共 34 条
Assessment of Online Marketing and Sales Practices Among Recreational Cannabis Retailers in Five US Cities
被引:9
作者:
Duan, Zongshuan
[1
,7
]
Kasson, Erin
[2
]
Ruchelli, Sabrina
[3
]
Rajamahanty, Aishwarya
[2
]
Williams, River
[4
]
Sridharan, Priyanka
[5
]
Sapra, Tanvi
[5
]
Dopke, Campbell
[1
]
Pannell, Alexandria
[4
]
Nakshatri, Sapna
[2
]
Berg, Carla J.
[1
,6
]
Cavazos-Rehg, Patricia A.
[2
]
机构:
[1] George Washington Univ, Milken Inst Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Prevent & Community Hlth, Washington, DC USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Psychiat, Sch Med, 660 South Euclid Ave,Box 8134, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Beasley Sch Law, Ctr Publ Hlth Law Res, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] George Washington Univ, Milken Inst Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth, Washington, DC USA
[5] George Washington Univ, Milken Inst Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Washington, DC USA
[6] George Washington Univ, George Washington Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[7] Georgia State Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词:
cannabis;
marijuana;
marketing;
health communication;
health policy;
YOUNG-ADULTS;
MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION;
SURVEILLANCE TOOL;
TOBACCO;
COLORADO;
HEALTH;
ENVIRONMENT;
PRODUCTS;
EXPOSURE;
D O I:
10.1089/can.2022.0334
中图分类号:
R9 [药学];
学科分类号:
1007 ;
摘要:
Background: With more states legalizing recreational cannabis, examining cannabis retail and marketing is crucial, as it may influence consumers' perceptions and behaviors. Particularly understudied is online cannabis retail.Methods: In Spring 2022, coders collected and analyzed data regarding retailer characteristics, age verification, and marketing strategies (e.g., product availability, health-related content, promotions, website imagery) among 195 cannabis retail websites in five U.S. cities (Denver, Colorado; Seattle, Washington; Portland, Oregon; Las Vegas, Nevada; Los Angeles, California). Descriptive analyses characterized the websites overall and across cities.Results: Overall, 80.5% verified age for website entry, and 92.8% offered online purchases (92.3% of retailers in Seattle, where prohibited). Of these, 82.9% required age verification for purchases, and 30.9% offered delivery. Almost all (>92%) offered flower/bud, concentrates, edibles, vaping devices, topicals, and tinctures. Health warnings were displayed on 38.3% of websites. Although all five states required health warnings regarding use during pregnancy, only 10.3% had these warnings. In addition, 59.0% posted some unsubstantiated health claims, most often indicating physical and mental health benefits (44.6%). Although Colorado, Washington, and Oregon prohibit health claims, 51.2-53.8% of these retailers posted them. Discounts, samples, or promotions were present on 90.8% of websites; 63.6% had subscription/membership programs. Subpopulations represented in website content included the following: 27.2% teens/young adults, 26.2% veterans, 7.2% sexual/gender minorities, and 5.6% racial/ethnic minorities. Imagery also targeted young people (e.g., 29.7% party/cool/popularity, 18.5% celebrity/influencer endorsement).Conclusions: Regulatory efforts are needed to better monitor promotional strategies and regulatory compliance (e.g., health claims, youth-oriented content, underage access) among online cannabis retailers.
引用
收藏
页码:e1075 / e1090
页数:16
相关论文