, Hassan
    Khalil, Magdy Mohammed
    Alabdei, Haidar Hamza
    Sulaiman, Awf Abdulrahman
    Al-Nuaimi, Dalya Saad
    El Nagdy, Mohamed El-Sayed
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 7 (05)
  • [2] Effect of Flattening Filter and Flattening Filter Free beams on radiotherapy-induced peripheral blood cell damage
    Aras, Serhat
    [J]. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2021, 182
  • [3] Dose variations in tumor volumes and organs at risk during IMRT for head-and-neck cancer
    Beltran, Merce
    Ramos, Monica
    Jose Rovira, Juan
    Perez-Hoyos, Santiago
    Sancho, Marc
    Puertas, Enrique
    Benavente, Sergi
    Ginjaume, Merce
    Giralt, Jordi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 13 (06): : 101 - 111
  • [4] Late side effects of radiation treatment for head and neck cancer
    Brook, Itzhak
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 38 (02): : 84 - 92
  • [5] A dosimetric comparison of two-phase adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer
    Chitapanarux, Imjai
    Chomprasert, Kittisak
    Nobnaop, Wannapa
    Wanwilairat, Somsak
    Tharavichitkul, Ekasit
    Jakrabhandu, Somvilai
    Onchan, Wimrak
    Traisathit, Patrinee
    Van Gestel, Dirk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2015, 56 (03) : 529 - 538
  • [6] Three-Phase Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Undergoing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: Dosimetric Analysis
    Deng, Shan
    Liu, Xu
    Lu, Heming
    Huang, Huixian
    Shu, Liuyang
    Jiang, Hailan
    Cheng, Jinjian
    Peng, Luxing
    Pang, Qiang
    Gu, Junzhao
    Qin, Jian
    Lu, Zhiping
    Mo, Ying
    Wu, Danling
    Wei, Yinglin
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2017, 16 (06) : 910 - 916
  • [7] In-vivo dosimetric analysis in total skin electron beam therapy
    Elsayad, Khaled
    Moustakis, Christos
    Simonsen, Manuela
    Baecker, Dagmar
    Haverkamp, Uwe
    Eich, Hans Theodor
    [J]. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 6 : 61 - 65
  • [8] Evaluation of Given Dose Accuracy in Radiation Therapy of Patient with Breast Cancer Using Diode In-vivo Dosimetry
    Farah, Sepideh Rasouli
    Mostaar, Ahmad
    Ameri, Ahmad
    Mafi, Ahmad R.
    Anbiaee, Robab
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (06)
  • [9] Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Evaluation of Triggered Adaptive Replanning in Routine Practice
    Figen, Metin
    Colpan Oksuz, Didem
    Duman, Evrim
    Prestwich, Robin
    Dyker, Karen
    Cardale, Kate
    Ramasamy, Satiavani
    Murray, Patrick
    Sen, Mehmet
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [10] Determining appropriate timing of adaptive radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma during intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Huang, Huixian
    Lu, Heming
    Feng, Guosheng
    Jiang, Hailan
    Chen, Jiaxin
    Cheng, Jinjian
    Pang, Qiang
    Lu, Zhiping
    Gu, Junzhao
    Peng, Luxing
    Deng, Shan
    Mo, Ying
    Wu, Danling
    Wei, Yinglin
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10