A Comparison of Two Media Formulations and Two Vented Culture Vessels for Shoot Multiplication and Rooting of Hemp Shoot Tip Cultures

被引:6
作者
Borbas, Lillian N. [1 ]
Kurtz, Lauren E. [1 ]
Lubell-Brand, Jessica D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Plant Sci & Landscape Architecture, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
Cannabis sativa; tissue culture; Murashige and Skoog medium; MICROPROPAGATION;
D O I
10.21273/HORTTECH05179-22
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Micropropagation of hemp (Cannabis sativa) is constrained by problems with hyperhydricity and culture decline of microshoots. These problems can be reduced by increasing agar and nutrients in the media during micropropagation stages 1 and 2, respectfully. Performance of microshoots of 'Abacus' and 'Wife' hemp cultured in Driver and Kuniyuki Walnut medium (DKW) for 15 weeks (6 weeks of stage 1 + 9 weeks of stage 2), with subculturing every 3 weeks during both stages 1 and 2, or in Murashige and Skoog with vitamins medium (MS) for 6 weeks (stage 1) followed by Lubell-Brand Cannabis medium (LBC) for 9 weeks (stage 2), with subculturing every 3 weeks during both stages 1 and 2, was evaluated. In a separate study, microshoot performance of 'Abacus' and 'Wife' in MS for 3 weeks (stage 1) followed by LBC for 6 weeks (stage 2), with subculturing every 3 weeks, using boxes (Magenta GA-7) with lids featuring a vent with a diameter of 10 mm and a pore size of 0.2 mM or using microboxes (Sac O2 O95/114 + OD95) with lids featuring a filter (Sac O2 #10) were evaluated. Shoot multiplication rate (SMR) and explant height were greater for 'Abacus' in LBC than DKW. For 'Wife', SMR at 9 weeks was greater in LBC, as LBC provided more nutrients and water than cultures had received in MS initially during stage 1. Culture medium did not influence ex vitro rooting success, which was 75% for 'Abacus' and $ 90% for 'Wife'. Microboxes resulted in greater hyperhydricity of shoots and a lower ex vitro rooting percentage than boxes. For cultivars that are highly prone to developing hyperhydricity, like 'Abacus', the microboxes were not adequate to control this condition.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 238
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Bidlack J.E., 2021, Sterns introductory plant biology, VFifteenth
[2]  
DRIVER JA, 1984, HORTSCIENCE, V19, P507
[3]  
Hartmann H.T., 2002, HARTMANN KESTERS PLA, V7th
[4]   Ex Vitro Rooting of Cannabis sativa Microcuttings and Their Performance Compared to Retip and Stem Cuttings [J].
Kurtz, Lauren E. ;
Borbas, Lillian N. ;
Brand, Mark H. ;
Lubell-Brand, Jessica D. .
HORTSCIENCE, 2022, 57 (12) :1576-1579
[5]   Comparing Genotypic and Phenotypic Variation of Selfed and Outcrossed Progeny of Hemp [J].
Kurtz, Lauren E. ;
Mahoney, Jonathan D. ;
Brand, Mark H. ;
Lubell-Brand, Jessica D. .
HORTSCIENCE, 2020, 55 (08) :1206-1209
[6]   An In Vitro-Ex Vitro Micropropagation System for Hemp [J].
Lubell-Brand, Jessica D. ;
Kurtz, Lauren E. ;
Brand, Mark H. .
HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) :199-207
[7]   Flower power: floral reversion as a viable alternative to nodal micropropagation in Cannabis sativa. [J].
Monthony, A. S. ;
Bagheri, S. ;
Zheng, Y. ;
Jones, A. M. P. .
IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2021, 57 (06) :1018-1030
[8]   Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to de novo regeneration; a multi-genotype replication study [J].
Monthony, Adrian S. ;
Kyne, Sean T. ;
Grainger, Christopher M. ;
Jones, Andrew Maxwell P. .
PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08)
[9]   The Past, Present and Future of Cannabis sativa Tissue Culture [J].
Monthony, Adrian S. ;
Page, Serena R. ;
Hesami, Mohsen ;
Jones, Andrew Maxwell P. .
PLANTS-BASEL, 2021, 10 (01) :1-29
[10]   A REVISED MEDIUM FOR RAPID GROWTH AND BIO ASSAYS WITH TOBACCO TISSUE CULTURES [J].
MURASHIGE, T ;
SKOOG, F .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1962, 15 (03) :473-497