Evaluation of ENSO in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models and its significance in the rainfall in Northeast Thailand

被引:6
作者
De Silva, Yenushi K. [1 ]
Babel, Mukand S. [1 ]
Abatan, Abayomi A. [2 ]
Khadka, Dibesh [1 ]
Shanmugasundaram, Jothiganesh [3 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Technol, Sch Engn & Technol, Water Engn & Management, POB 4, Klongluang 12120, Pathumthani, Thailand
[2] Univ Exeter, Coll Engn Math & Phys Sci, Exeter, England
[3] Reg Bur Bangkok RBB, United Nations World Food Programme, Wave Pl, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
MEAN STATE; EL-NINO; COLD-TONGUE; VARIABILITY; CLIMATE; PRECIPITATION; EVENTS; TELECONNECTIONS; TEMPERATURE; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00704-023-04585-z
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a significant form of internal climate variability resulting from the interactions between the atmosphere and ocean in the tropical Pacific. It is a main driver of interannual rainfall variability in Northeast Thailand, where rainfed agriculture is one of the largest economic sectors. Therefore, it is essential to understand the ability of climate models to simulate the basic characteristics of ENSO phenomena and project its impacts in the region. We evaluated the ability of 12 climate models from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and their 12 predecessor models from the fifth phase (CMIP5) to simulate ENSO and its impact on rainfall over Northeast Thailand using thirteen performance metrics under seven criteria considering the simulation of observed indices, pattern, variability, peaks and seasonal phase locking of ENSO. The intensity and frequency of the ENSO events were projected for the near future (2021-2050). Although six CMIP5 and eight CMIP6 models performed well in simulating half of the ENSO evaluation metrics (performance score > 40%) such as ENSO variability, seasonal phase locking, location of ENSO variability, and dominant secondary peak in SST variability, we did not find very compelling evidence of improved ENSO simulation in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5 models. However, high rainfall in extreme La Nina events and low rainfall in extreme El Nino events with rainfall anomalies of 0.4 mm/day and - 0.3 mm/day, respectively were observed over Northeast Thailand due to the interaction of the easterly winds from the Pacific Ocean with the south-westerly flow from the Indian Ocean. The corresponding sea level pressure maps further confirmed the mechanisms associated with this phenomenon over the region. The ensemble averages of models from both phases predicted an increase in intensity (by 32-47%) and frequency (by 10-50%) in the near-future (2021-2050) with a slightly higher increase by CMIP6 models compared to CMIP5 models under medium and high emission scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 906
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of trends in the Hadley circulation between CMIP6 and CMIP5
    Xia, Yan
    Hu, Yongyun
    Liu, Jiping
    [J]. SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (19) : 1667 - 1674
  • [42] Uncertainty in Projection of Climate Extremes: A Comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Shaobo
    Chen, Jie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF METEOROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 35 (04) : 646 - 662
  • [43] The relative performance of Australian CMIP5 models based on rainfall and ENSO metrics
    Smith, Ian
    Syktus, Jozef
    Rotstayn, Leon
    Jeffrey, Stephen
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN METEOROLOGICAL AND OCEANOGRAPHIC JOURNAL, 2013, 63 (01) : 205 - 212
  • [44] Extra-tropical atmospheric response to ENSO in the CMIP5 models
    Hurwitz, Margaret M.
    Calvo, Natalia
    Garfinkel, Chaim I.
    Butler, Amy H.
    Ineson, Sarah
    Cagnazzo, Chiara
    Manzini, Elisa
    Pena-Ortiz, Cristina
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (12) : 3367 - 3376
  • [45] Evaluation and comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance in simulating the runoff
    Guo, Hai
    Zhan, Chesheng
    Ning, Like
    Li, Zhonghe
    Hu, Shi
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 149 (3-4) : 1451 - 1470
  • [46] ENSO representation in climate models: from CMIP3 to CMIP5
    Bellenger, H.
    Guilyardi, E.
    Leloup, J.
    Lengaigne, M.
    Vialard, J.
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2014, 42 (7-8) : 1999 - 2018
  • [47] Evaluation of CMIP5 and CMIP6 simulations of historical surface air temperature extremes using proper evaluation methods
    Thorarinsdottir, Thordis L.
    Sillmann, Jana
    Haugen, Marion
    Gissibl, Nadine
    Sandstad, Marit
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (12)
  • [48] Analysis of the Southward Wind Shift of ENSO in CMIP5 Models
    Abellan, Esteban
    McGregor, Shayne
    England, Matthew H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2017, 30 (07) : 2415 - 2435
  • [49] Forced Sahel rainfall trends in the CMIP5 archive
    Biasutti, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (04) : 1613 - 1623
  • [50] Evaluation of CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models Based on Weather Types Applied to the South Atlantic Ocean
    Borato, Luana
    Harter Fetter Filho, Antonio Fernando
    Gomes da Silva, Paula
    Javier Mendez, Fernando
    da Fontoura Klein, Antonio Henrique
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2024, 44 (15) : 5580 - 5595