Convolutional neural network-based automated maxillary alveolar bone segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography images

被引:30
作者
Fontenele, Rocharles Cavalcante [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gerhardt, Mauricio do Nascimento [1 ,4 ]
Picoli, Fernando Fortes [1 ,5 ]
Van Gerven, Adriaan [6 ]
Nomidis, Stefanos [6 ]
Willems, Holger [6 ]
Freitas, Deborah Queiroz [3 ]
Jacobs, Reinhilde [1 ,2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven, Fac Med, Dept Imaging & Pathol, OMFS IMPATH Res Grp, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Dept Oral Diag, Div Oral Radiol, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil
[4] Pontif Catholic Univ Rio Grande Do Sul, Fac Dent, Sch Hlth Sci, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Goias, Sch Dent, Dept Dent, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[6] Relu BV, Leuven, Belgium
[7] Karolinska Inst, Dept Dent Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[8] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Kapucijnenvoer 7, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
alveolar crest; artificial intelligence; cone-beam computed tomography; dental implant; jaw bone; maxilla; neural networks; IMPLANT PLACEMENT; ACCURACY; CBCT;
D O I
10.1111/clr.14063
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo develop and assess the performance of a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-driven convolutional neural network (CNN)-based tool for automated three-dimensional (3D) maxillary alveolar bone segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and MethodsA total of 141 CBCT scans were collected for performing training (n = 99), validation (n = 12), and testing (n = 30) of the CNN model for automated segmentation of the maxillary alveolar bone and its crestal contour. Following automated segmentation, the 3D models with under- or overestimated segmentations were refined by an expert for generating a refined-AI (R-AI) segmentation. The overall performance of CNN model was assessed. Also, 30% of the testing sample was randomly selected and manually segmented to compare the accuracy of AI and manual segmentation. Additionally, the time required to generate a 3D model was recorded in seconds (s). ResultsThe accuracy metrics of automated segmentation showed an excellent range of values for all accuracy metrics. However, the manual method (95% HD: 0.20 +/- 0.05 mm; IoU: 95% +/- 3.0; DSC: 97% +/- 2.0) showed slightly better performance than the AI segmentation (95% HD: 0.27 +/- 0.03 mm; IoU: 92% +/- 1.0; DSC: 96% +/- 1.0). There was a statistically significant difference of the time-consumed among the segmentation methods (p < .001). The AI-driven segmentation (51.5 +/- 10.9 s) was 116 times faster than the manual segmentation (5973.3 +/- 623.6 s). The R-AI method showed intermediate time-consumed (1666.7 +/- 588.5 s). ConclusionAlthough the manual segmentation showed slightly better performance, the novel CNN-based tool also provided a highly accurate segmentation of the maxillary alveolar bone and its crestal contour consuming 116 times less than the manual approach.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 574
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Abdulkadir A., 2016, INT C MED IM COMP CO, P424, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49]
  • [2] Duration, deviation and operator's perception of static computer assisted implant placements by inexperienced clinicians
    Abduo, Jaafar
    Lau, Douglas
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2022, 26 (03) : 477 - 487
  • [3] Al Shayeb Kwthar Nassar A, 2014, Prim Dent J, V3, P25
  • [4] Workflow for highly porous resorbable custom 3D printed scaffolds using medical grade polymer for large volume alveolar bone regeneration
    Bartnikowski, Michal
    Vaquette, Cedryck
    Ivanovski, Saso
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (05) : 431 - 441
  • [5] Pose-aware instance segmentation framework from cone beam CT images for tooth segmentation
    Chung, Minyoung
    Lee, Minkyung
    Hong, Jioh
    Park, Sanguk
    Lee, Jusang
    Lee, Jingyu
    Yang, Il-Hyung
    Lee, Jeongjin
    Shin, Yeong-Gil
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2020, 120 (120)
  • [6] Fully automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial CT scans for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning using the nnU-Net framework
    Dot, Gauthier
    Schouman, Thomas
    Dubois, Guillaume
    Rouch, Philippe
    Gajny, Laurent
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (06) : 3639 - 3648
  • [7] Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets
    Ferrus, Jorge
    Cecchinato, Denis
    Pjetursson, E. Bjarni
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    Sanz, Mariano
    Lindhe, Jan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [8] Influence of dental fillings and tooth type on the performance of a novel artificial intelligence-driven tool for automatic tooth segmentation on CBCT images-A validation study
    Fontenele, Rocharles Cavalcante
    Gerhardt, Mauricio do Nascimento
    Pinto, Jader Camilo
    van Gerven, Adriaan
    Willems, Holger
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    Freitas, Deborah Queiroz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 119
  • [9] Time and costs related to computer-assisted versus non-computer-assisted implant planning and surgery. A systematic review
    Graf, Tobias
    Keul, Christine
    Wismeijer, Daniel
    Gueth, Jan Frederik
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 : 303 - 317
  • [10] Ham S., 2018, 1 C MED IM DEEP LEAR