A novel prospect-theory-based three-way decision methodology in multi-scale information systems

被引:28
作者
Deng, Jiang [1 ]
Zhan, Jianming [1 ]
Ding, Weiping [2 ]
Liu, Peide [3 ]
Pedrycz, Witold [4 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Minzu Univ, Sch Math & Stat, Enshi 445000, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Nantong Univ, Sch Informat Sci & Technol, Nantong 226019, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ Finance & Econom, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Shandong 250014, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Alberta, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Three-way decision; Prospect theory; Multi-scale information system; Multi-attribute decision-making; OPTIMAL SCALE SELECTION; ROUGH SETS; MODEL; UNCERTAINTY; REDUCTION; CONSENSUS;
D O I
10.1007/s10462-022-10339-6
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In an uncertain and complex decision-making environment, limited by the scope of human cognition, traditional utility decision-making has a certain deviation to actual decision-making. The revision of behavioral decision-making (BDM) to traditional rational decision-making theory makes the new model more universal. In light of this point, we reveal a new three-way decision (3WD) model by virtue of prospect theory (PT) on multi-scale information systems (MS-ISs) for persuing multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problems. By utilizing an expected evaluation, our newly designed value function can not only reflect the relative position of the object but also avoid the drawbacks of the reference point being too subjective. Through the value function, we obtain a more reasonable avail function to replace the loss function in the traditional 3WD model. At the same time, the weighting function of the object in different states can be calculated, by synthesizing avail function and the weighting function under different decision attitudes. The comprehensive prospect value and classification conditions of the object are calculated. Then, through data selected from the UCI database, we verify the effectiveness of the constructed method. Comparative and experimental analyses are also used to illustrate the superiority and stability of our designed method.
引用
收藏
页码:6591 / 6625
页数:35
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Multi-granular soft rough covering sets [J].
Alcantud, Jose Carlos R. ;
Zhan, Jianming .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (13) :9391-9402
[2]   Optimal scale combination selection for multi-scale decision tables based on three-way decision [J].
Cheng, Yunlong ;
Zhang, Qinghua ;
Wang, Guoyin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, 2021, 12 (02) :281-301
[3]   Optimal scale selection and attribute reduction in multi-scale decision tables based on three-way decision [J].
Cheng, Yunlong ;
Zhang, Qinghua ;
Wang, Guoyin ;
Hu, Bao Qing .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2020, 541 :36-59
[4]   A three-way decision methodology to multi-attribute decision-making in multi-scale decision information systems [J].
Deng, Jiang ;
Zhan, Jianming ;
Wu, Wei-Zhi .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 568 :175-198
[5]   A spherical fuzzy methodology integrating maximizing deviation and TOPSIS methods [J].
Farrokhizadeh, Elmira ;
Seyfi-Shishavan, Seyed Amin ;
Gundogdu, Fatma Kutlu ;
Donyatalab, Yaser ;
Kahraman, Cengiz ;
Seifi, Seyyed Hadi .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 101
[6]   THE UTILITY ANALYSIS OF CHOICES INVOLVING RISK [J].
Friedman, Milton ;
Savage, L. J. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1948, 56 (04) :279-304
[7]   Double-quantitative rough sets, optimal scale selection and reduction in multi-scale dominance IF decision tables [J].
Huang, Bing ;
Li, Huaxiong ;
Feng, Guofu ;
Guo, Chunxiang ;
Chen, Dafeng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2021, 130 (130) :170-191
[8]   A novel three-way decision model under multiple-criteria environment [J].
Jia, Fan ;
Liu, Peide .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 471 :29-51
[9]   PROMETHEE II method based on variable precision fuzzy rough sets with fuzzy neighborhoods [J].
Jiang, Haibo ;
Zhan, Jianming ;
Chen, Degang .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2021, 54 (02) :1281-1319
[10]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291