Examining the impact of perceived psychological distances of quitting and continuing tobacco smoking on antismoking intention: a cross-sectional study

被引:0
作者
File, Domonkos [1 ]
Bothe, Beata [2 ]
Demetrovics, Zsolt [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Inst Psychol, Budapest, Hungary
[2] Univ Montreal, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Gibraltar, Ctr Excellence Responsible Gaming, Gibraltar, Gibraltar
关键词
FEAR APPEAL; PERCEPTIONS; ADDICTION; CESSATION; PREDICTORS; RESPONSES; MESSAGES; BEHAVIOR; SMOKERS; RISK;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-50440-6
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
To date, little research has been conducted to understand the role of psychological distances on smoking behaviour. Construal Level Theory posits that individuals mentally construe events, objects, or ideas based on their perceived distance in terms of spatial, temporal, social, and hypothetical dimensions, influencing their judgments and decision-making processes. The aim of the current study was (1) to provide a comprehensive exploration of psychological distances of costs and benefits of tobacco smoking and antismoking intention and (2) to examine whether smoking can be attributed to rational behaviour based on the psychological distance weighted balance of perceived costs and benefits of quitting and continuing smoking. Mediation models delineating the relationships among temporal and hypothetical psychological distances, personal relevance and antismoking intention were tested on cross-sectional survey data of 1486 smokers (880 men, Mage = 39.9 years, SD = 13.36). Psychological distances were shown to be important factors in the cognitive evaluation process of smoking behaviour. Perceived temporal distance to smoking continuation/cessation was related to personal importance and hypothetical psychological distances, which were associated with anti-smoking intention. Furthermore, antismoking intention was related to the psychological distance-weighted gain-cost balance of quitting and continuing smoking. The current findings enhance our knowledge of the cognitive evaluation of the outcomes of smoking, indicating that the choice of not quitting smoking may be partially based on a biased rational decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, World drug report
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The All New Don't Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate
[3]  
Bartal M, 2001, Monaldi Arch Chest Dis, V56, P545
[4]   Rationally addicted to drinking and smoking? [J].
Bask, M ;
Melkersson, M .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2004, 36 (04) :373-381
[5]   Exploring antismoking ads: Appeals, themes, and consequences [J].
Beaudoin, CE .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2002, 7 (02) :123-137
[6]   A THEORY OF RATIONAL ADDICTION [J].
BECKER, GS ;
MURPHY, KM .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1988, 96 (04) :675-700
[7]   Liking, Wanting, and the Incentive-Sensitization Theory of Addiction [J].
Berridge, Kent C. ;
Robinson, Terry E. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2016, 71 (08) :670-679
[8]  
Brandon T., 1991, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENT, V3, P484, DOI [10.1037/1040-3590.3.3.484, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.3.3.484]
[9]  
Brown T. A., 2015, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR, V2nd
[10]   Further Than the Eye Can See: Psychological Distance and Perception of Environmental Threats [J].
Carmi, Nurit ;
Kimhi, Shaul .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2015, 21 (08) :2239-2257