Prognostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in Patients with Diffuse Gliomas

被引:0
|
作者
Busic, Marija [1 ]
Rumboldt, Zoran [2 ]
Cerina, Dora [3 ]
Busic, Zeljko [1 ]
Dolic, Kresimir [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Split, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Spinciceva 1, Split 21000, Croatia
[2] Univ Rijeka, Sch Med, Ul Brce Branchetta 20-1, Rijeka 51000, Croatia
[3] Univ Hosp Split, Dept Oncol, Spinciceva 1, Split 21000, Croatia
[4] Univ Split, Sch Med, Soltanska 1, Split 21000, Croatia
[5] Univ Dept Hlth Studies, Univ Split, Ul Rudera Boskovica 35, Split 21000, Croatia
关键词
glioma; magnetic resonance imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; biomarkers; APPEARING WHITE-MATTER; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; GRADE; INVASION; ASTROCYTOMAS; SPECTROSCOPY; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.3390/cancers16040681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary This retrospective study aimed to analyze ADC values in the tissue surrounding enhancing gliomas and in the normal-appearing white matter. The goal was to find potential correlations of these values with treatment response and survival of patients. Patients, divided into short and long survival groups, underwent stereotactic biopsy or maximal surgical resection, followed by concomitant radio-chemotherapy. Baseline and follow-up MRI scans revealed significant differences in NAWM ADC values between the groups. Overall, the study suggests that ADC values in NAWM could serve as a prognostic biomarker for diffuse glioma patients.Abstract This study aimed to evaluate potential posttreatment changes in ADC values within the tissue surrounding the enhancing lesion, particularly in areas not exhibiting MRI characteristics of involvement. Additionally, the objective was to investigate the correlations among ADC values, treatment response, and survival outcomes in individuals diagnosed with gliomas. This retrospective study included a total of 49 patients that underwent either stereotactic biopsy or maximal surgical resection. Histologically confirmed as Grade III or IV gliomas, all cases adhered to the 2016 and 2021 WHO classifications, with subsequent radio-chemotherapy administered post-surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: short and long survival groups. Baseline and follow-up MRI scans were obtained on a 1.5 T MRI scanner. Two ROI circles were positioned near the enhancing area, one ROI in the NAWM ipsilateral to the neoplasm and another symmetrically in the contralateral hemisphere on ADC maps. At follow-up there was a significant difference in both ipsilateral and contralateral NAWM between the two groups, -0.0857 (p = 0.004) and -0.0607 (p = 0.037), respectively. There was a weak negative correlation between survival and ADC values in ipsilateral and contralateral NAWM at the baseline with the correlation coefficient -0.328 (p = 0.02) and -0.302 (p = 0.04), respectively. The correlation was stronger at the follow-up. The findings indicate that ADC values in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) may function as a prognostic biomarker in patients with diffuse gliomas.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient value as prognostic factor for renal cell carcinoma aggressiveness
    Ahmad, Medhat Ibraheem Mohammad
    Sabr, Mohammad
    Roshy, Eman
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2019, 50 (01)
  • [32] Deep learning based apparent diffusion coefficient map generation from multi-parametric MR images for patients with diffuse gliomas
    Eidex, Zach
    Safari, Mojtaba
    Wynne, Jacob
    Qiu, Richard L. J.
    Wang, Tonghe
    Hernandez, David Viar
    Shu, Hui-Kuo
    Mao, Hui
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 52 (02) : 847 - 855
  • [33] MRI apparent diffusion coefficient reflects histopathologic subtype, axonal disruption, and tumor fraction in diffuse-type grade II gliomas
    Khayal, Inas S.
    VandenBerg, Scott R.
    Smith, Kenneth J.
    Cloyd, Colleen P.
    Chang, Susan M.
    Cha, Soonmee
    Nelson, Sarah J.
    McKnight, Tracy R.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 13 (11) : 1192 - 1201
  • [34] Alterations of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the brain of rats chronically exposed to lead acetate
    Lopez-Larrubia, Pilar
    Cauli, Omar
    TOXICOLOGY, 2011, 281 (1-3) : 1 - 6
  • [35] MRI apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC): A biomarker for prostate cancer after radiation therapy
    Scialpi, Michele
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Scialpi, Pietro
    D'Andrea, Alfredo
    Mancioli, Francesco Maria
    Mignogna, Marcello
    Di Blasi, Aldo
    Trippa, Fabio
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 47 (06): : 448 - 451
  • [36] Clinical Utility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in Patients With Prostate Cancer: Can ADC Values Contribute to Assess the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer?
    Itou, Yasushi
    Nakanishi, Katsuyuki
    Narumi, Yoshifumi
    Nishizawa, Yasuko
    Tsukuma, Hideaki
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (01) : 167 - 172
  • [37] Posttreatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Changes in the Periresectional Area in Patients with Glioblastoma
    van der Hoorn, Anouk
    Yan, Jiun-Lin
    Larkin, Timothy J.
    Boonzaier, Natalie R.
    Matys, Tomasz
    Price, Stephen J.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 92 : 159 - 165
  • [38] Correlations between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and Prognosis in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Drago, Silvia Girolama
    Maino, Cesare
    Giandola, Teresa Paola
    Franco, Paolo Niccolo
    Corso, Rocco
    Talei Franzesi, Cammillo
    Pecorelli, Anna
    Ippolito, Davide
    LIFE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [39] Usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for predicting the consistency of intracranial meningiomas
    Yogi, Akira
    Koga, Tomomi
    Azama, Kimei
    Higa, Daichi
    Ogawa, Kazuhiko
    Watanabe, Takashi
    Ishiuchi, Shogo
    Murayama, Sadayuki
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2014, 38 (06) : 802 - 807
  • [40] Robust Estimation of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in Heterogeneous Solid Tumors
    Walker-Samuel, Simon
    Orton, Matthew
    McPhail, Lesley D.
    Robinson, Simon P.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2009, 62 (02) : 420 - 429