Impact of left ventricular assist device complications on heart transplant outcomes under the 2018 heart transplant allocation policy

被引:5
|
作者
Siems, Chesney [1 ]
Cogswell, Rebecca [2 ]
Masotti, Maria [3 ]
Schultz, Jessica [4 ]
Cowger, Jennifer [5 ]
Shaffer, Andrew [1 ]
John, Ranjit [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Surg, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Biostat, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Detroit, MI USA
[6] Dept Surg, Div Cardiothorac Surg, 420 Delaware St SE,MMC 207, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY | 2024年 / 167卷 / 03期
关键词
adult cardiac; heart transplant; left ventricular assist device; mechanical circulatory support; REGISTRY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.08.052
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The study objective was to determine the impact of left ventricular assist device complications on post-heart transplant survival before and after the 2018 US heart transplant allocation policy change. Methods: Adult patients (age>18 years) supported by left ventricular assist devices at the time of listing or transplantation in the United Network for Organ Sharing between October 18, 2015, and December 31, 2021, were included. Left ventricular assist device complications were defined by status at transplant (nonelective 1A in the prior era or new era status 2 or 3). Post-transplant survival (primary analysis) and baseline characteristics were compared among those with and without left ventricular assist device complications and by allocation era using multivariable Cox regression analyses. Results: The primary analysis included 4160 patients with left ventricular assist devices who underwent heart transplant (prior era n = 2458, new era n = 1702). Patients who underwent heart transplant with left ventricular assist device complications were on left ventricular assist device support longer under the new era (498 days vs 423 days P < .001). Post-transplant survival was highest in the prior era among those without left ventricular assist device complications. Patients who underwent transplantation in the prior era with a complication and in the new era without complications were not statistically different. Left ventricular assist device complications in the new era were associated with the highest post-transplant mortality (status 2 adjusted hazard ratio, 1.87, 95% confidence interval, 1.31-2.67, P < .001, status 3 adjusted hazard ratio, 1.50, 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.04, P = .009). Conclusions: Left ventricular assist device complications in the new era are associated with increased post-transplant mortality. As a heart allocation score is being considered, modeling time on left ventricular assist device support to promote heart transplant before development of left ventricular assist device-related complications may improve outcomes for patients with left ventricular assist devices.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical outcomes in sensitized heart transplant patients bridged with ventricular assist devices
    Kidambi, Sumanth
    Mohamedali, Burhan
    Bhat, Geetha
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 29 (06) : 499 - 505
  • [32] Psychiatric problems of heart transplant candidates with left ventricular assist devices
    Baba A.
    Hirata G.
    Yokoyama F.
    Kenmoku K.
    Tsuchiya M.
    Kyo S.
    Toyoshima R.
    Journal of Artificial Organs, 2006, 9 (4) : 203 - 208
  • [33] Impact of durable ventricular assist devices on post-transplant outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease
    Cedars, Ari
    Burchill, Luke
    Roche, S. Lucy
    Menachem, Jonathan
    Axsom, Kelly
    Tecson, Kristen
    CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE, 2019, 14 (06) : 958 - 962
  • [34] Impact of increased time at the highest urgency category on heart transplant outcomes for candidates with ventricular assist devices
    Colvin, Monica
    Miranda-Herrera, David
    Gustafson, Sally K.
    Heubner, Brooke
    Skeans, Melissa
    Wang, Xinyue
    Snyder, Jon J.
    Kasiske, Bertram L.
    Israni, Ajay K.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 35 (03): : 326 - 334
  • [35] The Impact of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections on Postcardiac Transplant Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chahal, Daljeet
    Sepehry, Amir A.
    Nazzari, Hamed
    Wright, Alissa Jade
    Toma, Mustafa
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2019, 65 (08) : 827 - 836
  • [36] The effect of recipient BMI on waitlist and post-transplant outcomes after the 2018 heart transplant allocation policy change
    Patel, Jay N.
    Rabkin, David G.
    Sperry, Brett W.
    Bhardwaj, Anju
    Chung, Joshua S.
    Abramov, Dmitry
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (07) : 1896 - 1904
  • [37] Ventricular Assist Device Infections: Epidemiology, Treatment, and Outcomes in Transplant
    Demarco, Grace B.
    Kumar, Rebecca N.
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [38] Impact of ventricular assist device use on pediatric heart transplant waitlist mortality: Analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database
    Butto, Arene
    Wright, Lydia K.
    Dyal, Jameson
    Mao, Chad Y.
    Garcia, Richard
    Mahle, William T.
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 28 (04)
  • [39] Short-term outcomes of heart transplant patients bridged with Impella 5.5 ventricular assist device
    Haddad, Osama
    Sareyyupoglu, Basar
    Goswami, Rohan M.
    Bitargil, Macit
    Patel, Parag C.
    Jacob, Samuel
    Ahmed, Magdy M. El-Sayed M.
    Moreno, Juan Carlos Leoni
    Yip, Daniel S.
    Landolfo, Kevin
    Pham, Si M.
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2023, 10 (04): : 2298 - 2306
  • [40] Characteristics and outcomes of left ventricular assist device recipients transplanted before and after the new donor heart allocation system
    Doulamis, Ilias P.
    Inampudi, Chakradhari
    Kourek, Christos
    Mandarada, Tejaswini
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Asleh, Rabea
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2022, 46 (12) : 2460 - 2468