Boosting methane production and raw waste activated sludge treatment in a microbial electrolysis cell-anaerobic digestion (MEC-AD) system: The effect of organic loading rate

被引:20
作者
Kanellos, Gerasimos [1 ]
Tremouli, Asimina [1 ]
Arvanitakis, Georgios [1 ]
Lyberatos, Gerasimos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Chem Engn, Iroon Polytech 9, Athens 15780, Greece
[2] Inst Chem Engn Sci ICE HT, Stadiou Str, Patras 26504, Greece
关键词
Bio-electrochemical systems; Microbial electrolysis cell-assisted anaerobic; digestion; Waste activated sludge; Methanogenesis; Organic loading rate; Applied potential; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; FERMENTATION; PERFORMANCE; COMMUNITIES; VOLTAGE; CARBON; CH4; CO2;
D O I
10.1016/j.bioelechem.2023.108555
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study deals with the effect of different organic loading rates (OLRs) on the organic load removal and the productivity of methane, in a microbial electrolysis cell-anaerobic digestion (MEC-AD) system treating raw waste activated sludge (WAS). For comparison, two identical reactors, a control (AD) and a MEC-AD reactor were constructed. Both reactors operated for 131 days, during which different Organic Loading Rates (OLRs) were examined; 1.1, 1.7 and 2.9 gCOD/(L*d). The results showed that the MEC-AD reactor performed better, relative to the AD reactor, at high OLRs. Specifically, the additional total particulate carbon and Kjeldahl nitrogen removal reached 12% and 13%, respectively, at an OLR of 1.7 gCOD/(L*d), while they reached 19% and 13%, respectively, at an OLR of 2.9 gCOD/(L*d). Moreover, the biogas production and the methane content increased by 30% and 6%, respectively, at an OLR of 1.7 gCOD/(L*d) and by 32% and 5%, respectively, at an OLR of 2.9 gCOD/(L*d). The electrochemical measurements indicated that the power output increased from 5 to 30 mW/m2 when the OLR increased from 1.1 to 2.9 gCOD/(L*d). Overall, the results showed that the MEC-AD accelerated and enhanced the WAS treatment, boosting methane productivity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
APHA/AWWA/WEF, 2012, Methods., V541
[2]   Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge [J].
Appels, Lise ;
Baeyens, Jan ;
Degreve, Jan ;
Dewil, Raf .
PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2008, 34 (06) :755-781
[3]   Improving methane productivity of waste activated sludge by ultrasound and alkali pretreatment in microbial electrolysis cell and anaerobic digestion coupled system [J].
Bao, Hongxu ;
Yang, Hua ;
Zhang, Hao ;
Liu, Yichen ;
Su, Hongzhi ;
Shen, Manli .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 180
[4]   Reduced graphene oxide improves the performance of a methanogenic biocathode [J].
Carrillo-Pena, D. ;
Mateos, R. ;
Moran, A. ;
Escapa, A. .
FUEL, 2022, 321
[5]   Microbial electrolysis cell simultaneously enhancing methanization and reducing hydrogen sulfide production in anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge [J].
Chen X. ;
Xiao B. ;
Tang X. ;
Bian C. ;
Liu J. ;
Li L. .
Chemosphere, 2023, 337
[6]   Biostimulation by direct voltage to enhance anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge [J].
Chen, Ying ;
Yu, Bao ;
Yin, Changkai ;
Zhang, Chen ;
Dai, Xiaohu ;
Yuan, Haiping ;
Zhu, Nanwen .
RSC ADVANCES, 2016, 6 (02) :1581-1588
[7]   Bioelectrochemical methane (CH4) production in anaerobic digestion at different supplemental voltages [J].
Choi, Kwang-Soon ;
Kondaveeti, Sanath ;
Min, Booki .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 245 :826-832
[8]  
De Mes T.Z.D., 2003, Methane production by anaerobic digestion of wastewater and solid wastes, P58, DOI [10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08, DOI 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2010.08, DOI 10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2010.08.032]
[9]   Sewage Sludge Quality and Management for Circular Economy Opportunities in Lombardy [J].
Domini, Marta ;
Bertanza, Giorgio ;
Vahidzadeh, Reza ;
Pedrazzani, Roberta .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (20)
[10]   Influence of applied voltage on the performance of bioelectrochemical anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and planktonic microbial communities at ambient temperature [J].
Feng, Qing ;
Song, Young-Chae ;
Bae, Byung-Uk .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 220 :500-508