Integrated Care Education for General Psychiatry Residents in the US: a Review of the Literature

被引:1
作者
Burruss, Nina Camille [1 ]
Murray, Christina [1 ]
Li, Winston [1 ,2 ]
Sowa, Nathaniel A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Hosp, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Integrated care; Collaborative care; Psychiatry; Residency; Curriculum; COLLABORATIVE CARE; HEALTH-CARE; MENTAL-HEALTH; DEPRESSION; ROTATION; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1007/s40596-023-01760-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThe purpose of this review was to synthesize published literature describing integrated care education available to general psychiatry residents in the United States (US) in order to better understand curricular models and summarize curriculum barriers and facilitators.MethodsThe authors searched electronic databases for articles describing integrated care education for general psychiatry residents. Minimum inclusion criteria were focus on an ambulatory integrated care curriculum, description of the study population and training program, publication in English, and program location in the US. Data extracted included trainee, faculty, or collaborator evaluations, educational model, level of care integration, and barriers or facilitators to implementation.ResultsThe literature search identified 18 articles describing curricula at 26 residency programs for inclusion. Most programs offered clinical and didactic curricula to advanced trainees across a variety of care integration levels. Common barriers included fiscal vulnerability and difficulties identifying team members or clarifying team member roles. Common facilitators included institutional and interdepartmental support, dedicated space, and faculty supervision. No statistical analysis was able to be performed due to study heterogeneity.ConclusionsThis review found a relatively small number of articles written about integrated care education for psychiatry residents. Resident evaluation suggests this training is valuable regardless of curriculum structure, training years, or level of care integration. Dedicated funding, staff, and space were crucial for successful curricula. This review highlights a need for more rigorous research characterizing and evaluating integrated care education.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 401
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] American Academy of Family Physicians, MENT HLTH CAR SERV F
  • [2] American Psychiatric Association, 2016, APAAPM REPORT DISSEM, P1
  • [3] American Psychiatric Association, 2020, LEARN COLL CAR MOD
  • [4] American Psychiatric Association, IMPL COLL CAR MOD
  • [5] Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems
    Archer, Janine
    Bower, Peter
    Gilbody, Simon
    Lovell, Karina
    Richards, David
    Gask, Linda
    Dickens, Chris
    Coventry, Peter
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (10):
  • [6] Baron D, 2019, ADV PSYCHIAT, P383
  • [7] A review of the benefits and limitations of a primary care-embedded psychiatric consultation service in a medically underserved setting
    Butler, Dennis J.
    Fons, Dominique
    Fisher, Travis
    Sanders, James
    Bodenhamer, Sara
    Owen, Julie R.
    Gunderson, Marc
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE, 2018, 53 (5-6) : 415 - 426
  • [8] A Resident Rotation in Collaborative Care: Learning to Deliver Primary Care-Based Psychiatric Services
    Cerimele, Joseph M.
    Popeo, Dennis M.
    Rieder, Ronald O.
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 37 (01) : 63 - 64
  • [9] Teaching Psychiatry Residents to Work at the Interface of Mental Health and Primary Care
    Cowley, Deborah
    Dunaway, Kristen
    Forstein, Marshall
    Frosch, Emily
    Han, Jaesu
    Joseph, Robert
    McCarron, Robert M.
    Ratzliff, Anna
    Solomon, Barry
    Unutzer, Jurgen
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 38 (04) : 398 - 404
  • [10] Training psychiatry residents as consultants in primary care settings
    Cowley, DS
    Katon, W
    Veith, RC
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 24 (03) : 124 - 132