Mechanisms in open innovation: A review and synthesis of the literature

被引:30
作者
Ogink, Ruben H. A. J. [1 ]
Goossen, Martin C. [2 ]
Romme, A. Georges L. [3 ]
Akkermans, Henk [4 ]
机构
[1] Hello New Day & Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Old Dominion Univ, Norfolk, VA USA
[3] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
Open innovation; Literature review; Generative mechanisms; Research synthesis; Mechanisms; Research agenda; DEVELOPING DESIGN PROPOSITIONS; OPEN SEARCH STRATEGIES; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE; VALUE-CREATION; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; HIGH-TECH; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102621
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A large body of literature explores the role of context, structure, actors, and outcomes of open innovation (OI), yet pays little attention to the mechanisms underlying these relationships. In this review paper, we synthesize the OI literature using a context-mechanism-outcome approach to identify and classify the various mechanisms observed in empirical OI studies. Our findings demonstrate that the OI literature draws on a wide variety of mechanisms originating from the fields of management, sociology, economics, and psychology. The fifteen mechanisms most frequently observed in the literature fall into four categories: governance and policies; envi-ronmental dynamics and interactions; knowledge, skills, and capabilities; and learning by doing. Moreover, by examining the levels of analysis of these mechanisms, we observe substantial differences in how these mecha-nisms operate at the individual, project, firm, network, and society level. Finally, we identify various avenues for future research arising from our synthesis of the literature.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 165 条
[11]  
Audretsch B.D., 2022, TECHNOVATION
[12]   WHAT ARE MICROFOUNDATIONS? [J].
Barney, Jay ;
Felin, Teppo .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 27 (02) :138-155
[13]   Co-ownership of intellectual property: Exploring the value-appropriation and value-creation implications of co-patenting with different partners [J].
Belderbos, Rene ;
Cassiman, Bruno ;
Faems, Dries ;
Leten, Bart ;
Van Looy, Bart .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (05) :841-852
[14]   Learning at the boundaries in an "Open Regional Innovation System": A focus on firms' innovation strategies in the Emilia Romagna life science industry [J].
Belussi, Fiorenza ;
Sammarra, Alessia ;
Sedita, Silvia Rita .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (06) :710-721
[15]   Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance [J].
Berchicci, Luca .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2013, 42 (01) :117-127
[16]   An Organizational Perspective on Patenting and Open Innovation [J].
Bhaskarabhatla, Ajay ;
Hegde, Deepak .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2014, 25 (06) :1744-1763
[17]   Organizing for Inbound Open Innovation: How External Consultants and a Dedicated R&D Unit Influence Product Innovation Performance [J].
Bianchi, Mattia ;
Croce, Annalisa ;
Dell'Era, Claudio ;
Di Benedetto, C. Anthony ;
Frattini, Federico .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 33 (04) :492-510
[18]   Organizing for external technology commercialization: evidence from a multiple case study in the pharmaceutical industry [J].
Bianchi, Mattia ;
Chiaroni, Davide ;
Chiesa, Vittorio ;
Frattini, Federico .
R & D MANAGEMENT, 2011, 41 (02) :120-137
[19]  
Blind K., 2004, EC STANDARDS THEORY
[20]   ANALYSIS OF GENERATIVE MECHANISMS [J].
Blom, Bjorn ;
Moren, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REALISM, 2011, 10 (01) :60-79