The Relationship between Non-Native Perception and Phonological Patterning of Implosive Consonants

被引:0
作者
Oakley, Madeleine [1 ,3 ]
Sande, Hannah [2 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept English, Tompkins Hall,2211 Hillsborough St, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Speech perception; implosives; phonology; phonetics; typology; ASSIMILATION; DISCRIMINATION; CONTRASTS; LANGUAGE; SPEECH;
D O I
10.1177/00238309221132495
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
This study uses non-native perception data to examine the relationship between perceived phonetic similarity of segments and their phonological patterning. Segments that are phonetically similar to one another are anticipated to pattern together phonologically, and segments that share articulatory or acoustic properties are also expected to be perceived as similar. What is not yet clear is whether segments that pattern together phonologically are perceived as similar. This study addresses this question by examining how L1 English listeners and L1 Guebie listeners perceive non-native implosive consonants compared with plosives and sonorants. English does not have contrastive implosives, whereas Guebie has a bilabial implosive. The bilabial implosive phonologically patterns with sonorants in Guebie, to the exclusion of obstruents. Two perception experiments show English listeners make more perceptual categorization errors between implosives and voiced plosives than Guebie listeners do, but both listener groups are more likely to classify implosives as similar to voiced plosives than sonorants. The results also show that Guebie listeners are better at categorizing non-native implosive consonants (i.e., alveolar implosives) than English listeners, showing that listeners are able to extend features or gestures from their L1 to non-native implosive consonants. The results of these experiments suggest a cross-linguistic perceptual similarity hierarchy of implosives compared with other segments that are not affected by L1 phonological patterning.
引用
收藏
页码:786 / 815
页数:30
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, THESIS OHIO STATE U
[2]  
Bennett W. G., 2013, Dissimilation, consonant harmony, and surface correspondence
[3]  
Best C T., 2007, Language Learning Language Teaching, V17, P13, DOI [10.1075/lllt.17.07bes, DOI 10.1075/LLLT.17.07BES]
[4]  
Best C.T., 1995, SPEECH PERCEPTION LI, P171
[5]   Articulating What Infants Attune to in Native Speech [J].
Best, Catherine T. ;
Goldstein, Louis M. ;
Nam, Hosung ;
Tyler, Michael D. .
ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 28 (04) :216-261
[6]   Infant perception of non-native consonant contrasts that adults assimilate in different ways [J].
Best, CC ;
McRoberts, GW .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2003, 46 :183-216
[7]   Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system [J].
Best, CT ;
McRoberts, GW ;
Goodell, E .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 109 (02) :775-794
[8]   Native-language phonetic and phonological influences on perception of American English approximants by Danish and German listeners [J].
Bohn, Ocke-Schwen ;
Best, Catherine T. .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 2012, 40 (01) :109-128
[9]   ARTICULATORY PHONOLOGY - AN OVERVIEW [J].
BROWMAN, CP ;
GOLDSTEIN, L .
PHONETICA, 1992, 49 (3-4) :155-180
[10]  
Chomsky Noam., 1968, SOUND PATTERN ENGLIS