Field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions

被引:5
作者
Riggs, Georgia J. [1 ]
Barton, Christine M. [2 ]
Riding, Corey S. [3 ]
O'Connell, Timothy J. [1 ]
Loss, Scott R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Ecol & Management, 008C Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Nat Resource Ecol Lab, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Salt Lake Community Coll, Dept Biol, 4600 South Redwood Rd, Salt Lake City, UT USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
BACI; Bird collisions; Bus shelters; Window collisions; Window markers; Window treatment; MORTALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s11252-022-01304-w
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Bird-window collisions are a major source of human-caused mortality for which there are multiple mitigation and prevention options available. Despite growing availability of products designed to reduce collisions (e.g., glass with etched patterns or markers and films adhered over existing glass), few replicated field tests have been conducted to assess their effectiveness after installation on glass. We conducted a field study to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially marketed product (Feather Friendly((R)) markers) in reducing bird-window collisions at glass-walled bus shelters in Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA. This study included a before-after control-impact (BACI) analysis comparing numbers of collisions at 18 bus shelters in both pre-treatment (2016) and post-treatment (2020) periods, and an analysis comparing 18 treated and 18 untreated shelters during 2020. For the BACI analysis, collisions were significantly reduced between 2016 and 2020 at shelters treated with the Feather Friendly(R) markers even though collisions increased at shelters that remained untreated. For the 2020 analysis, there were significantly fewer collisions at treated than untreated shelters. Relative to a baseline study in 2016, we estimated that treating half of Stillwater's bus shelters resulted in a 64% reduction in total annual bird collisions. Together, these analyses provide a rigorous field test of the effectiveness of this treatment option in reducing bird-window collisions. Our research provides a model for similar studies at both bus shelters and buildings to evaluate and compare products designed to reduce bird-window collisions, and therefore, contribute to reducing this major mortality source affecting bird populations.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 723
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] Year-round monitoring reveals prevalence of fatal bird-window collisions at the Virginia Tech Corporate Research Center
    Schneider, Rebecca M.
    Barton, Christine M.
    Zirkle, Keith W.
    Greene, Caitlin F.
    Newman, Kara B.
    PEERJ, 2018, 6
  • [32] Use of bird carcass removals by urban scavengers to adjust bird-window collision estimates
    Kummer, Justine A.
    Nordell, Cameron J.
    Berry, Taylor M.
    Collins, Colina V.
    Tse, Casandra R. L.
    Bayne, Erin M.
    AVIAN CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGY, 2016, 11 (02)
  • [33] Species traits and local abundance affect bird-window collision frequency
    Wittig, Thomas W.
    Cagle, Nicolette L.
    Ocampo-Penuela, Natalia
    Winton, R. Scott
    Zambello, Erika
    Lichtneger, Zane
    AVIAN CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGY, 2017, 12 (01)
  • [34] VARIATION IN BIRD-WINDOW COLLISION MORTALITY AND SCAVENGING RATES WITHIN AN URBAN LANDSCAPE
    Bracey, Annie M.
    Etterson, Matthew A.
    Niemi, Gerald J.
    Green, Richard F.
    WILSON JOURNAL OF ORNITHOLOGY, 2016, 128 (02) : 355 - 367
  • [35] Lessons learned through participatory bird-window collision research on a university campus
    Partridge, Hannah C.
    Netzley, Rebekah
    Wright, Alex
    Amodeo, Joseph
    Barnett, Sophie
    Baron, Ron
    French, Braden
    Arneson, Dakota
    Gagne, Sara A.
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2025, 28 (02)
  • [36] Window strikes: bird collisions in a Neotropical green city
    Gomez-Martinez, Miguel A.
    Klem, Daniel, Jr.
    Rojas-Soto, Octavio
    Gonzalez-Garcia, Fernando
    MacGregor-Fors, Ian
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 22 (04) : 699 - 708
  • [37] Shadow-boxing: Major gaps to knock out in bird-window interaction research
    Netzley, Rebekah
    Partridge, Hannah C.
    Gagne, Sara A.
    ORNITHOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2024,
  • [38] Window collisions by migratory bird species: urban geographical patterns and habitat associations
    Cusa, Marine
    Jackson, Donald A.
    Mesure, Michael
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2015, 18 (04) : 1427 - 1446
  • [39] Factors influencing experimental estimation of scavenger removal and observer detection in bird-window collision surveys
    Riding, Corey S.
    Loss, Scott R.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2018, 28 (08) : 2119 - 2129
  • [40] Continent-wide analysis of how urbanization affects bird-window collision mortality in North America
    Hager, Stephen B.
    Cosentino, Bradley J.
    Aguilar-Gomez, Miguel A.
    Anderson, Michelle L.
    Bakermans, Marja
    Boves, Than J.
    Brandes, David
    Butler, Michael W.
    Butler, Eric M.
    Cagle, Nicolette L.
    Calderon-Parra, Rafael
    Capparella, Angelo P.
    Chen, Anqi
    Cipollini, Kendra
    Conkey, April A. T.
    Contreras, Thomas A.
    Cooper, Rebecca I.
    Corbin, Clay E.
    Curry, Robert L.
    Dosch, Jerald J.
    Drew, Martina G.
    Dyson, Karen
    Foster, Carolyn
    Francis, Clinton D.
    Fraser, Erin
    Furbush, Ross
    Hagemeyer, Natasha D. G.
    Hopfensperger, Kristine N.
    Klem, Daniel, Jr.
    Lago, Elizabeth
    Lahey, Ally
    Lamp, Kevin
    Lewis, Greg
    Loss, Scott R.
    Machtans, Craig S.
    Madosky, Jessa
    Maness, Terri J.
    McKay, Kelly J.
    Menke, Sean B.
    Muma, Katherine E.
    Ocampo-Penuela, Natalia
    O'Connell, Timothy J.
    Ortega-Alvarezk, Ruben
    Pitt, Amber L.
    Puga-Caballero, Aura L.
    Quinn, John E.
    Varian-Ramos, Claire W.
    Riding, Corey S.
    Roth, Amber M.
    Saenger, Peter G.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2017, 212 : 209 - 215