EU in search of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism

被引:77
作者
Bellora, Cecilia [1 ]
Fontagne, Lionel [2 ]
机构
[1] CEPII, 20 Ave Segur, F-75007 Paris, France
[2] Paris Sch Econ & CEPII, Banque France, 31 rue Croix Petits Champs, F-75049 Paris, France
关键词
Carbon Border Adjustment; International trade; Climate change; EMBODIED CARBON; TRADE; COST; CONSEQUENCES; EFFICIENCY; LEAKAGE; TARIFFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106673
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To meet the targets of the EU's Fit for 55 package, the European Commission proposed in July 2021 to implement a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to replace free allocation of Emission Trading System (ETS) allowances for the most trade-exposed emitting industries. CBAM aims to prevent carbon leakage and restore a level playing field in high-emitting industries. Its design, as voted by the European Council in March 2022, by the Parliament in June, and ultimately amended by a provisional agreement between the Council and the European Parliament in December 2022, raises several issues. This paper aims to quantify the economic and environmental impacts of different choices regarding this design. Simulations are based on a dynamic general equilibrium model representing imperfect competition, input-output relations, greenhouse gas emissions, the endogenous price of emission quotas and the presence of free allocation of allowances. We show that CBAM is effective in reducing carbon leakage. But its design increases the price of carbon in the European Emissions Trading Scheme. Competitiveness losses in export markets are expected for downstream sectors that are not covered by the CBAM, as well as for European exporters of high-emitting industries, even in the presence of rebates.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Assessing alternative solutions to carbon leakage [J].
Antimiani, Alessandro ;
Costantini, Valeria ;
Martini, Chiara ;
Salvatici, Luca ;
Tommasino, Maria Cristina .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 :299-311
[2]   Quantifying Economic Damages from Climate Change [J].
Auffhammer, Maximilian .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2018, 32 (04) :33-52
[3]  
Babiker MH, 2005, ENERG J, V26, P99
[4]   Optimal Environmental Border Adjustments Under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade [J].
Balistreri, Edward J. ;
Kaffine, Daniel T. ;
Yonezawa, Hidemichi .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 74 (03) :1037-1075
[5]  
Bellora C., 2019, TRADE GLOBAL V UNPUB
[6]  
Black S., 2022, 22254 INT MON FUND
[7]   Embodied Carbon Tariffs [J].
Boehringer, Christoph ;
Carbone, Jared C. ;
Rutherford, Thomas F. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2018, 120 (01) :183-210
[8]   The efficiency cost of protective measures in climate policy [J].
Boehringer, Christoph ;
Garcia-Muros, Xaquin ;
Cazcarro, Ignacio ;
Arto, Inaki .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 104 :446-454
[9]   Unilateral climate policy design: Efficiency and equity implications of alternative instruments to reduce carbon leakage [J].
Boehringer, Christoph ;
Carbone, Jared C. ;
Rutherford, Thomas F. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 :S208-S217
[10]   Alternative designs for tariffs on embodied carbon: A global cost-effectiveness analysis [J].
Boehringer, Christoph ;
Bye, Brita ;
Faehn, Taran ;
Rosendahl, Knut Einar .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 :S143-S153