Canal transportation and centering ability of neoendo rotary files in deciduous teeth: An in vitro study using cone beam computed tomography

被引:0
作者
Janiani, Palak [1 ]
Ramakrishnan, Mahesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Saveetha Univ, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Dept Pediat & Prevent Dent, Chennai 600077, India
来源
JOURNAL OF POPULATION THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY | 2023年 / 30卷 / 10期
关键词
Canal centering; transportation; Pediatric rotary files; Primary teeth; Novel;
D O I
10.47750/jptcp.2023.30.10.004
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: The primary goals of cleaning and shaping during pulpectomy procedure is to debride the canals simultaneously to maintain canal morphology and to prevent any transportation or perforations. These are critical iatrogenic faults that can lead to complications.Aim: To utilize cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging to evaluate how Pedoflex rotary files and Neoendo flex orifice enlarger affect the centering ability and transportation of the canal during a Biomechanical preparations.Materials and method: Forty primary mandibular first molar distal roots were scanned using cone -beam computed tomography (CBCT). The teeth were randomly separated into two equal groups and treated with either Pedoflex rotary files or Neoendo flex orifice enlarger files. After the canals were prepared, they were rescanned using CBCT, and the images were divided into cervical, middle, and apical thirds. The study evaluated and compared the transportation (CT) of the canals and the centering ability of the instruments between the two groups.Results: Both files maintain the canal centering ability better in the middle level than cervical and apical levels. However this was not statistically significant. No difference was observed between the two systems in terms of canal transportation.Conclusion: The study found that there was no significant variation in the canal transportation and centering ability between the two rotary file systems used. Therefore, both systems can be safely utilized with minimal risk of procedural errors during root canal preparation.
引用
收藏
页码:E19 / E23
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Ash MM, 2009, WHEELERS DENT ANATOM, V9th, P63
  • [2] Comparative evaluation of extrusion of apical debris in primary anterior teeth using two different rotary systems and hand files: An In Vitro study
    Asif, Ahsana
    Jeevanandan, Ganesh
    Govindaraju, Lavanya
    Vignesh, R.
    Subramanian, E. M. G.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2019, 10 (03) : 512 - 516
  • [3] Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography
    Gambill, JM
    Alder, M
    delRio, CE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1996, 22 (07) : 369 - 375
  • [4] Govindaraju Lavanya, 2021, Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, V14, pS179, DOI 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2108
  • [5] Haridoss Selvakumar, 2022, Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, V15, pS30, DOI 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2127
  • [6] Clinical comparison of Kedo-S paediatric rotary files vs manual instrumentation for root canal preparation in primary molars: a double blinded randomised clinical trial
    Jeevanandan G.
    Govindaraju L.
    [J]. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2018, 19 (4) : 273 - 278
  • [7] Juliet S., 2020, J Orofac Sci., V12, P30
  • [8] Kuo C.I., 2006, J. Dent. Sci, V1, P10
  • [9] Prabhakar Attiguppe R, 2016, Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, V9, P45, DOI 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1332
  • [10] Selvakumar Haridoss, 2014, J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, V32, P286, DOI 10.4103/0970-4388.140943