Future precipitation changes in California: Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 intermodel spread and its drivers

被引:4
|
作者
Petrova, Desislava [1 ]
Tarin-Carrasco, Patricia [1 ]
Sekulic, Aleksandar [2 ]
Lukovic, Jelena [3 ]
Reniu, Maria Gali [4 ]
Rodo, Xavier [1 ,5 ]
Cvijanovic, Ivana [1 ]
机构
[1] Barcelona Inst Global Hlth ISGlobal, Climate & Hlth Grp, CANU, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[2] Univ Belgrade, Fac Civil Engn, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Univ Belgrade, Fac Geog, Belgrade, Serbia
[4] Univ Barcelona, Fac Phys, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[5] ICREA, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
California; CMIP5; CMIP6; ENSO teleconnection; Precipitation change; MODEL INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT; EL-NINO; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WINTER PRECIPITATION; ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION; EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN; SIMULATED CLIMATE; PATTERNS; ENSO; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1002/joc.8449
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
California is one of the major uncertainty hotspots for climate change, as climate models have historically been split between projecting wetter and drier future conditions over the region. We analysed the future (mid-century and end-century) projections of California's winter precipitation changes from the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), and studied its respective model agreement in comparison to the previous CMIP5 projections. Over northern California more than two thirds of the models in each ensemble agree on wetter future conditions. However, over southern California both ensembles show highly uncertain precipitation changes, with model projections almost equally divided between wetter or drier conditions. Projected end-century precipitation changes range from -30% to +70% in CMIP5 and -20% to +80% in CMIP6. The CMIP6 ensemble mean changes are generally wetter and show larger model disagreement compared to CMIP5. Distribution of year-to-year precipitation indicates more extremely wet or dry years over southern California in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5, with some models suggesting that the five wettest years account for as much as similar to 55% of the 20-year rainfall, and the five driest for as little as similar to 5%. Dynamically, both ensembles project weakened subsidence over Baja California that is stronger in CMIP6 than in CMIP5, in line with the wetter mean conditions in CMIP6. In the western tropical Pacific we find strengthening of the Hadley circulation in CMIP6 that is not seen in CMIP5, and more El Nino than La Nina conditions in the equatorial Pacific. More CMIP6 models also project an increase in ENSO events compared to CMIP5, and a stronger impact of ENSO on California's precipitation is found in CMIP6 than in CMIP5. These factors also contribute to larger model disagreement and more extremely wet or dry years over southern California in CMIP6.
引用
收藏
页码:2207 / 2229
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models over MENA Region Using Historical Simulations and Future Projections
    Hamed, Mohammed Magdy
    Nashwan, Mohamed Salem
    Shiru, Mohammed Sanusi
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [42] Assessing the Representation of Synoptic Variability Associated With California Extreme Precipitation in CMIP6 Models
    Norris, Jesse
    Hall, Alex
    Chen, Di
    Thackeray, Chad W.
    Madakumbura, Gavin D.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2021, 126 (06)
  • [43] Added value of CMIP6 models over CMIP5 models in simulating the climatological precipitation extremes in China
    Luo, Neng
    Guo, Yan
    Chou, Jieming
    Gao, Zhibo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (02) : 1148 - 1164
  • [44] Historical evolution and future trend of Northern Hemisphere snow cover in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Zhu, Xian
    Lee, Shao-Yi
    Wen, Xiaohang
    Wei, Zhigang
    Ji, Zhenming
    Zheng, Zhiyuan
    Dong, Wenjie
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (06)
  • [45] Comparison of past and future simulations of ENSO in CMIP5/PMIP3 and CMIP6/PMIP4 models
    Brown, Josephine R.
    Brierley, Chris M.
    An, Soon-Il
    Guarino, Maria-Vittoria
    Stevenson, Samantha
    Williams, Charles J. R.
    Zhang, Qiong
    Zhao, Anni
    Abe-Ouchi, Ayako
    Braconnot, Pascale
    Brady, Esther C.
    Chandan, Deepak
    D'Agostino, Roberta
    Guo, Chuncheng
    LeGrande, Allegra N.
    Lohmann, Gerrit
    Morozova, Polina A.
    Ohgaito, Rumi
    O'ishi, Ryouta
    Otto-Bliesner, Bette L.
    Peltier, W. Richard
    Shi, Xiaoxu
    Sime, Louise
    Volodin, Evgeny M.
    Zhang, Zhongshi
    Zheng, Weipeng
    CLIMATE OF THE PAST, 2020, 16 (05) : 1777 - 1805
  • [46] Colombian climatology in CMIP5/CMIP6 models: Persistent biases and improvements
    Arias, Paola A.
    Ortega, Geusep
    Villegas, Laura D.
    Martinez, J. Alejandro
    REVISTA FACULTAD DE INGENIERIA-UNIVERSIDAD DE ANTIOQUIA, 2021, (100): : 75 - 96
  • [47] The Arctic Surface Climate in CMIP6: Status and Developments since CMIP5
    Davy, Richard
    Outten, Stephen
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (18) : 8047 - 8068
  • [48] Uncertainty of ENSO-amplitude projections in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Beobide-Arsuaga, Goratz
    Bayr, Tobias
    Reintges, Annika
    Latif, Mojib
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2021, 56 (11-12) : 3875 - 3888
  • [49] Projected Future Changes in the Asian Monsoon: A Comparison of CMIP3 and CMIP5 Model Results
    Ogata, Tomomichi
    Ueda, Hiroaki
    Inoue, Tomoshige
    Hayasaki, Masamitsu
    Yoshida, Ai
    Watanabe, Shigeru
    Kira, Mayuko
    Ooshiro, Megumi
    Kumai, Atsuki
    JOURNAL OF THE METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2014, 92 (03) : 207 - 225
  • [50] Evaluation of the Antarctic Circumpolar Wave Simulated by CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Lu, Zhichao
    Zhao, Tianbao
    Zhou, Weican
    ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (09)