Characterization of Ethos therapy systems for adaptive radiation therapy: A multi-machine comparison

被引:6
作者
van de Schoot, Agustinus J. [1 ,3 ]
Hoffmans, Daan [2 ]
van Ingen, Karel M. [1 ]
Simons, Martijn J. [2 ]
Wiersma, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, locat Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, locat Univ Amsterdam, Dept Radiat Oncol, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2023年 / 24卷 / 05期
关键词
adaptive radiotherapy; beam characterization; machine commissioning; quality assurance; PLAN SELECTION STRATEGY; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; RADIOTHERAPY; PHOTON;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13905
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeThe recently released Ethos therapy system (Varian Medical Systems) allows for online CBCT-guided adaptive radiation therapy (RT). The clinical introduction of multiple systems requires machine characterization and machine variation quantification to allow patient interchangeability between systems. Despite several clinical introductions, limited vendor-independent information on machine performance is available. Our aim was to determine the relevant dosimetric and mechanical characteristics of individual machines and to quantify machine variations. MethodsSix Ethos treatment machines, equipped with a 6-MV FFF beam including dual-layer MLC and kV-CBCT system, were recently introduced clinically after extensive machine characterization and pre-configured beam model verification. Point doses and profiles were measured and compared to vendor-provided reference data and dose calculations. Also, dose calculations were verified based on point measurements for non-standard fields and dose distributions for optimized treatment plans. Agreements between dose profiles (dose distributions) were quantified using 1D (3D) gamma-analysis. Additionally, we quantified leaf transmission, dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and couch attenuation, determined isocenter accuracy and kV-MV isocenter coincidence and verified the kV-CBCT system. Machine variations were quantified for all dosimetric and mechanical characteristics. ResultsFor all machines, distinct agreements were found between measurements and vendor-provided reference data as well as measurements and dose calculations. Mean gamma(1%/1mm) values for all profiles were below 0.30. All profiles, point measurements and dose distributions matched well among the six machines. Minimal machine variations were found in terms of DLG (0.05 mm), leaf transmission (0.001%), isocenter accuracy (0.08 mm), kV-MV isocenter coincidence (0.15 mm), couch attenuation (0.69%), and CBCT imaging dose (0.29 mGy). ConclusionsThis study demonstrates excellent agreement between individual Ethos therapy systems and vendor-provided reference data as well as a pre-configured beam model. Furthermore, our results show good consistency among all machines and provide valuable insights on relevant machine characteristics. The systematically obtained results provide benchmark data for future clinical introduction of Ethos therapy systems.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Functional information guided adaptive radiation therapy [J].
Herndon, R. Craig .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13
[22]   Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy and Opportunity Cost [J].
McComas, Kyra N. ;
Yock, Adam ;
Darrow, Kaleb ;
Shinohara, Eric T. .
ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 8 (03)
[23]   Efficient quality assurance for isocentric stability in stereotactic body radiation therapy using machine learning [J].
Salahuddin, Sana ;
Buzdar, Saeed Ahmad ;
Iqbal, Khalid ;
Azam, Muhammad Adeel ;
Strigari, Lidia .
RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 17 (01) :219-229
[24]   Adaptive and robust radiation therapy in the presence of drift [J].
Mar, Philip Allen ;
Chan, Timothy C. Y. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (09) :3599-3615
[25]   Toward robust adaptive radiation therapy strategies [J].
Bock, Michelle ;
Eriksson, Kjell ;
Forsgren, Anders ;
Hardemark, Bjorn .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) :2054-2065
[26]   MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy [J].
Benitez, Cecil M. ;
Chuong, Michael D. ;
Kuenzel, Luise A. ;
Thorwarth, Daniela .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) :84-91
[27]   Dosimetric comparison of autocontouring techniques for online adaptive proton therapy [J].
Smolders, A. ;
Choulilitsa, E. ;
Czerska, K. ;
Bizzocchi, N. ;
Krcek, R. ;
Lomax, A. ;
Weber, D. C. ;
Albertini, F. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (17)
[28]   Robust optimization strategies for contour uncertainties in online adaptive radiation therapy [J].
Smolders, A. ;
Bengtsson, I ;
Forsgren, A. ;
Lomax, A. ;
Weber, D. C. ;
Fredriksson, A. ;
Albertini, F. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (16)
[29]   Machine learning-based treatment couch parameter prediction in support of surface guided radiation therapy [J].
De Kerf, Geert ;
Claessens, Michael ;
Mollaert, Isabelle ;
Vingerhoed, Wim ;
Verellen, Dirk .
TECHNICAL INNOVATIONS & PATIENT SUPPORT IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 23 :15-20
[30]   Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors [J].
Castadot, Pierre ;
Lee, John Aldo ;
Parraga, Adriane ;
Geets, Xavier ;
Macq, Benoit ;
Gregoire, Vincent .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 89 (01) :1-12