Comparative analysis of prebiotic effects of four oligosaccharides using in vitro gut model: digestibility, microbiome, and metabolome changes

被引:9
|
作者
Cheon, Seongwon [1 ]
Kim, Geonhee [1 ]
Bae, Jae-Han [1 ]
Lee, Dong Hyeon [1 ]
Seong, Hyunbin [1 ]
Kim, Da Hye [1 ]
Han, Jung-Sook [2 ]
Lim, Su-Youn [2 ]
Han, Nam Soo [1 ]
机构
[1] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Brain Korea Ctr Biohlth Ind 21, Dept Food Sci & Biotechnol, Cheongju 28644, South Korea
[2] Samyang Corp, Samyang Corp Food Biotech R&D Ctr, 295 Pangyo Ro, Seongnam Si 13488, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
关键词
fructooligosaccharide; maltooligosaccharide; metabolome; microbiome; prebiotic; resistant maltodextrin; BIFIDOBACTERIA; FERMENTATION; DIGESTION; INULIN; ABSORPTION; PROBIOTICS; FOOD;
D O I
10.1093/femsec/fiad002
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Fructooligosaccharides (FOS), Ad-fructooligosaccharides (Ad-FOS), resistant maltodextrin (RMD), and maltooligosaccharides (MOS) are commercially available prebiotic oligosaccharides. In this study, the effects of prebiotics on the human gut microbial ecosystem were evaluated using an in vitro gut model. FOS and Ad-FOS showed tolerance to digestion, whereas RMD and MOS showed moderate digestion by digestive enzymes. In in vitro fecal fermentation, Bifidobacterium spp. increased in the following order: FOS, Ad-FOS, MOS, and RMD, whereas Bacteroides spp. increased in RMD medium. Bacteroides xylanisolvens exhibited cross-feeding by enabling the growth of other beneficial bacteria during co-culture in RMD medium. In metabolome analysis, total short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were highly produced in the following order: RMD, FOS, MOS, and Ad-FOS; acetate in the order of FOS, MOS/RMD, and Ad-FOS; butyrate in the order of RMD, MOS, FOS, and Ad-FOS; and propionate only in RMD. In addition, the conversion of betaine to trimethylamine was rarely affected in the following order: MOS, RMD, FOS, and Ad-FOS. Lastly, the four oligosaccharides inhibited the adhesion of pathogenic Escherichia coli to human epithelial cells to a similar extent. The comparative analysis results obtained in this study will provide comprehensive information of these substances to manufacturers and customers. The oligosaccharides, FOS, Ad-FOS, RMD, and MOS, exhibited prebiotic effects, but their action patterns and efficacy vary owing to their different digestibility, fermentability, and cross-feeding interactions in complex microbiome ecosystems.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring Effects of Chitosan Oligosaccharides on Mice Gut Microbiota in in vitro Fermentation and Animal Model
    Zhang, Chen
    Jiao, Siming
    Wang, Zhuo A.
    Du, Yuguang
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [22] Role of Probiotics in Gut Microbiome and Metabolome in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Mouse Model: A Comparative Study
    Wu, Tian
    Zeng, Zheng
    Yu, Yanyan
    MICROORGANISMS, 2024, 12 (05)
  • [23] Anxiolytic effects of a galacto-oligosaccharides prebiotic in healthy females (18–25 years) with corresponding changes in gut bacterial composition
    Nicola Johnstone
    Chiara Milesi
    Olivia Burn
    Bartholomeus van den Bogert
    Arjen Nauta
    Kathryn Hart
    Paul Sowden
    Philip W. J. Burnet
    Kathrin Cohen Kadosh
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [24] Deploying an In Vitro Gut Model to Assay the Impact of the Mannan-Oligosaccharide Prebiotic Bio-Mos on the Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Gut Microbiome
    Kazlauskaite, Raminta
    Cheaib, Bachar
    Humble, Joseph
    Heys, Chloe
    Ijaz, Umer Zeeshan
    Connelly, Stephanie
    Sloan, William T.
    Russell, Julie
    Martinez-Rubio, Laura
    Sweetman, John
    Kitts, Alex
    McGinnity, Philip
    Lyons, Philip
    Llewellyn, Martin S.
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (03):
  • [25] Comparative analysis of prebiotic effects of seaweed polysaccharides laminaran, porphyran, and ulvan using in vitro human fecal fermentation
    Seong, Hyunbin
    Bae, Jae-Han
    Seo, Ji Sun
    Kim, Seul-Ah
    Kim, Tae-Jip
    Han, Nam Soo
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS, 2019, 57 : 408 - 416
  • [26] Comparative study on prebiotic effects of different types of prebiotics in an in vitro fermentation by gut microbiota of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)
    Zhou, Li
    Han, Fenglu
    Lu, Kunyu
    Qiao, Yanbing
    Li, Erchao
    AQUACULTURE, 2023, 574
  • [27] Metagenomic and Metabolomic Analysis of the Toxic Effects of Trichloroacetamide-Induced Gut Microbiome and Urine Metabolome Perturbations in Mice
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhao, Fuzheng
    Deng, Yongfeng
    Zhao, Yanping
    Ren, Hongqiang
    JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2015, 14 (04) : 1752 - 1761
  • [28] Anxiolytic effects of a galacto-oligosaccharides prebiotic in healthy females (18-25 years) with corresponding changes in gut bacterial composition
    Johnstone, Nicola
    Milesi, Chiara
    Burn, Olivia
    van den Bogert, Bartholomeus
    Nauta, Arjen
    Hart, Kathryn
    Sowden, Paul
    Burnet, Philip W. J.
    Kadosh, Kathrin Cohen
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [29] Effect of Plant-Based Mung Bean Products on Digestibility and Gut Microbiome Profiling Using In Vitro Fecal Fermentation
    Tampanna, Nattha
    Chansuwan, Worapanit
    Wichienchot, Santad
    PLANT FOODS FOR HUMAN NUTRITION, 2024, 79 (02) : 460 - 467
  • [30] Gut microbiome and plasma metabolome changes in rats after oral gavage of nanoparticles: sensitive indicators of possible adverse health effects
    Landsiedel, Robert
    Hahn, Daniela
    Ossig, Rainer
    Ritz, Sabrina
    Sauer, Lydia
    Buesen, Roland
    Rehm, Sascha
    Wohlleben, Wendel
    Groeters, Sibylle
    Strauss, Volker
    Sperber, Saskia
    Wami, Haleluya
    Dobrindt, Ulrich
    Prior, Karola
    Harmsen, Dag
    van Ravenzwaay, Bennard
    Schnekenburger, Juergen
    PARTICLE AND FIBRE TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 19 (01)