Prediction of groundwater level variations using deep learning methods and GMS numerical model

被引:21
|
作者
Amiri, Siamak [1 ]
Rajabi, Ahmad [1 ]
Shabanlou, Saeid [1 ]
Yosefvand, Fariborz [1 ]
Izadbakhsh, Mohammad Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Water Engn, Kermanshah Branch, Kermanshah, Iran
关键词
GWL prediction; GMS; Hybrid Models; LSTM; LS-SVM; ORELM; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SURFACE-WATER; MACHINE; RESOURCES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s12145-023-01052-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
One of the key elements of the hydrogeological cycle and a variable used by many water resource operating models is the variation in groundwater level (GWL). One of the biggest obstacles to the drawdown analysis and GWL forecasts is the absence of accurate and complete data. The application of diverse numerical models has been regarded as a reliable approach in recent years. Such models are able to determine the GWL for any given region by utilising a wide variety of statistics, data, and field measurements such as pumping experiments, geophysics, soil and land use maps, topography and slope data, a plethora of boundary conditions, and the application of complex equations. Artificial intelligence-based models need significantly less information. The purpose of this research is to predict the changes of GWL of Shazand plain by using the PSO-ANN, ACA-ANN hybrid methods and deep learning methods LSTM, LS-SVM, and ORELM and comparing with GMS numerical model. The model's accuracy is evaluated using a two-stage validation and verification process. Then Taylor's diagram was used to select the best model. Results show that ORELM with R, Nash, RMSE and NRMSE values equal to 0.977, 0.955, 0.512 and 0.058 respectively was the best performance in the test stage. After that is the PSO-ANN model. Using the Taylor diagram is another certain way to guarantee that you've picked the best possible model. The research results show that there is a link between the ORELM and the place that is most central to the reference point. Since the GMS model is complex and requires a large amount of data and a time-consuming calibration and validation process, the ORELM model can be utilised with certainty to predict the GWL across the entire plain. This research suggests that instead of using numerical models with a complex and time-consuming structure, deep learning methods with the least required data and with high accuracy should be used to forecast the groundwater level.
引用
收藏
页码:3227 / 3241
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of groundwater level variations using deep learning methods and GMS numerical model
    Siamak Amiri
    Ahmad Rajabi
    Saeid Shabanlou
    Fariborz Yosefvand
    Mohammad Ali Izadbakhsh
    Earth Science Informatics, 2023, 16 : 3227 - 3241
  • [2] Prediction of groundwater level fluctuations using artificial intelligence-based models and GMS
    Mohammed, Khabat Star
    Shabanlou, Saeid
    Rajabi, Ahmad
    Yosefvand, Fariborz
    Izadbakhsh, Mohammad Ali
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2023, 13 (02)
  • [3] Groundwater Level Prediction with Deep Learning Methods
    Chen, Hsin-Yu
    Vojinovic, Zoran
    Lo, Weicheng
    Lee, Jhe-Wei
    WATER, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [4] Prediction of groundwater level fluctuations using artificial intelligence-based models and GMS
    Khabat Star Mohammed
    Saeid Shabanlou
    Ahmad Rajabi
    Fariborz Yosefvand
    Mohammad Ali Izadbakhsh
    Applied Water Science, 2023, 13
  • [5] Insight to groundwater level prediction with feature effectiveness: comparison of machine learning and numerical methods
    Goodarzi, Mohammadreza
    Bafrouei, Hamid Reza Bana
    Vazirian, Majid
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2024, : 74 - 92
  • [6] Development of a Multi-Scale Groundwater Drought Prediction Model Using Deep Learning and Hydrometeorological Data
    Kang, Dayoung
    Byun, Kyuhyun
    WATER, 2024, 16 (14)
  • [7] GROUNDWATER LEVEL PREDICTION USING DEEP RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS AND UNCERTAINTY ASSESSMENT
    Eghrari, Z.
    Delavar, M. R.
    Zare, M.
    Mousavi, M.
    Nazari, B.
    Ghaffarian, S.
    GEOSPATIAL WEEK 2023, VOL. 10-1, 2023, : 493 - 500
  • [8] Methods of process mining and prediction using deep learning
    Cieplak, Tomasz
    Rymarczyk, Tomasz
    Klosowski, Grzegorz
    Maj, Michal
    Pliszczuk, Damian
    Rymarczyk, Pawel
    PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2021, 97 (03): : 146 - 149
  • [9] Prediction of Water Level Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques
    Ayus, Ishan
    Natarajan, Narayanan
    Gupta, Deepak
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2023, 47 (04) : 2437 - 2447
  • [10] Chicken pox prediction using deep learning model
    Lee M.
    Kim J.W.
    Jang B.
    Jang, Beakcheol (bjang@smu.ac.kr), 2020, Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers (69) : 127 - 137