The Co-Twin Control Design: Implementation and Methodological Considerations

被引:10
作者
Gonggrijp, Bodine M. A. [1 ,2 ]
van de Weijer, Steve G. A. [1 ]
Bijleveld, Catrien C. J. H. [1 ,3 ]
van Dongen, Jenny [2 ,4 ]
Boomsma, Dorret I. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst Study Crime & Law Enforcement NSC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Biol Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Criminal Law & Criminol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Discordant twin design; causal inference; genetic confounding; twin research; LIFE EVENTS; TWIN; BIRTH; DEPRESSION; CAUSATION; DIRECTION; WEIGHT; SAMPLE; COHORT;
D O I
10.1017/thg.2023.35
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Establishing causal relationships in observational studies is an important step in research and policy decision making. The association between an exposure and an outcome can be confounded by multiple factors, often making it hard to draw causal conclusions. The co-twin control design (CTCD) is a powerful approach that allows for the investigation of causal effects while controlling for genetic and shared environmental confounding factors. This article introduces the CTCD and offers an overview of analysis methods for binary and continuous outcome and exposure variables. Tools for data simulation are provided, along with practical guidance and accompanying scripts for implementing the CTCD in R, SPSS, and Stata. While the CTCD offers valuable insights into causal inference, it depends on several assumptions that are important when interpreting CTCD results. By presenting a broad overview of the CTCD, this article aims to equip researchers with actionable recommendations and a comprehensive understanding of the design's strengths and limitations.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Adedokun O., 2012, J MULTIDISCIPLINARY, V8, P125, DOI [10.56645/jmde.v8i17.336, DOI 10.56645/JMDE.V8I17.336]
  • [2] ASHENFELTER O, 1994, AM ECON REV, V84, P1157
  • [3] The Biosocial Underpinnings to Adolescent Victimization Results From a Longitudinal Sample of Twins
    Beaver, Kevin M.
    Boutwell, Brian B.
    Barnes, J. C.
    Cooper, Jonathon A.
    [J]. YOUTH VIOLENCE AND JUVENILE JUSTICE, 2009, 7 (03) : 223 - 238
  • [4] EFFICIENCY OF HUMAN MONOZYGOTIC TWINS IN STUDIES OF BLOOD LIPIDS
    CHRISTIAN, JC
    KANG, KW
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1972, 21 (08): : 691 - +
  • [5] Sex differences in birth defects: A study of opposite-sex twins
    Cui, W
    Ma, CX
    Tang, YW
    Chang, V
    Rao, PV
    Ariet, M
    Resnick, MB
    Roth, J
    [J]. BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART A-CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR TERATOLOGY, 2005, 73 (11) : 876 - 880
  • [6] Critical Need for Family-Based, Quasi-Experimental Designs in Integrating Genetic and Social Science Research
    D'Onofrio, Brian M.
    Lahey, Benjamin B.
    Turkheimer, Eric
    Lichtenstein, Paul
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 103 : 46 - 55
  • [7] De Jong R., 2022, Long-term consequences of child sexual abuse: Adult role fulfillment of child sexual abuse victims
  • [8] Genome-wide Methylomic Analysis of Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Adolescent Depression
    Dempster, Emma L.
    Wong, Chloe C. Y.
    Lester, Kathryn J.
    Burrage, Joe
    Gregory, Alice M.
    Mill, Jonathan
    Eley, Thalia C.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 76 (12) : 977 - 983
  • [9] INFERRING THE DIRECTION OF CAUSATION IN CROSS-SECTIONAL TWIN DATA - THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL CONSIDERATIONS
    DUFFY, DL
    MARTIN, NG
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 11 (06) : 483 - 502
  • [10] Sibling Comparison Designs Bias From Non-Shared Confounders and Measurement Error
    Frisell, Thomas
    Oeberg, Sara
    Kuja-Halkola, Ralf
    Sjolander, Arvid
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (05) : 713 - 720