Analytical framework for institutional power orientation towards earthquake resilience: A case study on urban development policies in Karaj, Iran

被引:3
作者
Fallahi, Mahsa [1 ]
Aminzadeh, Behnaz [1 ]
Zebardast, Esfandiar [1 ]
Nourian, Farshad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Fine Arts, Fac Urban Dev, 16th Azar St,Enghelab Sq, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Urban resilience; Urban planning; Depoliticization; Institutional power; Political orientations; Earthquake; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SYSTEMS; PLACE; DISASTERS; POLITICS; CITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scs.2024.105212
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The concept of urban resilience, originating from ecological sciences, poses challenges in its introduction and explanation as an objective and approach in urban planning. Expanding the social and normative dimensions of urban resilience is challenging due to its conservative and non-political ecological background. Critically, the reductionist approach and depoliticization of urban resilience in planning are significant concerns. This paper addresses the analysis of institutional power orientations in defining the concept of urban resilience and targeting its achievement. According to this purpose, this paper provides a theoretical framework for analyzing institutional power orientations towards earthquake resilience, developed in two primary parts, as the main novelty and contribution of the proposed research. The city of Karaj is selected as a case study to test this framework. The research methodology involves a triple analysis of epistemology, ontology, and axiology of resilience from institutional power point of view, utilizing qualitative content analysis, semi -structured interviews, and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) questionnaire. In conclusion, emphasizing the importance of exploring the logical connection between ideas, the need for attention, and analyzing decision -taking processes is highlighted based on the research findings.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Social and ecological resilience: are they related?
    Adger, WN
    [J]. PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (03) : 347 - 364
  • [2] From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world
    Ahern, Jack
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2011, 100 (04) : 341 - 343
  • [3] Urban resilience: A vague or an evolutionary concept?
    Amirzadeh, Melika
    Sobhaninia, Saeideh
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 81
  • [4] SIMULATION IN PLANNING URBAN SOCIAL-POLICY
    ANDERSON, JR
    LIENESCH, WC
    PATTON, CV
    [J]. SIMULATION, 1975, 25 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [5] Capacitating urban governance and planning systems to drive transformative resilience
    Asadzadeh, Asad
    Fekete, Alexander
    Khazai, Bijan
    Moghadas, Mahsa
    Zebardast, Esfandiar
    Basirat, Maysam
    Koetter, Theo
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 96
  • [6] Transformative Resilience: An Overview of Its Structure, Evolution, and Trends
    Asadzadeh, Asad
    Khavarian-Garmsir, Amir Reza
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    Salehi, Pourya
    Kotter, Theo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (22)
  • [7] Theories of power and social change. Power contestations and their implications for research on social change and innovation
    Avelino, Flor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL POWER, 2021, 14 (03) : 425 - 448
  • [8] Power in Sustainability Transitions: Analysing power and (dis)empowerment in transformative change towards sustainability
    Avelino, Flor
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2017, 27 (06) : 505 - 520
  • [9] Transformational resilience thinking: putting people, power and politics at the heart of urban climate resilience
    Bahadur, Aditya
    Tanner, Thomas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 2014, 26 (01) : 200 - 214
  • [10] Bautista-Puig N., 2022, CITIES, V126, P103715, DOI [10.1016/j.cities.2022.103715, DOI 10.1016/J.CITIES.2022.103715]