Sparse moment quadrature for uncertainty modeling and quantification

被引:6
作者
Guan, Xuefei [1 ]
机构
[1] China Acad Engn Phys, Grad Sch, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Moment quadrature; Smolyak rule; High-dimensional; Uncertainty modeling; Uncertainty quantification; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS; CUBATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109665
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This study presents the Sparse Moment Quadrature (SMQ) method, a new uncertainty quantification technique for high-dimensional complex computational models. These models pose a challenge due to the long evaluation times and numerous random parameters. The SMQ method extends the existing moment quadrature method by incorporating the Smolyak rule to reduce the full tensor formula to a sparse tensor formula. The univariate Gauss quadrature rule is derived using the Hankel matrix of moments, allowing the rule to retain polynomial exactness under any distribution with bounded raw moments. Proper decompositions and transformations are used to handle multi-dimensional problems with correlated variables. The cost and accuracy of the method are analyzed and upper bounds are given. The SMQ method is demonstrated through examples involving 10-dimensional problems, dynamical oscillation, 20-, 100-, and 1000-dimensional nonlinear problems, and a practical membrane vibration problem. The proposed method yields nearly identical results to the conventional Monte Carlo method with thousands to millions of model evaluations. Overall, the SMQ method provides a practical solution to uncertainty quantification of high-dimensional problems involving complex computational models.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Uncertainty Quantification in Aeroelasticity [J].
Beran, Philip ;
Stanford, Bret ;
Schrock, Christopher .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 49, 2017, 49 :361-386
[32]   Multiphysics Modeling and Uncertainty Quantification for an Active Composite Reflector [J].
Peterson, Lee D. ;
Bradford, S. Case ;
Schiermeier, John E. ;
Agnes, Gregory S. ;
Basinger, Scott A. .
OPTICAL MODELING AND PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS VI, 2013, 8840
[33]   A Modified Polynomial Chaos Modeling Approach for Uncertainty Quantification [J].
Dolatsara, Majid Ahadi ;
Varma, Ambrish ;
Keshavan, Kumar ;
Swaminathan, Madhavan .
2019 INTERNATIONAL APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETICS SOCIETY SYMPOSIUM (ACES), 2019,
[34]   Modeling and material uncertainty quantification of RC structural components [J].
Hariri-Ardebili, Mohammad Amin ;
Segura Jr, Christopher L. ;
Sattar, Siamak .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2024, 106
[35]   Extending OpenKIM with an Uncertainty Quantification Toolkit for Molecular Modeling [J].
Kurniawan, Yonatan ;
Petrie, Cody L. ;
Transtrum, Mark K. ;
Tadmor, Ellad B. ;
Elliott, Ryan S. ;
Karls, Daniel S. ;
Wen, Mingjian .
2022 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-SCIENCE (ESCIENCE 2022), 2022, :367-377
[36]   Bayesian modeling and uncertainty quantification for descriptive social networks [J].
Nemmers, Thomas ;
Narayan, Anjana ;
Banerjee, Sudipto .
STATISTICS AND ITS INTERFACE, 2019, 12 (01) :181-191
[37]   Statistical Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Computational Molecular Modeling [J].
Rasheed, Muhibur ;
Clement, Nathan ;
Bhowmick, Abhishek ;
Bajaj, Chandrajit L. .
IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2019, 16 (04) :1154-1167
[38]   Bayesian hierarchical uncertainty quantification by structural equation modeling [J].
Jiang, Xiaomo ;
Mahadevan, Sankaran .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2009, 80 (6-7) :717-737
[39]   Multiphysics modeling and uncertainty quantification of tribocorrosion in aluminum alloys [J].
Wang, Kaiwen ;
Wang, Yinan ;
Yue, Xiaowei ;
Cai, Wenjun .
CORROSION SCIENCE, 2021, 178
[40]   Conservative Surrogate Modeling of Crosstalk with Application to Uncertainty Quantification [J].
Manfredi, Paolo .
2023 IEEE 27TH WORKSHOP ON SIGNAL AND POWER INTEGRITY, SPI, 2023,