Narrative medicine interventions for oncology clinicians: a systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Paul, Trisha K. [1 ]
Reddy, Yashaswi [2 ]
Gnanakumar, Anthara [3 ]
England, Rebecca [4 ]
Superdock, Alexandra [1 ]
Malipeddi, Dhatri [5 ]
Wrigley, Jordan [1 ]
Reardon, Erin [6 ]
Weaver, Meaghann S. [7 ]
Kaye, Erica C. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Jude Childrens Res Hosp, Dept Oncol, Div Qual Life & Palliat Care, 262 Danny Thomas Pl,Mail Stop 260, Memphis, TN 38105 USA
[2] Kakatiya Med Coll, Warangal, Telangana, India
[3] George Washington Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[4] Univ Tennessee, Hlth Sci Ctr, Memphis, TN USA
[5] Rochester Gen Hosp, Rochester, NY USA
[6] Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA USA
[7] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
Narrative medicine; Cancer; Oncology; Clinicians; Storytelling; Reflection; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-024-08434-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeAs narrative medicine interventions are integrated increasingly into medical practice, growing evidence indicates benefits for healthcare professionals. Presently, the prevalence and impact of narrative medicine interventions in the field of oncology remain unknown. This systematic review synthesizes published data on narrative medicine interventions in oncology and reports current knowledge on feasibility, acceptability, and impact on cancer care professionals.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, we searched Ovid Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from inception through February 2024. Eligible articles were published in English and contained original data on feasibility, acceptability, and/or impact of a narrative medicine intervention for oncology professionals. Database searches identified 2614 deduplicated articles, from which 50 articles were identified for full-text assessment and 11 articles met inclusion criteria. Two additional articles were identified through manual review of references.ResultsThirteen articles described 12 unique narrative medicine interventions targeting cancer care professionals. All studies described their respective interventions as feasible, acceptable, and impactful for participants. Interventions involved writing, reading, reflection, and other narrative-based strategies. Standardized validated tools evaluated outcomes including burnout, empathy expression, secondary trauma, quality of humanistic care, and well-being. Participants reported appreciation of opportunities for reflection, perspective sharing, and bearing witness, which they perceived to strengthen wellness and community.ConclusionNarrative medicine interventions are feasible and acceptable and may bolster oncology clinicians' functioning across domains. Multi-site, prospective, randomized studies are needed to investigate the broader impact of narrative medicine interventions and advance the science of narrative medicine in oncology.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: CRD42022369432
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effectiveness of safety training interventions for supervisors: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Sinelnikov, Sergey
    Bixler, Emily A.
    Kolosh, Alaina
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2020, 63 (10) : 878 - 901
  • [22] A Systematic Literature Review of Animal-Assisted Interventions in Oncology (Part II): Theoretical Mechanisms and Frameworks
    Holder, Timothy R. N.
    Gruen, Margaret E.
    Roberts, David L.
    Somers, Tamara
    Bozkurt, Alper
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2020, 19
  • [23] Smoking Cessation Interventions and Cessation Rates in the Oncology Population: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nayan, Smriti
    Gupta, Michael K.
    Strychowsky, Julie E.
    Sommer, Doron D.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2013, 149 (02) : 200 - 211
  • [24] Red cell transfusion benefits in oncology, haematology and palliative medicine populations: a narrative review
    Duffy, Ed
    O'Mahony, Frances
    Burke, Caroline
    Conneely, Aoibheann
    O'Connell, Helen
    Twomey, Feargal
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 13 (03) : 291 - 297
  • [25] A systematic review of integrative oncology programs
    Seely, D. M.
    Weeks, L. C.
    Young, S.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (06) : E436 - E461
  • [26] Are there young carers in oncology? A systematic review
    Justin, Pauline
    Lamore, Kristopher
    Dorard, Geraldine
    Untas, Aurelie
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 30 (09) : 1430 - 1441
  • [27] Supportive interventions for carers of men with prostate cancer: systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Winter, Natalie
    Jongebloed, Hannah
    Green, Anna
    Ugalde, Anna
    Livingston, Patricia M.
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 14 (E1) : e173 - e182
  • [28] Improving performance in radiation oncology: An international systematic review of quality improvement interventions
    Dodkins, Joanna
    Zachou, Georgia
    Rashid, Adil
    van der Meulen, Jan
    Nossiter, Julie
    Tree, Alison
    Aggarwal, Ajay
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2025, 206
  • [29] Changing health-promoting behaviours through narrative interventions: A systematic review
    Perrier, Marie-Josee
    Ginis, Kathleen A. Martin
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 23 (11) : 1499 - 1517
  • [30] A practical framework for the design of resistance exercise interventions in oncology research settings-a narrative review
    Fairman, Ciaran M.
    FRONTIERS IN SPORTS AND ACTIVE LIVING, 2024, 6