Carbon Emission Reduction Evaluation of End-of-Life Buildings Based on Multiple Recycling Strategies

被引:5
作者
Lei, Bin [1 ]
Yang, Wanying [1 ]
Yan, Yusong [1 ]
Tang, Zhuo [2 ]
Dong, Wenkui [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Univ, Sch Civil Engn & Architecture, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Changsha 410004, Peoples R China
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Construct Mat, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
end-of-life; deconstruction; life cycle assessment (LCA); embodied carbon; recycling; remanufacturing; reuse; CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS; DEMOLITION WASTE; ENERGY NEED; DECONSTRUCTION; MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/su152215711
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the promotion of sustainability in the buildings and construction sector, the carbon saving strategies for the end-of-life (EoL) phase have been receiving increasing attention. In this research, life cycle assessment (LCA) theory was employed to study and compare the carbon savings benefits of three different management strategies (i.e., recycling, remanufacturing, and reuse) on the EoL phase of various buildings (including residential, office, commercial, and school buildings). Moreover, the carbon savings potential (CSP) was calculated and analyzed, which is defined as the percentage of the actual carbon savings to the sum of the total embodied carbon of the building. Results show that compared with traditional demolition and landfill treatment, the implementation of integrated management strategies for residential, office, commercial, and school buildings can reduce carbon emissions by 193.5-526.4 kgCO2-e/m2. Among the building materials, steel bar, structural steel, and concrete account for the major proportion of the total carbon savings of buildings (81.5-93.2%). The sequence of the CSPs for the four types of buildings, in descending order, is school, residential, commercial, and office buildings. A building with a life span of 50 years has the greatest CSP. The results of the study can be used to reduce environmental impacts, and have broad positive implications in terms of sustainable construction.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Optimising material procurement for construction waste minimization: An exploration of success factors [J].
Ajayi, Saheed O. ;
Oyedele, Lukumon O. ;
Akinade, Olugbenga O. ;
Bilal, Muhammad ;
Alaka, Hafiz A. ;
Owolabi, Hakeem A. .
SUSTAINABLE MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGIES, 2017, 11 :38-46
[2]   Deep learning model for Demolition Waste Prediction in a circular economy [J].
Akanbi, Lukman A. ;
Oyedele, Ahmed O. ;
Oyedele, Lukumon O. ;
Salami, Rafiu O. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 274
[3]   Design for Deconstruction (DfD): Critical success factors for diverting end-of-life waste from landfills [J].
Akinade, Olugbenga O. ;
Oyedele, Lukumon O. ;
Ajayi, Saheed O. ;
Bilal, Muhammad ;
Alaka, Hafiz A. ;
Owolabi, Hakeem A. ;
Bello, Sururah A. ;
Jaiyeoba, Babatunde E. ;
Kadiri, Kabir O. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 60 :3-13
[4]  
[Anonymous], Budget Data, Shenzhen Sware Platform
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Uniform Standards for Civil Building Design
[6]   Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules [J].
Aye, Lu ;
Ngo, T. ;
Crawford, R. H. ;
Gammampila, R. ;
Mendis, P. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 47 :159-168
[7]   A web-based Decision Support System for the optimal management of construction and demolition waste [J].
Banias, G. ;
Achillas, Ch. ;
Vlachokostas, Ch. ;
Moussiopoulos, N. ;
Papaioannou, I. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (12) :2497-2502
[8]  
Bergman R.D., 2012, Life Cycle Primary Energy and Carbon Analysis of Recovering Softwood Framing Lumber and Hardwood Flooring for Reuse
[9]   Analysis and future outlook of natural gas consumption in the Italian residential sector [J].
Bianco, Vincenzo ;
Scarpa, Federico ;
Tagliafico, Luca A. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 87 :754-764
[10]   The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings [J].
Blengini, Gian Andrea ;
Di Carlo, Tiziana .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2010, 42 (06) :869-880