Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided lumbar selective nerve root block: a retrospective comparative study (vol 14, 3235, 2024)

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Bowen [1 ,3 ]
Sun, Yang [3 ]
Zhang, Jitao [3 ]
Meng, Hailan [3 ]
Zhang, Hong [2 ]
Shan, Lequn [3 ]
机构
[1] Yanan Univ, Yanan 716000, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Honghui Hosp, Ultrasound Med Ctr, Xian 710054, Shannxi, Peoples R China
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Honghui Hosp, Spine Surg Dept, Xian 710054, Shannxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Fluoroscopy; Lumbar radiculopathy; Selective nerve root block; Ultrasound;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-59217-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided and fluoroscopy-guided lumbar selective nerve root block (SNRB), and to explore the feasibility of ultrasound-guided methods. This retrospective study included patients with lumbar radicular pain who underwent ultrasound-guided and fluoroscopy-guided selective nerve root block at Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Xi’an Jiaotong University from August 2020 to August 2022. Patients were divided into U-SNRB group and F-SNRB group according to ultrasound-guided or fluoroscopy-guided selective nerve root block. There were 43 patients in U-SNRB group and 20 patients in F-SNRB group. The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, related indexes and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups before, 30 min, 1 month and 6 months after block. To evaluate the feasibility, accuracy and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block. There were no complications in the process of selective nerve root block in both groups. The operating time and the times of closing needle angle adjustment in U-SNRB group were better than those in F-SNRB group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The VAS score and JOA score of patients in the two groups were significantly improved 30 min after block, 1 month and 6 months after block, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). The accuracy of ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block and the degree of pain relief of patients were similar to those of fluoroscopy guidance, but the operation time and needle angle adjustment times were significantly less than that of fluoroscopy, and could effectively reduce radiation exposure. Therefore, it can be used as a better way to guide for choice. © The Author(s) 2024.
引用
收藏
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided lumbar selective nerve root block: a retrospective comparative study
    Bowen Wang
    Yang Sun
    Jitao Zhang
    Hailan Meng
    Hong Zhang
    Lequn Shan
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [2] Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Block for the Treatment of Radicular Pain in the Lower Cervical Spine: A Retrospective Comparative Study
    Jang, Jin Hyuk
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Kim, Jong Woo
    Cho, Kyoung Rai
    Nam, Sang Hyun
    Park, YongBum
    PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 2020
  • [3] Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study
    Park, Ki Deok
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Nam, Sang Hyun
    Kim, Myounghwan
    Park, Yongbum
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND, 2019, 22 (02) : 167 - 177
  • [4] Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided interlaminar epidural block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: a retrospective comparative study
    Ki Deok Park
    Woo Yong Lee
    Sang Hyun Nam
    Myounghwan Kim
    Yongbum Park
    Journal of Ultrasound, 2019, 22 : 167 - 177
  • [5] Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Intercostal Nerve Block Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Epidural Nerve Block in Patients With Thoracic Herpes Zoster: A Comparative Study
    Lee, Hyo Jeong
    Park, Hong Souk
    Moon, Hyun Im
    Yoon, Seo Yeon
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (03) : 725 - 730
  • [6] Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: A randomized, blinded, controlled study
    Jee, Haemi
    Lee, Ji Hae
    Kim, Jongwoo
    Park, Ki Deok
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Park, Yongbum
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 42 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [7] Ultrasound-guided selective nerve root block versus fluoroscopy-guided transforaminal block for the treatment of radicular pain in the lower cervical spine: A randomized, blinded, controlled study
    Haemi Jee
    Ji Hae Lee
    Jongwoo Kim
    Ki Deok Park
    Woo Yong Lee
    Yongbum Park
    Skeletal Radiology, 2013, 42 : 69 - 78
  • [8] Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Injection for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study
    Kose, Halil Cihan
    Kose, Selin Guven
    Celikel, Feyza
    Tulgar, Serkan
    Akkaya, Omer Taylan
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [9] Ultrasound-Guided Hip Injections: A Comparative Study With Fluoroscopy-Guided Injections
    Byrd, J. W. Thomas
    Potts, Elizabeth A.
    Allison, Rachel K.
    Jones, Kay S.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (01): : 42 - 46
  • [10] Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block A Fluoroscopy-Controlled Feasibility Study
    Narouze, Samer N.
    Vydyanathan, Amaresh
    Kapural, Leonardo
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Mekhail, Nagy
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2009, 34 (04) : 343 - 348