Integrated Care Education for General Psychiatry Residents in the US: a Review of the Literature

被引:1
作者
Burruss, Nina Camille [1 ]
Murray, Christina [1 ]
Li, Winston [1 ,2 ]
Sowa, Nathaniel A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Hosp, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Integrated care; Collaborative care; Psychiatry; Residency; Curriculum; COLLABORATIVE CARE; HEALTH-CARE; MENTAL-HEALTH; DEPRESSION; ROTATION; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1007/s40596-023-01760-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe purpose of this review was to synthesize published literature describing integrated care education available to general psychiatry residents in the United States (US) in order to better understand curricular models and summarize curriculum barriers and facilitators.MethodsThe authors searched electronic databases for articles describing integrated care education for general psychiatry residents. Minimum inclusion criteria were focus on an ambulatory integrated care curriculum, description of the study population and training program, publication in English, and program location in the US. Data extracted included trainee, faculty, or collaborator evaluations, educational model, level of care integration, and barriers or facilitators to implementation.ResultsThe literature search identified 18 articles describing curricula at 26 residency programs for inclusion. Most programs offered clinical and didactic curricula to advanced trainees across a variety of care integration levels. Common barriers included fiscal vulnerability and difficulties identifying team members or clarifying team member roles. Common facilitators included institutional and interdepartmental support, dedicated space, and faculty supervision. No statistical analysis was able to be performed due to study heterogeneity.ConclusionsThis review found a relatively small number of articles written about integrated care education for psychiatry residents. Resident evaluation suggests this training is valuable regardless of curriculum structure, training years, or level of care integration. Dedicated funding, staff, and space were crucial for successful curricula. This review highlights a need for more rigorous research characterizing and evaluating integrated care education.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 401
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [11] Curiel H, 1982, PROBLEMS ISSUES IMPL
  • [12] A program for teaching psychiatric residents to provide integrated psychiatric and primary medical care
    Dobscha, SK
    Ganzini, L
    [J]. PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2001, 52 (12) : 1651 - 1653
  • [13] Development and Evaluation of a Novel Collaborative Care Rotation for Psychiatry Residents
    Dobscha, Steven K.
    Dandois, Matthew
    Rynerson, Annabelle
    Rabin, Sarah
    Bajrovic, Emina
    Corey, Gwyn
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 46 (04) : 491 - 494
  • [14] Moving into the neighborhood: Preparing residents to participate in a primary care environment
    Greenberg, WE
    Paulsen, RH
    [J]. HARVARD REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 1996, 4 (02) : 107 - 109
  • [15] Heath B., 2013, A standard framework for levels of integrated healthcare
  • [16] Development of an interdisciplinary women's health training model
    Henrich, JB
    Chambers, JT
    Steiner, JL
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2003, 78 (09) : 877 - 884
  • [17] Developing a Collaborative Care Training Program in a Psychiatry Residency
    Huang, Hsiang
    Forstein, Marshall
    Joseph, Robert
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2017, 58 (03) : 245 - 249
  • [18] Teaching Collaborative Care in Primary Care Settings for Psychiatry Residents
    Huang, Hsiang
    Barkil-Oteo, Andres
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2015, 56 (06) : 658 - 661
  • [19] Collaborative Depression Care Models From Development to Dissemination
    Katon, Wayne
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 42 (05) : 550 - 552
  • [20] Effects of Different Models of Integrated Collaborative Care in a Family Medicine Residency Program
    Landis, Suzanne E.
    Barrett, MaryLynn
    Galvin, Shelley L.
    [J]. FAMILIES SYSTEMS & HEALTH, 2013, 31 (03) : 264 - 273