Minimally invasive versus open total pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
作者
Chen, Lang [1 ,2 ]
Xia, Ning [1 ]
Wang, Zihe [1 ]
Xiong, Junjie [1 ,3 ]
Tian, Bole [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Pancreat Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Cheng Du Xinjin Dist Tradit Chinese Med Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
laparoscopic; robot-assisted; robotic; total pancreatectomy; TO-SIDE GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY; GENERAL-SURGERY; OUTCOMES; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; EXPERIENCE; RESECTION; PANCREAS; STILL;
D O I
10.1097/JS9.0000000000000392
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective:The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety and effectiveness regarding outcomes of minimally invasive total pancreatectomy (MITP) versus open total pancreatectomy (OTP). Background:Total pancreatectomy is a complicated operation in abdominal surgery. The flexibility of minimally invasive surgery offers a new surgical approach to this technology. At present, there is little research on MITP, and its advantages over OTP remain uncertain. Methods:A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted basing on comparative studies between MITP and OTP from January 1943 to November 2022. Intraoperative outcomes and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences with a 95% CI were calculated using fixed-effect or random-effect models under heterogeneity. Results:Seven studies with a total of 4275 patients were included. The major morbidity in the MITP group was significant lower (OR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.30-0.84, P=0.008, I-2= 0%) than OTP group. At the same time, comparing with OTP, the MITP group had lower estimated blood loss (MD -362.50, 95% CI -641.34 to -83.66, P=0.01, I-2=96%) and lower intraoperative transfusion rate (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.84, P=0.02, I-2=0%). There were no significant differences between the MITP and OTP groups for other outcomes. Conclusions:The results suggested that MITP was associated with lower major morbidity, estimated blood loss, and intraoperative transfusion rate comparing with OTP. However, the further evidence with a better design is required.
引用
收藏
页码:2058 / 2069
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Ricci, Claudio ;
Casadei, Riccardo ;
Taffurelli, Giovanni ;
Toscano, Fabrizio ;
Pacilio, Carlo Alberto ;
Bogoni, Selene ;
D'Ambra, Marielda ;
Pagano, Nico ;
Di Marco, Maria Cristina ;
Minni, Francesco .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (04) :770-781
[42]   Transvaginal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chang, Jasmine Hui Er ;
Xu, Hongyun ;
Zhao, Yun ;
Wee, Ian Jun Yan ;
Ang, Joella Xiaohong ;
Tan, Emile Kwong-Wei ;
Seow-En, Isaac .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2024, 409 (01)
[43]   Minimally invasive pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Wang, Min ;
Xi, Yu ;
Huang, Nanxiang ;
Wang, Pengli ;
Zhang, Li ;
Zhao, Mingjia ;
Pu, Siyi .
PEERJ, 2023, 11
[44]   Minimally Invasive Intermuscular Approaches Versus Conventional Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Clesham, Kevin ;
Sheridan, Gerard A. ;
Greidanus, Nelson, V ;
Masri, Bassam A. ;
Garbuz, Donald S. ;
Duncan, Clive P. ;
Howard, Lisa C. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (08) :1658-1666
[45]   Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy: Meta-Analysis of Outcomes [J].
Sgourakis, George ;
Gockel, Ines ;
Radtke, Arnold ;
Musholt, Thomas J. ;
Timm, Stephan ;
Rink, Andreas ;
Tsiamis, Achilleas ;
Karaliotas, Constantine ;
Lang, Hauke .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2010, 55 (11) :3031-3040
[46]   A comparative analysis and survival analysis of open versus minimally invasive radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Zhou, Yating ;
Xue, Fei .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2025, 14
[47]   Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: An analysis from the US neuroendocrine tumor study group [J].
Zhang, Xu-Feng ;
Lopez-Aguiar, Alexandra G. ;
Poultsides, George ;
Makris, Eleftherios ;
Rocha, Flavio ;
Kanji, Zaheer ;
Weber, Sharon ;
Fields, Ryan ;
Krasnick, Bradley A. ;
Idrees, Kamran ;
Smith, Paula M. ;
Cho, Cliff ;
Schmidt, Carl R. ;
Maithel, Shishir K. ;
Pawlik, Timothy M. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 120 (02) :231-240
[48]   Evaluating the economic efficiency of open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis [J].
Koh, Ye Xin ;
Zhao, Yun ;
Tan, Ivan En-Howe ;
Tan, Hwee Leong ;
Chua, Darren Weiquan ;
Loh, Wei-Liang ;
Tan, Ek Khoon ;
Teo, Jin Yao ;
Au, Marianne Kit Har ;
Goh, Brian Kim Poh .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (06) :3035-3051
[49]   Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Nickel, Felix ;
Haney, Caelan Max ;
Kowalewski, Karl Friedrich ;
Probst, Pascal ;
Limen, Eldridge Frederick ;
Kalkum, Eva ;
Diener, Marcus K. ;
Strobel, Oliver ;
Mueller-Stich, Beat Peter ;
Hackert, Thilo .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (01) :54-66
[50]   Minimally Invasive Versus Open Adrenalectomy in Patients with Adrenocortical Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis [J].
Hu, Xu ;
Yang, Wei-Xiao ;
Shao, Yan-Xiang ;
Dou, Wei-Chao ;
Xiong, San-Chao ;
Li, Xiang .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (10) :3858-3869