Using formative evaluation of a community-based opioid overdose prevention program to inform strategic communication for adoption, implementation, and sustainability

被引:2
作者
Bangham, Candice [1 ]
Cunnington, Stacey [1 ]
Fielman, Sarah [1 ]
Hurley, Meredith [2 ]
Gergerian, Sarko [2 ,3 ]
Greece, Jacey A. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Community Hlth Sci, 801 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Winthrop Dept Publ Hlth & Clin Serv, 45 Pauline St, Winthrop, MA 02152 USA
[3] Winthrop Police Dept, 3 Metcalf Sq, Winthrop, MA 02151 USA
关键词
Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Public health programs; Public safety; Opioid programs; Intervention; Diffusion of innovation; Implementation frameworks; Formative evaluation; Multi-sector partnerships; INNOVATION THEORY; RISK-FACTORS; CONSOLIDATED FRAMEWORK; DIFFUSION; INTERVENTION; DISSEMINATION; MORTALITY; COVID-19; CRISIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-023-15229-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundOpioid addiction and overdose is a public health problem in the United States and is expected to remain with substance use increasing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Communities that approach this issue through multi-sector partnerships experience more positive health outcomes. Understanding motivation for stakeholder engagement in these efforts is essential to successful adoption, implementation, and sustainability particularly in the shifting landscape of needs and resources.MethodsA formative evaluation was conducted on the C.L.E.A.R. Program in Massachusetts, a state heavily impacted by the opioid epidemic. A stakeholder power analysis identified appropriate stakeholders for the study (n = 9). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided data collection and analysis. Surveys (n = 8) examined perception and attitudes on the program; motivations and communication for engagement; and, benefits and barriers to collaboration. Stakeholder interviews (n = 6) explored the quantitative findings in more detail. Surveys were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a content analysis with deductive approach was conducted for stakeholder interviews. The Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) Theory guided recommendations for communications to engage stakeholders.ResultsAgencies represented a range of sectors and the majority (n = 5) were familiar with the C.L.E.A.R. Program. Despite the many strengths of the program and existing collaboration, based on the coding densities of each CFIR construct stakeholders identified crucial gaps in the services the program provided and noted that the overall infrastructure of the program could be enhanced. Opportunities for strategic communication to address the stages of DOI align with the gaps identified in the CFIR domains to result in increased agency collaboration and expansion of services into the surrounding communities to ensure sustainability of the C.L.E.A.R. Program.ConclusionsThis study explored factors necessary for ongoing multi-sector collaboration and sustainability of an existing community-based program especially given the changing context from COVID-19. Findings informed both program revisions and communication strategies to promote the program to new and existing collaborating agencies and the community served, and identify effective communication approaches across sectors. This is essential for successful implementation and sustainability of the program, especially as it is adapted and expanded to address post-pandemic times.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Alarcón J, 2021, J HEALTH CARE POOR U, V32, P220, DOI 10.1353/hpu.2021.0020
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010 NAT DRUG CONTR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, OFF NAT DRUG CONTR P
  • [4] [Anonymous], CFIR BOOKL
  • [5] [Anonymous], PEERS SUPP REC SUBST
  • [6] [Anonymous], PUBL POL STAT US NAL
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2020, OV DEATHS ACC COVID
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2021, Drug overdose deaths in the us top 100,000 annually
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2019, EXP ACC NAL REV DIST
  • [10] Intervention mapping: A process for developing theory- and evidence-based health education programs
    Bartholomew, LK
    Parcel, GS
    Kok, G
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR, 1998, 25 (05) : 545 - 563