Future precipitation changes in California: Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 intermodel spread and its drivers

被引:4
|
作者
Petrova, Desislava [1 ]
Tarin-Carrasco, Patricia [1 ]
Sekulic, Aleksandar [2 ]
Lukovic, Jelena [3 ]
Reniu, Maria Gali [4 ]
Rodo, Xavier [1 ,5 ]
Cvijanovic, Ivana [1 ]
机构
[1] Barcelona Inst Global Hlth ISGlobal, Climate & Hlth Grp, CANU, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[2] Univ Belgrade, Fac Civil Engn, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Univ Belgrade, Fac Geog, Belgrade, Serbia
[4] Univ Barcelona, Fac Phys, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
[5] ICREA, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
关键词
California; CMIP5; CMIP6; ENSO teleconnection; Precipitation change; MODEL INTERCOMPARISON PROJECT; EL-NINO; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WINTER PRECIPITATION; ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION; EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN; SIMULATED CLIMATE; PATTERNS; ENSO; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1002/joc.8449
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
California is one of the major uncertainty hotspots for climate change, as climate models have historically been split between projecting wetter and drier future conditions over the region. We analysed the future (mid-century and end-century) projections of California's winter precipitation changes from the latest Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), and studied its respective model agreement in comparison to the previous CMIP5 projections. Over northern California more than two thirds of the models in each ensemble agree on wetter future conditions. However, over southern California both ensembles show highly uncertain precipitation changes, with model projections almost equally divided between wetter or drier conditions. Projected end-century precipitation changes range from -30% to +70% in CMIP5 and -20% to +80% in CMIP6. The CMIP6 ensemble mean changes are generally wetter and show larger model disagreement compared to CMIP5. Distribution of year-to-year precipitation indicates more extremely wet or dry years over southern California in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5, with some models suggesting that the five wettest years account for as much as similar to 55% of the 20-year rainfall, and the five driest for as little as similar to 5%. Dynamically, both ensembles project weakened subsidence over Baja California that is stronger in CMIP6 than in CMIP5, in line with the wetter mean conditions in CMIP6. In the western tropical Pacific we find strengthening of the Hadley circulation in CMIP6 that is not seen in CMIP5, and more El Nino than La Nina conditions in the equatorial Pacific. More CMIP6 models also project an increase in ENSO events compared to CMIP5, and a stronger impact of ENSO on California's precipitation is found in CMIP6 than in CMIP5. These factors also contribute to larger model disagreement and more extremely wet or dry years over southern California in CMIP6.
引用
收藏
页码:2207 / 2229
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of CMIP6 for historical temperature and precipitation over the Tibetan Plateau and its comparison with CMIP5
    Zhu Yu-Yao
    Yang Saini
    ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (03) : 239 - 251
  • [2] Mechanisms of Future Changes in Equatorial Upwelling: CMIP5 Intermodel Analysis
    Terada, Mio
    Minobe, Shoshiro
    Deutsch, Curtis
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (02) : 497 - 510
  • [3] Future Changes in Wet and Dry Season Characteristics in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Simulations
    Wainwright, Caroline M.
    Black, Emily
    Allan, Richard P.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2021, 22 (09) : 2339 - 2357
  • [4] A comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 projections for precipitation to observational data: the case of Northeastern Iran
    Zamani, Yasin
    Hashemi Monfared, Seyed Arman
    Azhdari Moghaddam, Mehdi
    Hamidianpour, Mohsen
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2020, 142 (3-4) : 1613 - 1623
  • [5] Evaluation of seasonal teleconnections to remote drivers of Australian rainfall in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Chung, Christine
    Boschat, Ghyslaine
    Taschetto, Andrea
    Narsey, Sugata
    Mcgregor, Shayne
    Santoso, Agus
    Delage, Francois
    JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE EARTH SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2023, 73 (03) : 219 - 261
  • [6] Wind energy resource over Europe under CMIP6 future climate projections: What changes from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Carvalho, D.
    Rocha, A.
    Costoya, X.
    DeCastro, M.
    Gomez-Gesteira, M.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 151
  • [7] Intermodel Spread in the Impact of the Springtime Pacific Meridional Mode on Following-Winter ENSO Tied to Simulation of the ITCZ in CMIP5/CMIP6
    Zheng, Yuqiong
    Chen, Wen
    Chen, Shangfeng
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 48 (17)
  • [8] Asymmetric Arctic and Antarctic Warming and Its Intermodel Spread in CMIP6
    Zhang, Yihan
    Kong, Yunqi
    Yang, Song
    Hu, Xiaoming
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2023, 36 (23) : 8299 - 8310
  • [9] Comparative Assessment and Future Prediction Using CMIP6 and CMIP5 for Annual Precipitation and Extreme Precipitation Simulation
    Li, Jingjing
    Huo, Ran
    Chen, Hua
    Zhao, Ying
    Zhao, Tianhui
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [10] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 simulations of precipitation in China and the East Asian summer monsoon
    Xin, Xiaoge
    Wu, Tongwen
    Zhang, Jie
    Yao, Junchen
    Fang, Yongjie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2020, 40 (15) : 6423 - 6440