Evaluation of ENSO in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models and its significance in the rainfall in Northeast Thailand

被引:6
作者
De Silva, Yenushi K. [1 ]
Babel, Mukand S. [1 ]
Abatan, Abayomi A. [2 ]
Khadka, Dibesh [1 ]
Shanmugasundaram, Jothiganesh [3 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Technol, Sch Engn & Technol, Water Engn & Management, POB 4, Klongluang 12120, Pathumthani, Thailand
[2] Univ Exeter, Coll Engn Math & Phys Sci, Exeter, England
[3] Reg Bur Bangkok RBB, United Nations World Food Programme, Wave Pl, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
MEAN STATE; EL-NINO; COLD-TONGUE; VARIABILITY; CLIMATE; PRECIPITATION; EVENTS; TELECONNECTIONS; TEMPERATURE; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00704-023-04585-z
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a significant form of internal climate variability resulting from the interactions between the atmosphere and ocean in the tropical Pacific. It is a main driver of interannual rainfall variability in Northeast Thailand, where rainfed agriculture is one of the largest economic sectors. Therefore, it is essential to understand the ability of climate models to simulate the basic characteristics of ENSO phenomena and project its impacts in the region. We evaluated the ability of 12 climate models from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) and their 12 predecessor models from the fifth phase (CMIP5) to simulate ENSO and its impact on rainfall over Northeast Thailand using thirteen performance metrics under seven criteria considering the simulation of observed indices, pattern, variability, peaks and seasonal phase locking of ENSO. The intensity and frequency of the ENSO events were projected for the near future (2021-2050). Although six CMIP5 and eight CMIP6 models performed well in simulating half of the ENSO evaluation metrics (performance score > 40%) such as ENSO variability, seasonal phase locking, location of ENSO variability, and dominant secondary peak in SST variability, we did not find very compelling evidence of improved ENSO simulation in CMIP6 compared to CMIP5 models. However, high rainfall in extreme La Nina events and low rainfall in extreme El Nino events with rainfall anomalies of 0.4 mm/day and - 0.3 mm/day, respectively were observed over Northeast Thailand due to the interaction of the easterly winds from the Pacific Ocean with the south-westerly flow from the Indian Ocean. The corresponding sea level pressure maps further confirmed the mechanisms associated with this phenomenon over the region. The ensemble averages of models from both phases predicted an increase in intensity (by 32-47%) and frequency (by 10-50%) in the near-future (2021-2050) with a slightly higher increase by CMIP6 models compared to CMIP5 models under medium and high emission scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 906
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decomposing Temperature Extremes Errors in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Di Luca, Alejandro
    Pitman, Andrew J.
    de Elia, Ramon
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (14)
  • [32] Blocking Simulations in GFDL GCMs for CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Liu, Ping
    Reed, Kevin A.
    Garner, Stephen T.
    Zhao, Ming
    Zhu, Yuejian
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2022, 35 (15) : 5053 - 5070
  • [33] The impact of ENSO on Southern African rainfall in CMIP5 ocean atmosphere coupled climate models
    Dieppois, Bastien
    Rouault, Mathieu
    New, Mark
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2015, 45 (9-10) : 2425 - 2442
  • [34] Evaluation of Extreme Temperatures Over Australia in the Historical Simulations of CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Deng, Xu
    Perkins-Kirkpatrick, Sarah E.
    Lewis, Sophie C.
    Ritchie, Elizabeth A.
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2021, 9 (07)
  • [35] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating mean and extreme precipitation over East Africa
    Ayugi, Brian
    Zhihong, Jiang
    Zhu, Huanhuan
    Ngoma, Hamida
    Babaousmail, Hassen
    Rizwan, Karim
    Dike, Victor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2021, 41 (15) : 6474 - 6496
  • [36] Historical evolution and future trend of Northern Hemisphere snow cover in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Zhu, Xian
    Lee, Shao-Yi
    Wen, Xiaohang
    Wei, Zhigang
    Ji, Zhenming
    Zheng, Zhiyuan
    Dong, Wenjie
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (06)
  • [37] CMIP5 SCIENTIFIC GAPS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CMIP6
    Stouffer, R. J.
    Eyring, V.
    Meehl, G. A.
    Bony, S.
    Senior, C.
    Stevens, B.
    Taylor, K. E.
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 98 (01) : 95 - +
  • [38] Projections of Greenland climate change from CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Zhang, Qinglin
    Huai, Baojuan
    Ding, Minghu
    Sun, Weijun
    Liu, Weigang
    Yan, Jinpei
    Zhao, Shuhui
    Wang, Yetang
    Wang, Yuzhe
    Wang, Lei
    Che, Jiahang
    Dou, Jiahui
    Kang, Limin
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2024, 232
  • [39] Comparison of Indian Ocean warming simulated by CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Li Jingyi
    Su Jingzhi
    ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 13 (06) : 604 - 611
  • [40] Inconsistency in historical simulations and future projections of temperature and rainfall: A comparison of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models over Southeast Asia
    Hamed, Mohammed Magdy
    Nashwan, Mohamed Salem
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    bin Ismail, Tarmizi
    Wang, Xiao-jun
    Dewan, Ashraf
    Asaduzzaman, Md
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2022, 265