Comparison of Alveolar Bone Thickness, Sagittal Root Positions, and Arch Forms in Class I, II, and III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study

被引:0
作者
Haneen, Sumaiyya [1 ]
Rng, Rajesh [2 ]
Gujar, Anadha N. [2 ]
Kondody, Rony [2 ]
机构
[1] Sri Rajiv Gandhi Coll Dent Sci, Dept Orthodont, Bengaluru, India
[2] Sri Rajiv Gandhi Coll Dent Sci & Hosp, Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthopaed, Bengaluru, India
关键词
tooth inclination; sagittal root position; morphology; cephalometry; arch shape; arch form; alveolar bone; INCLINATION; DIMENSIONS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.37272
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the sagittal root position, arch shapes, and alveolar bone thickness in classes I, II, and III of skeletal patterns. Material and methods: Alveolar bone thickness, sagittal root placements, and arch morphologies in classes I, II, and III malocclusions were measured using 30 study models and 30 lateral cephalograms, both with a mean age of 16.5 years. Based on their sagittal relations, 30 participants were classified into three groups each (classes I, II, and III). The ANOVA test was used to calculate the results. Results: Between the three classes, there were statistically significant differences in the AP jaw relationship and root placements. Sagittal root location and dental arch shape showed no statistically significant correlation. Conclusion: There was no correlation between the dental arch form and sagittal root position, and classes II and III were found to have higher mandibular incisor inclination. On all levels, oval arch forms were prevalent.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Evaluation of the fit of preformed nickel titanium arch wires on normal occlusion dental arches [J].
Al-Barakati, Rakhn G. ;
Alqahtani, Nasser D. ;
AlMadi, Abdulaziz ;
Albarakati, Sahar F. ;
Alkofide, Eman A. .
SAUDI DENTAL JOURNAL, 2016, 28 (01) :18-23
[2]   Incisor position and alveolar bone thickness: A comparative analysis of two untreated samples using lateral cephalograms [J].
Andrews, Will A. ;
Abdulrazzaq, Wakas S. ;
Hunt, Jeffrey E. ;
Mendes, Lucas M. ;
Hallman, Linda A. .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2022, 92 (01) :3-10
[3]  
Banerjee S, 2020, EUR J NUCL MED MOL I, V7, P1802
[4]  
Budiman JA, 2017, DENT HYPOTHESES, V8, P70, DOI [10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_26_17, DOI 10.4103/DENTHYP.DENTHYP_26_17]
[5]   Effect of maxillary incisor labiolingual inclination and anteroposterior position on smiling profile esthetics [J].
Cao, Li ;
Zhang, Ke ;
Bai, Ding ;
Jing, Yan ;
Tian, Ye ;
Guo, Yongwen .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (01) :121-129
[6]   Upper Incisor Position and Bony Support in Untreated Patients as Seen on CBCT [J].
Gracco, Antonio ;
Lombardo, Luca ;
Mancuso, Giulia ;
Gravina, Vincenzo ;
Siciliani, Giuseppe .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2009, 79 (04) :692-702
[7]   WITS APPRAISAL OF JAW DISHARMONY [J].
JACOBSON, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1975, 67 (02) :125-138
[8]  
Kan JYK, 2011, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V26, P873
[9]   Correlation of Three Dimensions of Palate with Maxillary Arch Form and Perimeter as Predictive Measures for Orthodontic and Orthognathic Surgery [J].
Kareem, Fadil A. ;
Rauf, Aras Maruf ;
Rasheed, Tara Ali ;
Hussain, Falah Abdullah .
CHILDREN-BASEL, 2021, 8 (06)
[10]   Lower incisor dentoalveolar compensation and symphysis dimensions among Class I and III malocclusion patients with different facial vertical skeletal patterns [J].
Molina-Berlanga, Nuria ;
Llopis-Perez, Jaume ;
Flores-Mir, Carlos ;
Puigdollers, Andreu .
ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2013, 83 (06) :948-955