Agricultural products from algal biomass grown in piggery wastewater: A techno-economic analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Rojo, Elena M. [1 ,2 ]
Molinos-Senante, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Filipigh, A. Alejandro [1 ,2 ]
Lafarga, Tomas [3 ]
Fernandez, F. Gabriel Acien [3 ]
Bolado, Silvia [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Inst Sustainable Proc, Dr Mergelina S-N, Valladolid 47011, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, Sch Ind Engn, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Technol, Dr Mergelina S-N, Valladolid 47011, Spain
[3] Univ Almeria, Dept Chem Engn, Carr Sacramento S-N, Almeria 04120, Spain
[4] Univ Valladolid, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Technol, Calle Dr Mergelina S-N, Valladolid 47011, Spain
关键词
Biostimulant; Biopesticide; Microalgal biomass; Swine manure; Techno-economic assessment; MICROALGAE; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164159
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The intensification of livestock activities lead to an increase in waste generation with high content of nutrients, as is the case of piggery wastewater. However, this type of residue can be used as culture media for algae cultivation in thin -layer cascade photobioreactors to reduce its environment impact and produce a valorizable algal biomass. Biostimulants were produced by enzymatic hydrolysis and ultrasonication of microalgal biomass, using membranes (Scenario 1) or centrifugation (Scenario 2) as harvesting methods. The co-production of biopesticides by solvent ex-traction was also evaluated using membranes (Scenario 3) or centrifugation (Scenario 4). The four scenarios were an-alyzed by a technoeconomic assessment estimating the total annualized equivalent cost and the production cost, i.e., the minimum selling price. Centrifugation provided biostimulants approximately 4 times more concentrated than membranes, but with higher expense due to the cost of the centrifuge (contribution of 62.2 % in scenario 2) and the electricity requirements. The biopesticide production resulted the highest contribution to investment cost in scenarios 3 and 4 (34 % and 43 % respectively). The use of membranes was also more advantageous to produce bio-pesticides, although it was 5 times more diluted than using centrifuge. The biostimulant production cost was 65.5 E/ m3 with membranes and 342.6 E/m3 by centrifugation and the biopesticide production cost was 353.7 E/m3 in sce-nario 3 and 2,122.1 E/m3 in scenario 4. Comparing the treatment of 1 ha of land, the cost of the biostimulant produced in the four scenarios was lower than the commercial one (48.1 %, 22.1 %, 45.1 % and 24.2 % respectively). Finally, using membranes for biomass harvesting allowed economically viable plants with lower capacity and longer distance for biostimulant distribution (up to 300 km) than centrifuge (188 km). The algal biomass valorization for agricultural products production is an environmentally and economically feasible process with the adequate capacity of the plant and distribution distance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Techno-economic uncertainty quantification of algal-derived biocrude via hydrothermal liquefaction
    Jiang, Yuan
    Jones, Susanne B.
    Zhu, Yunhua
    Snowden-Swan, Lesley
    Schmidt, Andrew J.
    Billing, Justin M.
    Anderson, Daniel
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2019, 39
  • [22] TECHNO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT OF BIOHYDROGEN PRODUCTION FROM FOREST BIOMASS IN WESTERN CANADA
    Sarkar, S.
    Kumar, A.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2009, 52 (02) : 519 - 530
  • [23] Techno-economic analysis of algal fuel from native polyculture microalgae based on utilization of palm oil mill effluent and excess energy
    Rani, Devitra Saka
    Sismartono, Danang
    Supriyanto
    Watanabe, Makoto M.
    Demura, Mikihide
    Ahamed, Tofael
    Noguchi, Ryozo
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 21
  • [24] Biogas from mono- and co-digestion of microalgal biomass grown on piggery wastewater
    Carminati, P.
    Gusmini, D.
    Pizzera, A.
    Catenacci, A.
    Parati, K.
    Ficara, E.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 78 (01) : 103 - 113
  • [25] Techno-economic analysis of microalgae production for aquafeed in Norway
    Vazquez-Romero, Barbara
    Antonio Perales, Jose
    de Vree, Jeroen H.
    Bopple, Hanna
    Steinrucken, Pia
    Barbosa, Maria J.
    Kleinegris, Dorinde M. M.
    Ruiz, Jesus
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2022, 64
  • [26] Techno-economic assessment of bioleaching for metallurgical by-products
    Kara, Ipek Tezyapar
    Wagland, Stuart T.
    Coulon, Frederic
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 358
  • [27] Techno-economic assessment of a novel algal-membrane system versus conventional wastewater treatment and advanced potable reuse processes: Part II
    Lugo, Abdiel
    Xu, Xuesong
    Abeysiriwardana-Arachchige, I. S. A.
    Bandara, G. L. Chathurika L.
    Nirmalakhandan, Nagamany
    Xu, Pei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 331
  • [28] From biomass-derived fructose to γ-valerolactone: Process design and techno-economic assessment
    di Bucchianico, Daniele di Menno
    Scarponi, Giordano Emrys
    Buvat, Jean-Christophe
    Leveneur, Sebastien
    Moreno, Valeria Casson
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 401
  • [29] Complementarity of Substrates in Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Grown Algal Biomass
    Assemany, Paula
    de Paula Marques, Isabel
    Calijuri, Maria Lucia
    Reis, Alberto
    WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2020, 11 (11) : 5759 - 5770
  • [30] Complementarity of Substrates in Anaerobic Digestion of Wastewater Grown Algal Biomass
    Paula Assemany
    Isabel de Paula Marques
    Maria Lúcia Calijuri
    Alberto Reis
    Waste and Biomass Valorization, 2020, 11 : 5759 - 5770