A Trauma-Informed Inquiry of COVID-19's Initial Impact on Adult Education Program Administrators and Instructors in the United States

被引:4
作者
Housel, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] LaGuardia Community Coll, 31-10 Thomson Ave,Room C-224, Long Isl City, NY 11101 USA
关键词
COVID-19; adults; program administrators; instructors; digital literacy; ONLINE; LEARNERS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1177/10451595211073724
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on adult education programs globally, transforming in-person operations to distance, online enterprises often overnight. Many administrators, instructors, and program staff have been inordinately burdened physically, economically, and socially by the pandemic in ways that could be considered traumatic. The pandemic has also revealed how the insufficient access to educational technology and limited digital literacy has affected program administrators, instructors, and adult students alike. Can the pandemic create the opportunity to elevate adult learning and restructure existing policies and practices moving forward? To grapple with the answers to this question, this exploratory qualitative study sought the perspectives and insights of program administrators and instructors in adult education programs in the northeastern United States. Through an online, mostly open-ended questionnaire, self-reflections of lessons learned were analyzed through a trauma-informed lens (Gross, 2020). Through multiple rounds of coding, the following themes emerged: (1) balancing multiple stressors; (2) coping with pandemic uncertainty; and (3) addressing virtual classroom engagement, remote work, and the digital divide. Recommendations for modifying preservice preparation and ongoing professional development and making programmatic policies and instructional practices that promote distance teaching/learning and digital literacy in more trauma-responsive and inclusive ways were proposed as were areas for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 78
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Abdrahim N.A., 2020, Journal of Educators Online, V17, P1
  • [2] Diep AN, 2019, AUST J ADULT LEARN, V59, P223
  • [3] Investigating the relationship between success factors and student participation in online and blended learning in adult education
    Blieck, Yves
    Kauwenberghs, Kurt
    Zhu, Chang
    Struyven, Katrien
    Pynoo, Bram
    DePryck, Koen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2019, 35 (04) : 476 - 490
  • [4] COVID-19 and the Future of Adult Education: An Editorial
    Boeren, Ellen
    Roumell, Elizabeth A.
    Roessger, Kevin M.
    [J]. ADULT EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2020, 70 (03) : 201 - 204
  • [5] Bonk C., 2016, J OPEN FLEXIBLE DIST, V20, P6
  • [6] Burke CM., 2019, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, V20, P27
  • [7] Day BW, 2011, J CONTIN HIGH EDUC, V59, P77, DOI 10.1080/07377363.2011.568813
  • [8] Doo MY, 2020, INT REV RES OPEN DIS, V21, P60
  • [9] The effects of self-efficacy,self-regulationand social presence on learning engagement in a large university class using flipped Learning
    Doo, Min Young
    Bonk, Curtis J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2020, 36 (06) : 997 - 1010
  • [10] Presence+Experience: A Framework for the Purposeful Design of Presence in Online Courses
    Dunlap, Joanna C.
    Verma, Geeta
    Johnson, Heather Lynn
    [J]. TECHTRENDS, 2016, 60 (02) : 145 - 151