Agricultural products from algal biomass grown in piggery wastewater: A techno-economic analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Rojo, Elena M. [1 ,2 ]
Molinos-Senante, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Filipigh, A. Alejandro [1 ,2 ]
Lafarga, Tomas [3 ]
Fernandez, F. Gabriel Acien [3 ]
Bolado, Silvia [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Inst Sustainable Proc, Dr Mergelina S-N, Valladolid 47011, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, Sch Ind Engn, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Technol, Dr Mergelina S-N, Valladolid 47011, Spain
[3] Univ Almeria, Dept Chem Engn, Carr Sacramento S-N, Almeria 04120, Spain
[4] Univ Valladolid, Dept Chem Engn & Environm Technol, Calle Dr Mergelina S-N, Valladolid 47011, Spain
关键词
Biostimulant; Biopesticide; Microalgal biomass; Swine manure; Techno-economic assessment; MICROALGAE; PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164159
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The intensification of livestock activities lead to an increase in waste generation with high content of nutrients, as is the case of piggery wastewater. However, this type of residue can be used as culture media for algae cultivation in thin -layer cascade photobioreactors to reduce its environment impact and produce a valorizable algal biomass. Biostimulants were produced by enzymatic hydrolysis and ultrasonication of microalgal biomass, using membranes (Scenario 1) or centrifugation (Scenario 2) as harvesting methods. The co-production of biopesticides by solvent ex-traction was also evaluated using membranes (Scenario 3) or centrifugation (Scenario 4). The four scenarios were an-alyzed by a technoeconomic assessment estimating the total annualized equivalent cost and the production cost, i.e., the minimum selling price. Centrifugation provided biostimulants approximately 4 times more concentrated than membranes, but with higher expense due to the cost of the centrifuge (contribution of 62.2 % in scenario 2) and the electricity requirements. The biopesticide production resulted the highest contribution to investment cost in scenarios 3 and 4 (34 % and 43 % respectively). The use of membranes was also more advantageous to produce bio-pesticides, although it was 5 times more diluted than using centrifuge. The biostimulant production cost was 65.5 E/ m3 with membranes and 342.6 E/m3 by centrifugation and the biopesticide production cost was 353.7 E/m3 in sce-nario 3 and 2,122.1 E/m3 in scenario 4. Comparing the treatment of 1 ha of land, the cost of the biostimulant produced in the four scenarios was lower than the commercial one (48.1 %, 22.1 %, 45.1 % and 24.2 % respectively). Finally, using membranes for biomass harvesting allowed economically viable plants with lower capacity and longer distance for biostimulant distribution (up to 300 km) than centrifuge (188 km). The algal biomass valorization for agricultural products production is an environmentally and economically feasible process with the adequate capacity of the plant and distribution distance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Techno-economic and environmental sustainability prospects on biochemical conversion of agricultural and algal biomass to biofuels
    Saravanan, A.
    Yaashikaa, P. R.
    Kumar, P. Senthil
    Vickram, A. S.
    Karishma, S.
    Kamalesh, R.
    Rangasamy, Gayathri
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 414
  • [2] Techno-economic analysis of ash removal in biomass harvested from algal turf scrubbers
    Hess, Derek
    Wendt, Lynn M.
    Wahlen, Bradley D.
    Aston, John E.
    Hu, Hongqiang
    Quinn, Jason C.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2019, 123 : 149 - 158
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of biostimulant production from algal biomass grown on piggery wastewater
    Rojo, Elena M.
    Rossi, Simone
    Bolado, Silvia
    Stampino, Paola Gallo
    Ficara, Elena
    Dotelli, Giovanni
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 907
  • [4] Valorization of algal cells for biomass and bioenergy production from wastewater: Sustainable strategies, challenges, and techno-economic limitations
    Tawfik, Ahmed
    Niaz, Haider
    Qadeer, Kinza
    Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul
    Liu, J. Jay
    Lee, Moonyong
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 157
  • [5] Techno-economic evaluation of biohydrogen production from wastewater and agricultural waste
    Li, Ya-Chieh
    Liu, Yung-Feng
    Chu, Chen-Yeon
    Chang, Pao-Long
    Hsu, Chiung-Wen
    Lin, Ping-Jei
    Wu, Shu-Yii
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (20) : 15704 - 15710
  • [6] A review on biodiesel production by algal biomass: Outlook on lifecycle assessment and techno-economic analysis
    Yaashikaa, P. R.
    Devi, M. Keerthana
    Kumar, P. Senthil
    Pandian, E.
    FUEL, 2022, 324
  • [7] Techno-economic analysis of ethanol production from marine biomass
    Fasahati, Peyman
    Yi, Geongbum
    Liu, Jay
    11TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, PTS A AND B, 2012, 31 : 780 - 784
  • [8] Comprehensive techno-economic analysis of wastewater-based algal biofuel production: A case study
    Xin, Chunhua
    Addy, Min M.
    Zhao, Jinyu
    Cheng, Yanling
    Cheng, Sibo
    Mu, Dongyan
    Liu, Yuhuan
    Ding, Rijia
    Chen, Paul
    Ruan, Roger
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 211 : 584 - 593
  • [9] Converting wastewater cellulose to valuable products: A techno-economic assessment
    Khan, Mohammed Nazeer
    Lacroix, Mark
    Wessels, Coos
    Van Dael, Miet
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 365
  • [10] Techno-Economic Analysis of the Production of Lactic Acid from Lignocellulosic Biomass
    Manandhar, Ashish
    Shah, Ajay
    FERMENTATION-BASEL, 2023, 9 (07):