Prediction of groundwater level variations using deep learning methods and GMS numerical model

被引:21
|
作者
Amiri, Siamak [1 ]
Rajabi, Ahmad [1 ]
Shabanlou, Saeid [1 ]
Yosefvand, Fariborz [1 ]
Izadbakhsh, Mohammad Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Water Engn, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah, Iran
关键词
GWL prediction; GMS; Hybrid Models; LSTM; LS-SVM; ORELM; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SURFACE-WATER; MACHINE; RESOURCES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s12145-023-01052-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
One of the key elements of the hydrogeological cycle and a variable used by many water resource operating models is the variation in groundwater level (GWL). One of the biggest obstacles to the drawdown analysis and GWL forecasts is the absence of accurate and complete data. The application of diverse numerical models has been regarded as a reliable approach in recent years. Such models are able to determine the GWL for any given region by utilising a wide variety of statistics, data, and field measurements such as pumping experiments, geophysics, soil and land use maps, topography and slope data, a plethora of boundary conditions, and the application of complex equations. Artificial intelligence-based models need significantly less information. The purpose of this research is to predict the changes of GWL of Shazand plain by using the PSO-ANN, ACA-ANN hybrid methods and deep learning methods LSTM, LS-SVM, and ORELM and comparing with GMS numerical model. The model's accuracy is evaluated using a two-stage validation and verification process. Then Taylor's diagram was used to select the best model. Results show that ORELM with R, Nash, RMSE and NRMSE values equal to 0.977, 0.955, 0.512 and 0.058 respectively was the best performance in the test stage. After that is the PSO-ANN model. Using the Taylor diagram is another certain way to guarantee that you've picked the best possible model. The research results show that there is a link between the ORELM and the place that is most central to the reference point. Since the GMS model is complex and requires a large amount of data and a time-consuming calibration and validation process, the ORELM model can be utilised with certainty to predict the GWL across the entire plain. This research suggests that instead of using numerical models with a complex and time-consuming structure, deep learning methods with the least required data and with high accuracy should be used to forecast the groundwater level.
引用
收藏
页码:3227 / 3241
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Deep Learning Model for Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease Using Heart Sound
    Ravi, Rohit
    Madhavan, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 15 (03) : 660 - 666
  • [22] A hybrid model integrating deep learning with investor sentiment analysis for stock price prediction
    Jing, Nan
    Wu, Zhao
    Wang, Hefei
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 178
  • [23] Lightweight deep learning model for automatic landslide prediction and localization
    Varangaonkar, Payal
    Rode, S. V.
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 82 (21) : 33245 - 33266
  • [24] Using Deep Learning Algorithms for Intermittent Streamflow Prediction in the Headwaters of the Colorado River, Texas
    Forghanparast, Farhang
    Mohammadi, Ghazal
    WATER, 2022, 14 (19)
  • [25] A Comprehensive Review of Conventional, Machine Leaning, and Deep Learning Models for Groundwater Level (GWL) Forecasting
    Khan, Junaid
    Lee, Eunkyu
    Balobaid, Awatef Salem
    Kim, Kyungsup
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [26] Bike-Sharing Demand Prediction at Community Level under COVID-19 Using Deep Learning
    Mehdizadeh Dastjerdi, Aliasghar
    Morency, Catherine
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (03)
  • [27] Energy Consumption Forecasting using a Deep Learning Energy-Level Based Prediction
    Rane, Rahul
    Desai, Maitraya
    Pandey, Abhishek
    Kazi, Faruk
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL POWER AND RENEWABLE ENERGY CONFERENCE (IPRECON), 2021,
  • [28] Forecasting of groundwater level variation under changing climate in Chhattisgarh state using deep learning technique
    Dey, Mukesh Kumar
    Singh, Chandan Kumar
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2025, 56 (03): : 279 - 296
  • [29] Deep dive into predictive excellence: Transformer's impact on groundwater level prediction
    Sun, Wei
    Chang, Li-Chiu
    Chang, Fi-John
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2024, 636
  • [30] Spatial prediction of groundwater potentiality using machine learning methods with Grey Wolf and Sparrow Search Algorithms
    Liu, Rui
    Li, Gulin
    Wei, Liangshuai
    Xu, Yuan
    Gou, Xiaojuan
    Luo, Shubin
    Yang, Xin
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2022, 610