Optimal insurance design under belief-dependent utility and ambiguity

被引:0
作者
Fan, Yulian [1 ]
机构
[1] North China Univ Technol, Dept Math, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Optimal insurance design; Belief-dependent utility (BDU); Ambiguity; Indemnity; Premium; D81; G22; EXPECTED UTILITY; PROBABILITY; MODEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s11579-023-00349-5
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We introduce a smooth decision model under ambiguity by the belief-dependent utility (BDU) proposed in Fan (Acta Math Appl Sin 37(4):682-696, 2021). Using the smooth decision model under BDU, we get the explicit optimal insurance policy for the insurer. Then the optimal insurance policy for the insured under premium constraint (the insurer is assumed to be risk neutral) is studied. The explicit results can explain some notable behaviors in insurance demand which are inconsistent with the classical insurance contracting literature. For example, if the insured is very sensitive to small losses and the insurer is not so sensitive to small losses (or the insurer is risk neutral), the insured will prefer to purchase warranties for small losses rather than buy protections against devastating losses, which is consistent with some insurance demand behaviors observed on the insurance market. If the insured is less sensitive to small losses than the insurer, insurance policy against large losses above a deductible will be popular. At last, this paper provides an example.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 748
页数:28
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ARROW KJ, 1963, AM ECON REV, V53, P941
[2]   OPTIMAL INSURANCE DESIGN UNDER RANK-DEPENDENT EXPECTED UTILITY [J].
Bernard, Carole ;
He, Xuedong ;
Yan, Jia-An ;
Zhou, Xun Yu .
MATHEMATICAL FINANCE, 2015, 25 (01) :154-186
[3]  
Billingsley Patrick, 1999, Convergence of Probability Measures, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470316962
[4]   Rearrangement inequalities in non-convex insurance models [J].
Carlier, G ;
Dana, RA .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 41 (4-5) :483-503
[5]   Optimal risk-sharing rules and equilibria with Choquet-expected-utility [J].
Chateauneuf, A ;
Dana, RA ;
Tallon, JM .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 34 (02) :191-214
[6]   OPTIMAL INCENTIVE-COMPATIBLE INSURANCE WITH BACKGROUND RISK [J].
Chi, Yichun ;
Tan, Ken Seng .
ASTIN BULLETIN, 2021, 51 (02) :661-688
[7]   RISK, AMBIGUITY, AND THE SAVAGE AXIOMS [J].
ELLSBERG, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1961, 75 (04) :643-669
[8]   A Belief-Dependent Utility Model [J].
Fan, Yu-lian .
ACTA MATHEMATICAE APPLICATAE SINICA-ENGLISH SERIES, 2021, 37 (04) :682-696
[9]   Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude [J].
Ghirardato, P ;
Maccheroni, F ;
Marinacci, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2004, 118 (02) :133-173
[10]  
Ghossoub M., 2021, OPTIMAL INSURANCE PR