Opposing views: associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt

被引:44
作者
Dolman, Andrew J. [1 ]
Fraser, Timothy [2 ]
Panagopoulos, Costas [2 ]
Aldrich, Daniel P. [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Daniel [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Bouve Coll Hlth Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Northeastern Univ, Coll Social Sci & Humanities, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Urban Affairs, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdab401
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Political polarization has increased in the USA within recent years. Studies have shown Republicans are less likely to accept COVID-19 vaccinations than Democrats; however, little is known regarding the association between COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and political polarization.Methods We used data from a nationally-representative survey of 1427 participants conducted between 9 February 2021 and 17 February 2021. We estimated multivariate-adjusted odds ratios for COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt according to perceived political polarization (measured as the perceived size of the ideological gap between Democrats and Republicans), political party affiliation, and social trust, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic factors.Results Among participants perceiving high levels of polarization, Republicans (versus Democrats) reported a 90% lower odds of vaccination intent (OR = 0.10 [0.05, 0.19], P < 0.001). Participants with high (versus low) social trust and low perceived polarization had a 2-folder higher vaccination intent (OR = 2.39 [1.34, 4.21], P = 0.003); this association was substantially weaker in the high perceived polarization group.Conclusions High perceived levels of political polarization appear to magnify the decrease in the odds of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and the intent to get vaccinated among Republicans versus Democrats. Political polarization may further attenuate the protective associations of high social capital with vaccination.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 39
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Bowling together by bowling alone: Social capital and COVID-19 [J].
Borgonovi, Francesca ;
Andrieu, Elodie .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2020, 265
[2]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021, COVID DAT TRACK VACC
[3]  
Jamison Amelia M, 2020, Harv Kennedy Sch Misinformation Rev, V1, DOI 10.37016/mr-2020-38
[4]   COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy in the United States: A Rapid National Assessment [J].
Khubchandani, Jagdish ;
Sharma, Sushil ;
Price, James H. ;
Wiblishauser, Michael J. ;
Sharma, Manoj ;
Webb, Fern J. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2021, 46 (02) :270-277
[5]   Factors Associated With US Adults' Likelihood of Accepting COVID-19 Vaccination [J].
Kreps, Sarah ;
Prasad, Sandip ;
Brownstein, John S. ;
Hswen, Yulin ;
Garibaldi, Brian T. ;
Zhang, Baobao ;
Kriner, Douglas L. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (10)
[6]   Mass Polarization: Manifestations and Measurements [J].
Lelkes, Yphtach .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2016, 80 :392-410
[7]   The evolution of polarization in the legislative branch of government [J].
Lu, Xiaoyan ;
Gao, Jianxi ;
Szymanski, Boleslaw K. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2019, 16 (156)
[8]   Is divisive politics making Americans sick? Associations of perceived partisan polarization with physical and mental health outcomes among adults in the United States [J].
Nayak, Sameera S. ;
Fraser, Timothy ;
Panagopoulos, Costas ;
Aldrich, Daniel P. ;
Kim, Daniel .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 284
[9]   Contextual generalized trust and immunization against the 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic in the American states: A multilevel approach [J].
Ronnerstrand, Bjorn .
SSM-POPULATION HEALTH, 2016, 2 :632-639
[10]   Predictors of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19: Results of a nationwide survey [J].
Ruiz, Jeanette B. ;
Bell, Robert A. .
VACCINE, 2021, 39 (07) :1080-1086