The completely patient-reported version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score: A valid and reliable measurement for ankle osteoarthritis

被引:7
|
作者
Paget, Liam D. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,8 ]
Sierevelt, Inger N. [4 ,5 ]
Tol, Johannes L. [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Reurink, Gustaaf [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Orthoped Surg, Amsterdam Movement Sci, POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Acad Ctr Evidence Based Sports Med ACES, POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] AMC VUmc IOC Res Ctr, Amsterdam Collaborat Hlth & Safety Sports ACHSS, POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Spaarne Ziekenhuis, Spaarne Gasthuis Acad, Orthoped Dept, NL-2134 TM Hoofddorp, Netherlands
[5] Xpert Clin, Specialised Ctr Orthoped Res & Educ Stichting SCOR, Orthoped Dept, NL-2134 TM Hoofddorp, Netherlands
[6] Aspetar, Orthoped & Sports Med Hosp, POB 29222, Doha, Qatar
[7] OLVG, Sports Phys Grp, Dept Sports Med, NL-1061 AE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Amsterdam UMC, Dept Orthopaed, POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Ankle; Ankle osteoarthritis; Clinimetrics; Orthopaedic surgery; Sports medicine; CLINICAL RATING SYSTEMS; DUTCH LANGUAGE VERSION; FUNCTION INDEX; RESPONSIVENESS; RELIABILITY; HINDFOOT; SF-36; TRANSLATION; COEFFICIENT; COSMIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jisako.2023.07.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle score (AOFAS) is an outcome measure for ankle and hindfoot conditions, which requires scoring from both the patients and the physician. A completely patientreported version has been developed and used before, but its measurements properties are unknown. Our goal was to determine the measurement properties and the minimally important change (MIC) of a completely patientreported AOFAS (PR-AOFAS) in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. Additionally, the MIC of both the PR-AOFAS and the AOFAS was estimated, which had not previously been done.Materials and methods: The PR-AOFAS of 112 patients was evaluated for reliability, construct validity (using the AOFAS, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Ankle Osteoarthritis Score, Visual Analogue Scale, and Short Form-36), and responsiveness. The MIC was estimated using the optimal cut-off point of the receiver operating characteristic curve. This was a substudy of a randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma injections for ankle osteoarthritis (OA).Results: The PR-AOFAS had sufficient construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness. The smallest detectable change at group level was 2.34. The MIC was 6.5 points (95% confidence interval: 0.6-14.4).Conclusions: The measurement properties of the Dutch PR-AOFAS were sufficient in patients with ankle osteoarthritis who are willing to participate in a trial on injection therapy. The minimally important change of the PRAOFAS is smaller than its smallest detectable change, making it more suitable for use in groups of patients, such as a research setting. Level of clinical evidence: 1.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 351
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validity and Reliability of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Score for the English-Literate Singapore Population With Hallux Valgus
    Tan, Chin Chuen
    Sayampanathan, Andrew Arjun
    Kwan, Yu Heng
    Yeo, William
    Rikhraj, Inderjeet Singh
    Yeo, Nicholas Eng Meng
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2024, 17 (04) : 329 - 335
  • [22] Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of Turkish Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale
    Akbaba, Yildiz Analay
    Celik, Derya
    Ogut, R. Tahir
    JOURNAL OF FOOT & ANKLE SURGERY, 2016, 55 (06) : 1139 - 1142
  • [23] Validity and internal consistency of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Midfoot Scale in patients with Lisfranc injury
    Ponkilainen, Ville T.
    Uimonen, Mikko
    Repo, Jussi P.
    Mattila, Ville M.
    Haapasalo, Heidi H.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2020, 26 (05) : 523 - 529
  • [24] EFAS Score - Validation of Danish Version by the Score Committee of the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS)
    Richter, Martinus
    Agren, Per-Henrik
    Besse, Jean-Luc
    Coester, Maria
    Kofoed, Hakon
    Maffulli, Nicola
    Steultjens, Martijn
    Nielsen, Mick
    Johansen, Jens Kurt
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2024, 30 (04) : 294 - 298
  • [25] Ankle fractures: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures and their measurement properties
    Nguyen, Michael Quan
    Dalen, Ingvild
    Iversen, Marjolein Memelink
    Harboe, Knut
    Paulsen, Aksel
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (01) : 27 - 45
  • [26] Structural validity of the foot and ankle outcome score for orthopaedic pathologies with Rasch Measurement Theory
    Tapaninaho, Krista
    Saarinen, Antti J.
    Ilves, Outi
    Uimonen, Mikko M.
    Hakkinen, Arja H.
    Sandelin, Henrik
    Repo, Jussi P.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2022, 28 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [27] Minimally important change, measurement error, and responsiveness for the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score
    Coster, Maria C.
    Nilsdotter, Anna
    Brudin, Lars
    Bremander, Ann
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2017, 88 (03) : 300 - 304
  • [28] Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Midfoot Scale
    Vosoughi, Amir Reza
    Yoosefinejad, Amin Kordi
    Dehbarez, Yasaman Safaei
    Kargarshouraki, Zeinab
    Mahdaviazad, Hamideh
    FOOT & ANKLE SPECIALIST, 2024, 17 (05) : 442 - 450
  • [29] Patient-reported outcome measures for the evaluation of foot and ankle function-recommendations from the research committee of the AGA
    Ackermann, Jakob
    Guenther, Daniel
    Laky, Brenda
    Mathis, Dominic
    Deichsel, Adrian
    Akguen, Doruk
    Schuettler, Karl Friedrich
    Wafaisade, Arasch
    Eggeling, Lena
    Kopf, Sebastian
    Herbst, Elmar
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2023, 36 (02) : 128 - 134
  • [30] Large variation in use of patient-reported outcome measures: A survey of 188 foot and ankle surgeons
    Zwiers, R.
    Weel, H.
    Mallee, W. H.
    Kerkhoffs, G. M. M. J.
    van Dijk, C. N.
    FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY, 2018, 24 (03) : 246 - 251