Anything Goes? Analyzing Varied Understandings of Assent

被引:4
|
作者
Birchley, Giles [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Ctr Eth Med, Bristol Med Sch, Bristol BS8 1TH, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
assent; children; dementia; capacity; research ethics; clinical ethics; DECISION-MAKING; SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT; PARENTAL PERMISSION; INFORMED CONSENT; CHILDREN; DEMENTIA; PEOPLE; RIGHTS; CAPACITY; DISSENT;
D O I
10.1017/S0963180122000524
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Assent to medical research or treatment may be an intuitively attractive way to address the area between incapacity and capacity that might otherwise be subject to a best interests assessment. Assent has become a widely disseminated concept in law, research, and clinical ethics, but little conceptual work on assent has so far occurred. An exploration of use of assent in treatment and research in children and people with dementia suggests that at least five claims are made on behalf of assent. Since at least some of these may lead to tensions with others, assent requires firmer conceptual underpinning. Whether assent remains primarily a local approach to research in children in the United States, where it appears to fit with legal background conditions, or develops its promise to overturn the dominant, binary, approach to (in)capacity will depend on the strength of future philosophical work to improve the theoretical foundations to assent.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 89
页数:14
相关论文
共 1 条
  • [1] Anything goes for participant, patient and public involvement in youth mental health research
    Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J.
    van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.
    JCPP ADVANCES, 2024,